Motorcycleboy Motorcycleboy:
Maybe they didn't care a year ago. They didn't run on an environmental platform. They told Canadians very clearly what their priorities were. Nobody can say they didn't know what they were voting for.
Now the public has grown increasingly concerned about the subject, so they've made considerable efforts to make it a priority.
Isn't that what governments are supposed to do in a democracy? Isn't that the essence of "responsive" government? You're NDP. You guys have been screaming about the environment for years. Now you've got a government that's willing to work with you. So what's the problem?
The problem is we've got a government whose first thought when it comes to target setting is to consult the very industry creating the problem! That's a clear conflict of interest. By all means consult with industry to develop strategies to achieve targets, but they're in no position to help set the targets. I reserve my judgement of the next incarnation of the dirty air act until after it's released.
$1:
There's tons of precedent for declaring contentious issues "confidence" motions. Particularly in a minority situation.
And what could be more contentious than an issue that has Canadian soldiers fighting and dying?
If memory serves, almost all past minorities fell on bugets.
$1:
For sure. All bets are off once the writ's dropped. That's why I think the Tories are still seriously contemplating an election. The Libs are weak and unfocused at the moment. They're not ready to fight an election campaign.
Could be dangerous, though, to force the Liberals to rally around Dion. Just cause you guys couldn't in 2000 doesn't mean they can't in 2007.
