|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Posts: 4805
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:26 am
Yeah Harper has damaged democracy so bad, I mean any day now we're going to turn into Lybia, Egypt or Bahrain. My god someoone stop this man. 
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:30 am
nova72 nova72: The last three elections was Harper wanting one and now the opposition parties had to bring the Tory govt down because they wouldn't obey Parliament. Even Mulroney, wasn't that stupid or arrogantto go against Parliament. So now we have another election and its all about contempt of Parliament even though Harper says Canadians don't care about how the Tories act or don't act. I say, a majority of Canadians do care about scams, schemes and corruption within the government. Harper should have resigned his seat as PM because he refused to follow Parliament's requested for information Parliament needed. So if you care about a true and honest government and democracy, then you can not vote for the Tories, but if you only care about party lines, than you will throw out democracy and vote a dishonest and dictatorial party back in.  I see what you did there. So when I vote Conservative again I'm really voting against democracy. Hmmm voting against democracy. Is that an oxymoron?
|
FieryVulpine 
Forum Elite
Posts: 1348
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:34 am
That's what I say when someone accuses Harper of being a fascist: then why are we having an election?
|
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:36 am
dino_bobba_renno dino_bobba_renno: One reasons to oppose the Ignatieff candidate in your riding = They're a member of the Liberal Party  In the end that's the only reason I'll ever need to forever oppose the Liberals. The only thing I need to know from Liberal history is that this self-aggrandizing group of Trudeauite clones remains the biggest self-serving criminal organization in the entire existence of Canada, and that the bastards will always be that way.
|
Posts: 11809
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:15 am
11) Because right here in the riding we live in there's a huge port expansion in Prince Rupert serviced by a crumbling two-lane road often closed for days at a time, a single rail track and a piss poor communication link. There is a huge mining and exploration boom in areas with no Hydro line, rail line or paved roads. And your Tory candidate wants to spend billions building prisons.
|
Posts: 14139
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:22 am
$1: So if you care about a true and honest government and democracy, then you can not vote for the Tories, Newsflash!! Based on your criteria, I can't vote for ANY party!!
Last edited by PublicAnimalNo9 on Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 4247
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:22 am
herbie herbie: 11) Because right here in the riding we live in there's a huge port expansion in Prince Rupert serviced by a crumbling two-lane road often closed for days at a time, a single rail track and a piss poor communication link. There is a huge mining and exploration boom in areas with no Hydro line, rail line or paved roads. And your Tory candidate wants to spend billions building prisons. In Alberta the very companies that needed improvement and expansion on infrastructure to support their operations had to chip in on those improvements. Why can't BC look at a similar arrangement? Besides, most of that has an equal or greater amount to do with the Provincial government not the Feds. Maybe you guys should have prioritized before spending buckets of money on road improvements to ski hills for the games.
|
Posts: 11809
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:39 am
dino_bobba_renno dino_bobba_renno: herbie herbie: 11) Because right here in the riding we live in there's a huge port expansion in Prince Rupert serviced by a crumbling two-lane road often closed for days at a time, a single rail track and a piss poor communication link. There is a huge mining and exploration boom in areas with no Hydro line, rail line or paved roads. And your Tory candidate wants to spend billions building prisons. In Alberta the very companies that needed improvement and expansion on infrastructure to support their operations had to chip in on those improvements. Why can't BC look at a similar arrangement? Besides, most of that has an equal or greater amount to do with the Provincial government not the Feds. Maybe you guys should have prioritized before spending buckets of money on road improvements to ski hills for the games. 12) Because most of the BC gov't votes Conservative.
|
Posts: 4247
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:15 am
herbie herbie: 12) Because most of the BC gov't votes Conservative. I'm sorry, you kind of lost me there. I'm not sure what your getting at.
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:21 am
The only reason I would not vote for the Conservative candidate is because he has no chance to win at all and my riding in Montreal is one of the only swing riding on Montreal and I don't want the Bloc candidate to be re-elected.
|
Posts: 35270
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:31 am
I had no idea since I just moved here but my MP is Conservative Sylvie Boucher. 
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:05 pm
herbie herbie: 11) Because right here in the riding we live in there's a huge port expansion in Prince Rupert serviced by a crumbling two-lane road often closed for days at a time, a single rail track and a piss poor communication link. There is a huge mining and exploration boom in areas with no Hydro line, rail line or paved roads. And your Tory candidate wants to spend billions building prisons. Well let's see. Highways are a provincial matter, as are Hydro lines. Which by the way the provincial government is in the process of installing new lines just so mining can expand. The rail lines and their quality are the responsibility of the railway that operates over them, and the communication infrastucture is the responsibility of private companies. The only thing you've mentioned in this post, prisons, are actually a responsibility of the federal government.
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:20 pm
raydan raydan: I had no idea since I just moved here but my MP is Conservative Sylvie Boucher.  Oh, the one we NEVER heard about ? 
|
Posts: 6584
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:22 pm
RUEZ RUEZ: herbie herbie: 11) Because right here in the riding we live in there's a huge port expansion in Prince Rupert serviced by a crumbling two-lane road often closed for days at a time, a single rail track and a piss poor communication link. There is a huge mining and exploration boom in areas with no Hydro line, rail line or paved roads. And your Tory candidate wants to spend billions building prisons. Well let's see. Highways are a provincial matter, as are Hydro lines. Which by the way the provincial government is in the process of installing new lines just so mining can expand. The rail lines and their quality are the responsibility of the railway that operates over them, and the communication infrastucture is the responsibility of private companies. The only thing you've mentioned in this post, prisons, are actually a responsibility of the federal government.Actually, no. Prisons are provincials (less than 2 years). Penitentiaries (2 years and more) are federal.
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:25 pm
Proculation Proculation: RUEZ RUEZ: herbie herbie: 11) Because right here in the riding we live in there's a huge port expansion in Prince Rupert serviced by a crumbling two-lane road often closed for days at a time, a single rail track and a piss poor communication link. There is a huge mining and exploration boom in areas with no Hydro line, rail line or paved roads. And your Tory candidate wants to spend billions building prisons. Well let's see. Highways are a provincial matter, as are Hydro lines. Which by the way the provincial government is in the process of installing new lines just so mining can expand. The rail lines and their quality are the responsibility of the railway that operates over them, and the communication infrastucture is the responsibility of private companies. The only thing you've mentioned in this post, prisons, are actually a responsibility of the federal government.Actually, no. Prisons are provincials (less than 2 years). Penitentiaries (2 years and more) are federal. I realize that, but of all the things he's listed only prisons would even be on the Federal government radar.
|
|
Page 2 of 6
|
[ 90 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
|