[Tricks]

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

Tricks Tricks:

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

$1:

"There are no provisions in [elections law] for [this special voting] to take place," he insisted.
"We only asked the question, ‘Is this legal?' And Elections Canada said, ‘No.'"

So what happened to the rule of law?

I could ask the same thing to the liberal party, but they don't seem to care either. Funny how they care now though

Funny how you don't.

Such a witty comeback. So if they are not legal, why arent they? What about them isn't? Why did they conveniently leave that part out? Or is it just more liberal bribing.

[Donny_Brasco]

Tricks Tricks:

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

Tricks Tricks:

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

$1:

"There are no provisions in [elections law] for [this special voting] to take place," he insisted.
"We only asked the question, ‘Is this legal?' And Elections Canada said, ‘No.'"

So what happened to the rule of law?

I could ask the same thing to the liberal party, but they don't seem to care either. Funny how they care now though

Funny how you don't.

Such a witty comeback. So if they are not legal, why arent they? What about them isn't? Why did they conveniently leave that part out? Or is it just more liberal bribing.

Where would a bribe come in? They asked if they were legal and they said "NO". Who needs to be bribed? Are you like Stephen Harper, questioning the loyalty of all of our hard working public servants?

[Tricks]

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

Tricks Tricks:

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

Tricks Tricks:

Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:

$1:

"There are no provisions in [elections law] for [this special voting] to take place," he insisted.
"We only asked the question, ‘Is this legal?' And Elections Canada said, ‘No.'"

So what happened to the rule of law?

I could ask the same thing to the liberal party, but they don't seem to care either. Funny how they care now though

Funny how you don't.

Such a witty comeback. So if they are not legal, why arent they? What about them isn't? Why did they conveniently leave that part out? Or is it just more liberal bribing.

Where would a bribe come in? They asked if they were legal and they said "NO". Who needs to be bribed? Are you like Stephen Harper, questioning the loyalty of all of our hard working public servants?

Like the military?

How do you know the Libs did not bribe them into saying that, and why is it illegal? Why not tell them, I think they have a right to know

[Tricks]

lily lily:

$1:

How do you know the Libs did not bribe them into saying that, and why is it illegal? Why not tell them, I think they have a right to know

Do you have any reason, other than blind partisanship. to suspect bribery took place? That's a serious charge, and shouldn't be spouted off on a whim.

No I don't but after adscam, I would not put it past them




















You know I am doing this just to see how pissed of I can get you guys

[OnTheIce]

lily lily:

Isn't this fun? The Cons put up a post about Edmonton voting irregularities, but when one gets put up showing possible CPC misdeeds what do they do? Comment on the issue itself? No, of course not. It's apparently much more interesting to point out the font chosen for the topic header, and go off on some tangent about another issue that could have a thread of its own.

Typical.

Just like you Liberals do. Take a look at my Wappell post for a very recent example.

Doesn't it suck when it gets turned back in your face?

Suck it up. It's over folks.

[Tricks]

lily lily:

I don't think you want to know what I'm really thinking.


And no... it's nothing close to my being pissed off.

Damn, I tried didn't I? I still would like to know why they ocnsider it illegal.

[OnTheIce]

lily lily:

I don't think you want to know what I'm really thinking.


And no... it's nothing close to my being pissed off.

Nor do I care

[OnTheIce]

lily lily:

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

lily lily:

Isn't this fun? The Cons put up a post about Edmonton voting irregularities, but when one gets put up showing possible CPC misdeeds what do they do? Comment on the issue itself? No, of course not. It's apparently much more interesting to point out the font chosen for the topic header, and go off on some tangent about another issue that could have a thread of its own.

Typical.

Just like you Liberals do. Take a look at my Wappell post for a very recent example.

Doesn't it suck when it gets turned back in your face?

Suck it up. It's over folks.

The really funny thing?

It should have been over before it even started.


So... once again you fall back on the child's argument... "he started it"... "oh yeah? Well, she was way worse than me!"

You guys should take your act on the road.

Your opinion matters. It really does.

[SireJoe]

Wow Great thread.

[OnTheIce]

No sources?

[Tory_canuck]

Maybe someone handling the whole thing with the addresses and polling stations just got mixed up.Me and the other cashiers at work sometimes get mixed up with the orders at work when the packers just stick all of the food on the counter and there is 10 orders all at once only one cashier.The whole mix up is most likely an inadvertiant unintended mistake.

[Donny_Brasco]

Tory_canuck Tory_canuck:

Maybe someone handling the whole thing with the addresses and polling stations just got mixed up.Me and the other cashiers at work sometimes get mixed up with the orders at work when the packers just stick all of the food on the counter and there is 10 orders all at once only one cashier.The whole mix up is most likely an inadvertiant unintended mistake.

REMINDER: DON'T TRUST THE CONSERVATIVES TO GET THINGS RIGHT.

[dgthe3]

Mistakes often happen. Convienient mistakes are scrutinized.

[maple_leaf1]

This is bullshit. One way or another, even if people went to the wrong station, they would be re-directed to the right one....So, it doesn't do anything more than lose people's time. Yes, I believe it's nothing more than a mistake. And I would've said the same thing had it been mistakenly done by any other party.

[maple_leaf1]

lily lily:

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

lily lily:

I don't think you want to know what I'm really thinking.


And no... it's nothing close to my being pissed off.

Nor do I care

That's good, actually... since I was talking to tricks, not you.

You're 41 years old, yet, you love to argue until you get the last word....over a 16 year old (no offence Tricks). You think you're more mature than others? Not me.

You're more childish than alot of people on this site lady.