[BartSimpson]

xerxes xerxes:

It doesn't matter. All Muslims are guilty because of the 0.0001% that commit acts of terrorism. Just like the Jews are still guilty of killing Christ.

And all gun owners are guilty of all gun crimes and all Christians are guilty of violently oppressing Canadian atheists and abortion hobbyists, and all white people are guilty of damned near everything.

[andyt]

I think you just made Xerxes point. Good job, nice sarcasm.

Even if the point was supposed to be serious, you do realize you've just aligned yourself with the left wing crazies, right. No diff between their thinking and yours. Although, I have to admit, I'm only supposing those are left wing crazy memes, since I've never actually heard them espoused anywhere. Except in your head. Oh, and by that scarecrow.

[BartSimpson]

$1:

Muslims account for only about 1 percent of the U.S. population but account for about half of terrorist attacks since 9/11. That means Muslims in the United States are about 5,000 percent more likely to commit terrorist attacks than non-Muslims.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/donald-tr ... mmigration

[sandorski]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

$1:

Muslims account for only about 1 percent of the U.S. population but account for about half of terrorist attacks since 9/11. That means Muslims in the United States are about 5,000 percent more likely to commit terrorist attacks than non-Muslims.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/donald-tr ... mmigration

Still moot. What compels you and others to keep bringing these unrelated points up? Is it now Open Season on all Muslims?

[BartSimpson]

sandorski sandorski:

Is it now Open Season on all Muslims?

No, it isn't.

[sandorski]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

sandorski sandorski:

Is it now Open Season on all Muslims?

No, it isn't.

Then why keep posting unrelated actions to the incident being discussed in this thread?

[PluggyRug]

sandorski sandorski:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

sandorski sandorski:

Is it now Open Season on all Muslims?

No, it isn't.

Then why keep posting unrelated actions to the incident being discussed in this thread?

They are not unrelated.

[Delwin]

True, both events happened on earth, so there's that...

[Public_Domain]

[Delwin]

Ahh, so another case of throwing a pic up without any context and pretending it is supposed to illustrate evidence of something that doesn't exist. That old chestnut...

[Public_Domain]

[Jin-Gitaxias]

desertdude desertdude:

$1:

The people you tortured, they're going to spend eternity in Heaven," the woman said in the video. "You are very deceived by Satan. Your mind has been taken over -- brainwashed -- and you have nothing but hate. Nothing but hate.

And she has nothing but love in her heart, right ?

http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_2922 ... nfinite-up

She was fighting one type of religious extremism with another ... which is pointless.

Islamic extremism must be replaced with liberal democracy. If it is replaced with Christian extremism then nothing good will happen.

[rickc]

I have several thoughts on this story that I would like to address in my typical rambling style. In the video we see a female park ranger try to defuse the situation. Because she is a regional park ranger and not a state park ranger, she has no police powers. She is not a peace officer. Thats messed up. I know that the job of a park ranger is different from a regular police officer, I get it. I also know that you are going to come across many unsavory characters as a park ranger. People who do not wish to lose their boat and the truck that towed it because they are fishing without a license, disobeying catch or bag limits, etc. Many are not going to go quietly. They are drinking, they are in groups, they are away from large urban crowds with many witnesses. It is totally ridiculous to ask a ranger to enforce laws without police powers. If this park ranger had police powers, she could have made an arrest on the spot. An assault and battery was commited in her presence. She witnessed it. Thats all that is requred to make a misdomeaner arrest without a warrant. Don't ask someone to do a job and not give them the tools, or authority to do the job. Are the rangers suppossed to say "stop what you are doing and wait right here for the next hour for the police to arrive" ? Give all park rangers police powers. This would have nipped this in the bud. The loudmouth bitch would be arrested on the spot. She would have to post bail. She would be facing assault and battery charges, and possible hate crime charges. She might very well still be facing these charges.

Whats up with all these women acting like loudmouth assholes on the web lately? This crazy bitch. That kid screaming at the professor at Yale, That crazy professor assaulting the photographer and asking for more "muscle" to help violate the kids civil rights. Feminists destroying other peoples personal property (signs that they disagree with), interupting meetings and shouting down speakers, assaulting people they disagree with. They seem to think that they can go around assaulting people, and if the victim retaliates, they start screaming for the police to arrest the victim. I recently seen a video where two women were assaulting a male employee at a McDonalds. One slapped the employee and jumped over the counter to batter the employee. The employee grabbed some sort of pipe and started beating the shit out of the two women. Some lady in the restaurant was screaming at the employee to STOP!!!! She did not have shit to say when the two women were assaulting the man. It was only when the tide turned against the attackers, that she wanted the violence to STOP!!! The male employee actually got arrested, and spent much time in jail (due to not being able to make bail). Only after the video went viral did they drop the charges against the man, and charge the women. I say if you go around starting shit, you get what you get. When this lady in this video slapped the man, I would have liked to see him respond with a good right hook to the jaw. Lay this bitch out. Stay on her until the "real cops" show up. Make a citizens arrest if you have too. I'm tired of people thinking they are above the law because they are women, feminist, social justice warriors, etc. etc. No one should be above the law. Everyone has rights. You do not get to assault other people because you disagree with them or their viewpoints.

The woman in this video is an employee of the California department of corrections. She holds some position in the adult parole division. When someone works in that capacity, I do not think that it is too much to ask that said person be impartial. Every case should be determined on an individual basis. If this woman is going to stop her daily routine to harrass and assault someone who is only praying in a park, how can she be expected to be impartial in her job? Does she have some say in who does, and who does not get parole? If so, is she denying or revoking parole solely because the person is a Muslim? I am not clear exactly what her responsibilities are. If she does have some say in who gets parole, and whose parole gets revoked, than every case that she has been involved in needs to be investigated. We need to determine if she is using an anti- Muslim attitude (which she clearly has) in her decisions. This woman has no business working in the capacity that she is now working. Fire her ass. Prosecute her ass on assault and battery. If she does not want to go quietly, than add federal hate crime laws to the mix. I am not a fan of hate crime laws. I do not think that some one else's life is more important than my white cracker ass, just because they belong to the victim du jour of the month club. This woman's arrogant attitude is more than enough to make me want to see some enhanced penalties used in this case. She is a public employee that is violating that trust. If that makes me a hypocrite, oh well I will wear the label with pride.