PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
No but it has ocurred to me that every year the flu shot comes out it's a crap shoot. With all the strains of flu virus out there nobody can be sure which flu vaccine to work on from year to year.
Ok, here are all the reasons why you're wrong....
First of all, you are right, they do have to 'guess' what strains to include in the vaccines (at least for the seasonal flu vaccines). But this is not an issue here... we know (from seeing infection patterns in Australia, where they have their flu season earlier) that H1N1 will be the dominate circulating strain. So, you can be almost guaranteed that the H1N1 vaccine will be effective against the main circulating strain.
Secondly, even if the scientists developing the vaccine 'guess wrong' and pick a strain that isn't the biggest risk, that does not mean that the vaccine is 'worthless'...
- Even if it doesn't contain the "main" circulating strain, more than 1 strain always circulates every year. So you would still have less chance of catching the flu overall.
- In some cases, a vaccination against one 'strain' of the flu may provide at least partial protection against similar strains.
By the way, you made it sound like the people developing the vaccine are guessing almost at "random" which strains to include. Fact is, before they decide, they examine transmission patterns in other countries where influenza is currently circulating, and quote often they do pick the "correct strains".
So, avoiding the flu shot just because they
might not have picked the correct strain is foolish.
$1:
And since there appears to be more than one strain of H1N1, the crap shoot continues.
Yes, there are more than 1 strains of H1N1, but we know exactly which one is actually circulating.
$1:
No thanks, I'll pass on the toxic injection and takes me chances.
Please provide proof that the flu shot is, in any way, a 'toxic injection'. We've been innoculating people for influenza as well as other diseases for decades. If there was anything 'toxic' about it, then how come we haven't seen any sort of evidence about it? (And I'm talking about
real evidence, based on studies involving things like control groups, not just meaningless anecdodes.)
$1:
If I die, then I was meant to die.
What a really stupid attitude.
Does that mean you regularly walk out in the middle of traffic? After all, not all cars will hit you, but if one does, you were "meant to die"?
Do you also forsake all other medical care? After all, any visit to the doctor's office or hospital in order to "save your life" might interfere with your "expectation to die".
The saddist part is, even if you were "meant to die", your foolish attitude could end up resulting in the deaths of people around you.