$1:
As it turns out, much of our new government, led by Stephen Harper, hails from Alberta. And this means, according to Harper, that the West is now “in.”
$1:
1) That bogus “West wants in” garbage Okay, so let’s put a stop to this right now. It was Preston Manning who first coined the phrase, “The West wants in,” insinuating that the West had somehow been shut out of federal influence since the beginning of time. This is nonsense. The last two Liberal governments had a number of prominent cabinet members from B.C. (though only one from Alberta). And though Joe Clark didn’t last long as Prime Minister, he and a number of other MPs from the West served in Mulroney’s cabinet. What’s more, even during the Liberal reign of the past 12 years, ideas hatched by Manning were appropriated by the ruling Liberal Party as a way of undercutting growing Reform popularity. Many of the massive cuts made to government institutions were lifted directly from Reform Party policy books, for instance drastic cuts to the CBC. Alberta and other Western fiscal conservatives were already having their way, long before Jan. 23.
not true. the system that is in place is still not perfectly fair, though it is in the process of changing.
allberta's population is rising but the populaiton of the west is still smaller than the east, especially ontario and quebec. the reason that the conservatives gained a minority is because he (harper) campaigned well and long in those 2 provinces. the election(s) is/are still decided regardless of how the vote goes west of ontario. there is also the problem in the senate. the solution to this is to make the senate an elected body, to represent the intrests of the provinces, and should have limited terms like MPs.
sure, the conservative leaning parties got their way in the form of some legislation, but do you think the culture of entitlement would have happened (or the sponsorship scandal) if the electoral system didn't favour ontario and quebec?