|
Posts: 8851
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:05 pm
I'm not about to read 15 pages!
Just answer this question Kate. 'Is the objective of this group to enable all citizens to carry firearms 'ala Texas'?
|
ridenrain
CKA Uber
Posts: 22594
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:07 pm
Oh dear....
That said, I'd rather honest, moral citizens be packing heat than all the thugs who are carrying guns these days.
|
Posts: 116
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:13 pm
Yogi Yogi: I'm not about to read 15 pages!
Just answer this question Kate. 'Is the objective of this group to enable all citizens to carry firearms 'ala Texas'? You mean like this? Watch the other shoppers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul48lOxGACA
|
Posts: 8851
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:21 pm
Nuggets Nuggets: Yogi Yogi: I'm not about to read 15 pages!
Just answer this question Kate. 'Is the objective of this group to enable all citizens to carry firearms 'ala Texas'? You mean like this? Watch the other shoppers. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ul48lOxGACASorta what I had in mind! 
|
Posts: 916
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:44 pm
The majority of Canadians are responsible and follow our laws. Crime is on the increase and it's wrong that "we" don't have the freedom to buy a gun for protection.
Our government has brainwashed us.
|
Posts: 4117
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 1:59 pm
Yeah just what we need, a bunch of civies packing heat. That worked out so well for America being the murder capital of the world with the largest gun related deaths  . The sooner they realize that all criminals were once classified as citizens. Giving citizens weapons is giving criminals weapons which is fueling crime. So I will just say fuck those pro-gun idiots. If they want a gun than get a lisence.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:35 pm
meh, packing heat is stupid.
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:06 pm
Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206: Yeah just what we need, a bunch of civies packing heat. That worked out so well for America being the murder capital of the world with the largest gun related deaths  . The sooner they realize that all criminals were once classified as citizens. Giving citizens weapons is giving criminals weapons which is fueling crime. So I will just say fuck those pro-gun idiots. If they want a gun than get a lisence. The problem is that license. Cars kill much more people than guns but you only revoke a license for reckless driving/DUI/etc. But, if I DUI, I can't have a gun. That's totally stupid. The moose does not care 
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:08 pm
Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206: The sooner they realize that all criminals were once classified as citizens. Giving citizens weapons is giving criminals weapons which is fueling crime.
So I will just say fuck those pro-gun idiots. If they want a gun than get a lisence. People who are criminals are more likely to disregard the gun laws and get weapons anyways, while citizens who would liek guns don't disregard the law because they are law abiding citizens. And while at somepoint in the future these law abiding citizens break the law and commit assault, rape, or murder, the people who they are assaiulting, raping, or murdering have the option of purchasing a gun prior to the event for their own protection should the event occur. And As I said above, with gun laws, the potential assaulters, rapists, and murderers might just disregard the gun law too and aquire a gun for use anyways, leaving the law abiding, unarmed citizen helpless. Even if they only used knives, the defended is probably not as apt with a knife nor isn't allowed to carry one large enough legally to do much damage. Yet still, if someone assualts you with a pistol, a knife isn't going to do much for you unless you are a Ninja or a Jedi.
|
Posts: 11362
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:34 pm
Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind: Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206: The sooner they realize that all criminals were once classified as citizens. Giving citizens weapons is giving criminals weapons which is fueling crime.
So I will just say fuck those pro-gun idiots. If they want a gun than get a lisence. People who are criminals are more likely to disregard the gun laws and get weapons anyways, while citizens who would liek guns don't disregard the law because they are law abiding citizens. And while at somepoint in the future these law abiding citizens break the law and commit assault, rape, or murder, the people who they are assaiulting, raping, or murdering have the option of purchasing a gun prior to the event for their own protection should the event occur. And As I said above, with gun laws, the potential assaulters, rapists, and murderers might just disregard the gun law too and aquire a gun for use anyways, leaving the law abiding, unarmed citizen helpless. Even if they only used knives, the defended is probably not as apt with a knife nor isn't allowed to carry one large enough legally to do much damage. Yet still, if someone assualts you with a pistol, a knife isn't going to do much for you unless you are a Ninja or a Jedi. That's a stupid argument. We do not need a Lethaly Armed Citizenry.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:47 pm
sandorski sandorski: Canadian_Mind Canadian_Mind: Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206: The sooner they realize that all criminals were once classified as citizens. Giving citizens weapons is giving criminals weapons which is fueling crime.
So I will just say fuck those pro-gun idiots. If they want a gun than get a lisence. People who are criminals are more likely to disregard the gun laws and get weapons anyways, while citizens who would liek guns don't disregard the law because they are law abiding citizens. And while at somepoint in the future these law abiding citizens break the law and commit assault, rape, or murder, the people who they are assaiulting, raping, or murdering have the option of purchasing a gun prior to the event for their own protection should the event occur. And As I said above, with gun laws, the potential assaulters, rapists, and murderers might just disregard the gun law too and aquire a gun for use anyways, leaving the law abiding, unarmed citizen helpless. Even if they only used knives, the defended is probably not as apt with a knife nor isn't allowed to carry one large enough legally to do much damage. Yet still, if someone assualts you with a pistol, a knife isn't going to do much for you unless you are a Ninja or a Jedi. That's a stupid argument. We do not need a Lethaly Armed Citizenry. You failed to refute a single point. How is it a Stupid argument? Why do we not need Lthaly Armed Citizenry?
|
danimal
Active Member
Posts: 274
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:30 pm
Bottom line is guns kill people! 
|
poquas
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2245
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:39 pm
The ONLY people that should carry guns are law enforcement and subsistence hunters. Period! Anyone else found with a weapon gets 25 years. Farmers etc. that “require” them for pest control, have to take a course and register them.
The idea of arming civilians no matter how noble the intent is, for lack of a better term, NUTS!
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:40 pm
danimal danimal: Bottom line is guns kill people!  They do!.....so the trigger activates all on it's own?
|
|
Page 1 of 6
|
[ 80 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests |
|
|