andyt andyt:
Govts can't do much about job creation unless it's in the public sector.
Don't tell anyone that they will think you are a commie or something.
$1:
Or they spend money on infrastructure and such
Which is what they are mandated to do, and Saint Fartybags of Ireland did just that and called it part of the deficit spending, which it was not.
$1:
. That leads to rising debt, because despite everybody being convinced that there's all sorts of waste to be cut in govt, when the govt tries to cut a program that the complainer cares about, all of a sudden govt pork isn't so bad.
government pork is what Harper has done since the campaign has started. The taxable con handout family benefit's cheque is the worse case scenario and no one ever had the gumption to do anything of this sort ever, well maybe Duplessis in quebec . He used to arrive in small towns buy kids shoes and send them home telling them to tell their parents who bought them..Same diff. very Canadianesque of Harper.
$1:
Of course the govt could always raise taxes, and cut out some of the giveaways Harper has put into place. Watch the screaming if a govt tries to do that.
you should have added "again" for he has given hidden tax hikes , such as the handout to families they have to pay back.
$1:
Health care, how do you fix it? It's just going to cost more and more with an aging population. I doubt we could successfully adopt a European system of private and public mix, because he US insurers would be in like a dirty shirt under NAFTA, instead of the non-profit insurers they have in Europe.
can't add to that piece of lucid and historic piece of truth.
$1:
So the pols don't talk about it because there isn't a clear direction that most Canadians agree with on these issues. We've been lied to so long, we can't handle the truth.
When I came here I got a lot of"Well thats just politics and politicians "
$1:
I don't like Harper's buying off the upper middle class, I think govt money spent on lowest income earners gives much better returns for the country, saves money in the end.
It in fact does help when given to the poor .They blow it on the economy really fast. The upper classes are who pay Harper's "C" logo bills . He panders to them and the real wierd thing and I mean really wierd thing is this.
Most of my friends are Harperites in off line life...i don't have online friends i think it is bullocks and not real... take ...how people act here...you don't get that in real life or you would have zero friends and family around or be locked up.
So these friends of mine vote for Harper because it somehow makes them feel superior and upper class.
It gives them a false sense of being better than everyone else. Conservatives are mostly like that, but in reality a lot of them are just wannabe's.
They lie to themselves and hide in a vote. It's all abpout a feeling of belonging to something better.
Oh a long time ago this wasn't the case in Canada, all parties have changed,
the Most Canadian are NDP and Liberal now . they hold the only
semblance of true Canadian values and carry the age old theme that people abroad thought of us before Harper gave them the chance to
point and say "See Canada is not special , they are just the same as america"
$1:
But C51, hobbling of Elections Canada, Robocalls, muzzling of
scientists, and so on are the reason to dump Harper, period.
Well you could add his non handling of the economy and like some religious freak who still does not believe in his fairy tale
Shouts about how good it is$1:
And the Duffy saga just fits right in there with the machinations, and it's the only one where there may be some clarity coming out of it.
The duffy saga is not a saga but real life . It screams about the culture that Harper turned his PMO into.
Thats what it really does and that guy screaming at the media person, is typical of a hanger oner who knows deep down he has been shown for what he gave his money to . That guy is on the "C" logo fund raising circus for sure and it hurts..it really hurts as his melt down shows.
what? too long?