Where do we draw line?
By JOE WARMINGTON
Who are they?
Where are they? How much will it cost to treat them?
When it comes to the dozens of refugee claimants with HIV or AIDS, these are the kind of answers Canadians are not allowed to know.
But you are allowed to pay for it. And you will.
The Canadian Taxpayers Federation said it will demand answers on the cost of housing these applicants as excited immigration lawyers trip over each other to get to the trough. It's payday -- and you know who is doing the paying.
Out there somewhere there's 150 refugee claimants, many with HIV, who skipped authorities and didn't leave after last month's AIDS conference.
It looks like an orchestrated campaign of people jumping the immigration queue. While many are in hiding, several have come forward with their sad, sympathetic stories. You have to feel for them but there are rules here. In yesterday's paper veteran Sun scribe Tom Godfrey quoted HIV-positive claimant Amanuel Tesfamichael, 32, saying, "It feels good to be free. I like Canada and the people here."
Sure he does. He will get a full immigration hearing and his HIV problem is now also ours. Sources say the cost of treating an AIDS patient can reach $1 million per year.
And there is the cost of housing these people while they wait for their hearings. Somebody has to stand up for the taxpayer, who has to foot that bill.
"That's not right," said Neil Desai, Ontario director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, adding they should "head back (to their own countries) and follow the (proper) process."
'THAT'S NOT RIGHT'
The CTF will demand an audit. "It's not fair to Canadian citizens here, paying taxes," he said.
The problem with this kind of story is it's difficult to criticize without being labelled discriminatory. "Be careful what you write!" warns a colleague.
It's an interesting irony because these "refugees" are trying to come to a country where you can have an opposing view without fear of jail time and I understand why they want to come to a place where they will be housed and cared for medically. My question is, who put them up to this?
Is there a secret, systematic plan in the AIDS world? Several of the claimants interviewed by my colleague, Alan Cairns, indicated there was a booth at the conference that referred them to lawyers on how to stay here. Is that legal? Will there be an investigation?
It's doubtful since it looks like the UN is supportive.
"Refugees and other displaced persons should not be seen as a burden to the country of asylum but rather as change agents who can help fight HIV and AIDS together," Paul Spiegel, UNHCR's senior HIV/AIDS technical officer, said recently.
Change agents? Political correctness is going to destroy us. We can't be afraid of our own shadows. We have to stand up for the integrity of our laws sometimes. If not, why even have borders or guidelines? Why not let everybody in?
LOOKS PREMEDITATED
This looks premeditated and seems to be an open road for people crashing our country while we are too gutless to protest. This has happened at other AIDS conferences and Godfrey wrote how Tesfamichael had to "sprint to a waiting car at Pearson to escape Eritrean agents."
Interesting. When was this planned? Will the accomplices face charges?
Meanwhile, thousands are trying to get in here legally -- and thousands of others are trying to bring over children or parents. It's slow and tedious but they follow the procedures, some of which discriminate against the aged and ill. They are all subjected to AIDS tests and if they fail, they are not accepted. It's too bad but that's the way it is. There are standards that must be met. But here you have a bunch of people who would not pass that test, already here and burdening our already overworked medical system.
Here's a question: Where do we draw the line?
source