CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options



PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:58 pm
 


grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
5. Canada shall be divided into Four Provinces, named Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick.(6)


$1:
Note #6. (6) Canada now consists of ten provinces (Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba, British Columbia Prince Edward Island, Alberta Saskatchewan and Newfoundland) and three territories (the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut).
The first territories added to the Union were Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory, (subsequently designated the Northwest Territories), which were admitted pursuant to section 146 of the Constitution Act, 1867 and the Rupert's Land Act, 1868, 31-32 Vict., c. 105 (U.K.), by the Rupert's Land and North-Western Territory Order of June 23, 1870, effective July 15, 1870. Prior to the admission of those territories the Parliament of Canada enacted An Act for the temporary Government of Rupert's Land and the North-Western Territory when united with Canada (32-33 Vict., c. 3), and the Manitoba Act, 1870, (33 Vict., c. 3), which provided for the formation of the Province of Manitoba.

British Columbia was admitted into the Union pursuant to section 146 of the Constitution Act, 1867, by the British Columbia Terms of Union, being Order in Council of May 16, 1871, effective July 20, 1871.

Prince Edward Island was admitted pursuant to section 146 of the Constitution Act, 1867, by the Prince Edward Island Terms of Union, being Order in Council of June 26, 1873, effective July 1, 1873.

On June 29, 1871, the United Kingdom Parliament enacted the Constitution Act, 1871 (34- 35 Vict., c. 28) authorizing the creation of additional provinces out of territories not included in any province. Pursuant to this statute, the Parliament of Canada enacted the Alberta Act, (July 20, 1905, 4-5 Edw. VII, c. 3) and the Saskatchewan Act (July 20, 1905, 4-5 Edw. VII, c. 42), providing for the creation of the provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan, respectively. Both these Acts came into force on Sept. 1, 1905.

Meanwhile, all remaining British possessions and territories in North America and the islands adjacent thereto, except the colony of Newfoundland and its dependencies, were admitted into the Canadian Confederation by the Adjacent Territories Order, dated July 31, 1880.

The Parliament of Canada added portions of the Northwest Territories to the adjoining provinces in 1912 by The Ontario Boundaries Extension Act, 1912, 2 Geo. V, c. 40, The Quebec Boundaries Extension Act, 1912, 2 Geo. V, c. 45 and The Manitoba Boundaries Extension Act, 1912, 2 Geo. V, c. 32, and further additions were made to Manitoba by The Manitoba Boundaries Extension Act, 1930, 20-21 Geo. V c. 28.

The Yukon Territory was created out of the Northwest Territories in 1898 by The Yukon Territory Act, 61 Vict., c. 6, (Canada).

Newfoundland was added on March 31, 1949, by the Newfoundland Act, (U.K.), 12-13 Geo. VI, c. 22, which ratified the Terms of Union between Canada and Newfoundland.

Nunavut was created by partitioning the Northwest Territories into two on June 13, 1998, by the Constitution Act, 1999 (Nunavut) , 46-47 Eliz. II, 1997-98, c. 15 (Canada).





PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:59 pm
 


See, I can cut and paste too....


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 11051
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:01 pm
 


Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:
Tricks Tricks:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
With the exception of Robair , Wulla and Lilly...I think the rest of you who have posted in this thread , should be fucking ashamed of what you have said to each other .
You are far to intelligent as individuals and as a group , to be throwing such miserable words of hate at each other.
There is not one among you..... fit or qualified to judge another human being. The world is a hard enough place to live in , with out someone picking on you because of your race or religion.
Assholes come in every size shape and color...and man have I ever read a lot about them tonight.

Thank you for your time Fat
even me? :( PDT_Armataz_01_09


I'm impressed that you actually agreed with Lily. PDT_Armataz_01_34

Maybe I've misjudged you.
Without sounding rude...the only judgement I need.... will not come from anyone one on this board.





PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:06 pm
 


fatbasturd fatbasturd:
Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:
Tricks Tricks:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
With the exception of Robair , Wulla and Lilly...I think the rest of you who have posted in this thread , should be fucking ashamed of what you have said to each other .
You are far to intelligent as individuals and as a group , to be throwing such miserable words of hate at each other.
There is not one among you..... fit or qualified to judge another human being. The world is a hard enough place to live in , with out someone picking on you because of your race or religion.
Assholes come in every size shape and color...and man have I ever read a lot about them tonight.

Thank you for your time Fat
even me? :( PDT_Armataz_01_09


I'm impressed that you actually agreed with Lily. PDT_Armataz_01_34

Maybe I've misjudged you.
Without sounding rude...the only judgement I need.... will not come from anyone one on this board.


OK, without sounding rude, I wasn't talking to you.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 11051
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:16 pm
 


Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:
Tricks Tricks:
fatbasturd fatbasturd:
With the exception of Robair , Wulla and Lilly...I think the rest of you who have posted in this thread , should be fucking ashamed of what you have said to each other .
You are far to intelligent as individuals and as a group , to be throwing such miserable words of hate at each other.
There is not one among you..... fit or qualified to judge another human being. The world is a hard enough place to live in , with out someone picking on you because of your race or religion.
Assholes come in every size shape and color...and man have I ever read a lot about them tonight.

Thank you for your time Fat
even me? :( PDT_Armataz_01_09


I'm impressed that you actually agreed with Lily. PDT_Armataz_01_34

Maybe I've misjudged you.
Without sounding rude...the only judgement I need.... will not come from anyone one on this board.


OK, without sounding rude, I wasn't talking to you.
my bad :oops:


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4229
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:32 pm
 


fatbasturd fatbasturd:
should be fucking ashamed of what you have said to each other .

There is not one among you..... fit or qualified to judge another human being. The world is a hard enough place to live in , with out someone picking on you because of your race or religion.

Assholes come in every size shape and color...and man have I ever read a lot about them tonight.


Spare me your self righteous indignation. This is not some far away issue for armchair pontificators but rather an issue for some of us here that directly affects family, friends and us personally. I may not agree with Donny or others sentiment nor the manner in which they present themselves but I’ll defend everyone’s right to broach this subject regardless of the sensibilities they may offend.

Further, the only failure here, according to CKA rules, is in your approach to your duties as a Moderator.

CKA: Moderators are individuals (or groups of individuals) whose job it is to look after the running of the forums from day to day. They have the power to edit or delete posts and lock, unlock, move, delete and split topics in the forum they moderate. Generally moderators are there to prevent people going off-topic or posting abusive or offensive material.

Ban me if you must. Stifling both conservative and independent thought is a time honoured lieberal Canadian tradition and would certainly make this site more enjoyable for those who feel uncomfortable in an environment which brings their perspective into conflict with opposing viewpoints. I for one welcome this sort of forum as only reaffirming ones beliefs stagnates them to growth. I’ll take my evolving English to your legislated French any day!





PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:38 pm
 


grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Ban me if you must. Stifling both conservative and independent thought is a time honoured lieberal Canadian tradition and would certainly make this site more enjoyable for those who feel uncomfortable in an environment which brings their perspective into conflict with opposing viewpoints. I for one welcome this sort of forum as only reaffirming ones beliefs stagnates them to growth. I’ll take my evolving English to your legislated French any day!


Like you ever said anything worth banning. You must be a hero in your own mind. LMFAO!!!


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4229
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 6:43 pm
 


Lily & Donny.

I posted the rules of the moderator in their entirety.

The only connection between the Squamish and the Chinese is that the new immigrant can live right next door to the recipient of his labour and I was using this an argument against racial profiling in taxation and wealth distribution.

I do not know the power of the moderator but I am sure he has the power to ban. Since he conducts himself in such an unprofessional manner why wouldn’t he ban me for challenging him?

Good news for you eh Donny?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4229
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:05 pm
 


lily lily:
Moderators can't ban...


Thanks. You also taught me to post pictures.

lily lily:
But again... what do the Squamish (and now the Chinese) have to do with voting irregularities in Saskatchewan?


Please read from the start and if you still don't get it I promise to explain in depth.

lily lily:
Unless you have no idea where Squamish is?


I know exactly where Squamish is, its proximity to the Squamish Nation I am a little unclear on. Regardless, it was the first community in BC with a large Asian immigrant workforce that was astride a reservation that came to mind. Lets not make that a bigger deal.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4229
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:14 pm
 


Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:
You must be a hero in your own mind. LMFAO!!!


Better to be that than a hero for the lieberals and their sickening apartheid. Some time this week when another native women goes missing and all the elders, police, chiefs and even members of her own family ignore it you can smugly trot out Stonechild and attack whitey to assuage your lack of conscious.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4229
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:19 pm
 


lily lily:
But really... it has little to do with the topic.... which is possible voting irregularities in Saskatchewan.


The question of voting irregularities was steeped in implications of racism. As the debate flowed it changed and evolved and I just picked Squamish completely at random (should have said East Indian and Sarcee on the outskirts of Calgary).


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4229
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:29 pm
 


lily lily:
You're right about the racism implications... that was apparent from Donny's initial post. However... what are your thoughts about it minus the race factor? Does the guy have a right to complain? If there were indeed pamphlets left in the voting booths, that's wrong. But were there? And about the lack of scrutineers... that's not grounds to order a recount. Scrutineers are the candidate's choice and responsibility... Elections Canada doesn't provide them... or deny them access unless they have grounds.


The guy only has a right to complain if there is evidence to suggest that irregularities occurred. Then it is up to Elections Canada to investigate. I don't care whom or what your affiliations are, voting is serious and integrity in voting is paramount. There will be 20 odd accusations made this election from all parties against all parties and that is an important part of democracy. If it occurs on a reserve it should not be glossed over out of fears of charges of racism. Also, lack of scrutineers does not justify fraud.





PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:36 pm
 


grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
Donny_Brasco Donny_Brasco:
You must be a hero in your own mind. LMFAO!!!


Better to be that than a hero for the lieberals and their sickening apartheid. Some time this week when another native women goes missing and all the elders, police, chiefs and even members of her own family ignore it you can smugly trot out Stonechild and attack whitey to assuage your lack of conscious.


Just because your not briefed in the morning about where every phone call, email, search party or press confrence is being held doesn't mean its not happening.

You're a sick man.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:22 pm
 


Yeah,

And your 'I hate whitey' attitude is so healthy :roll:


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
Profile
Posts: 274
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:36 pm
 


grainfedprairieboy grainfedprairieboy:
If you find the truth offensive then you have much deeper problems. My comment is a reaction to the whitewash implication that accusations of corruption on a reserve are steeped in racism rather than reality.


I do not find the truth offensive. I find your choice of words offensive.

If your intent was, as you claim, to further debate, you could have worded that as "there is no guarantee of [whoever in particular, the reserve in general] being above cheating, and here are my reasons for stating such..."

Instead you chose ridicule and derision to shut down the argument.

THAT is what offended me.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 99 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.