Alright here I wade in again
$1:
Well it's already cost tax payers over 1 billion, and could cost us several more if we don't get rid of it!
money that could be better spent on community/municiple/regional police
$1:
I did hear about a good way to control guns though, make ammo cost way more! the majority of violent crimes are commited by people of low income, if they cannot afford bullets, they will have a much harder time shooting someone.
Guns cost waaaay more then ammo. These people can get guns the'll get ammo regardless of the cost. Look at the UK where you can't even buy a handgun. There homicide rate for guns /per capita is on par with ours
$1:
Maybe an out right ban of assault rifles and hand guns would be more appropriate. Limit gun ownership to single shot rifles for hunters and farmers with a special permit for classic gun collectors but they would have to be rendered inoperable.
A boulder is a stone is a rock. All guns are leathal I can only see the ban on assualt rifles making sense as a fully automatic weapon has no point in a household. An inoperable "classic gun" is nothing but a fancey paperweight.
$1:
it's also true that households with guns are more likely to shoot an intruder by accident or have a gun-related accident. We do have fewer shooting deaths in Canada with our more-stringent gun purchasing laws (at least I think they're more stringent, I have no interest in buying guns...) and I'd hate to see that reversed.
Intruder + my house = ............. thats my though on that. The stats for shooting related deaths in crime have not gone down since the registry was brought in.
$1:
well Chris Rock did a skit on this, make one bullet Cost $5000 so if someone was shot, you know he deserved it then!
Any person with a little bit of training can make their own ammo. I grew up on a farm and could load my own shot by the time I was 13 (under supervision of course)