[N_Fiddledog]

Suppose Andy's right and this phenomena of Muslim child sex grooming gangs is not presenting itself in London.

Wouldn't we want to know why?

If it was a virus wouldn't you study that behavior? Or would you say "No whatever is spreading the virus in the north and the midlands is the victim, because there are other viruses elsewhere not exhibiting that particular behaviour, so why single this one out? You're being virophobic."

[N_Fiddledog]

And after we figure that one out, we can ask ourselves why the rape statistics in Sweden suddenly skyrocketed about the same time as the surge of North African immigration, and why the sale of black hair dye magically rose with that phenomena.

Or maybe it doesn't matter, because it didn't also happen in Pouce Coupe. Right Andy?

[Zipperfish]

martin14 martin14:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

There don't seem to be a lot of arrests.

Rotherham ?

There haven't been any.

A lot of the files have gone 'missing'. I can't imagine how that happened.

There seems to be a lot of promises that were made to victims and not much in the way of follow-through.

[BartSimpson]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

martin14 martin14:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

There don't seem to be a lot of arrests.

Rotherham ?

There haven't been any.

A lot of the files have gone 'missing'. I can't imagine how that happened.

There seems to be a lot of promises that were made to victims and not much in the way of follow-through.

Of course not. The story isn't in the news anymore so there's no reason to keep the promises. Besides, actually acknowledging women who were victimized by moslems is offensive to moslems.

...and Andy.

[martin14]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

martin14 martin14:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

There don't seem to be a lot of arrests.

Rotherham ?

There haven't been any.

A lot of the files have gone 'missing'. I can't imagine how that happened.

There seems to be a lot of promises that were made to victims and not much in the way of follow-through.

Normal stuff for the white underclass.

And yet, they keep voting Labour.

[Zipperfish]

martin14 martin14:

Normal stuff for the white underclass.

And yet, they keep voting Labour.

Doesn't seem to be much difference over their. Could barely fit a piece of paper between Blair and Cameron.

Wouldn't be surprised if the vote swung from Labour to BNP without stopping at Conservative.

[PluggyRug]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Wouldn't be surprised if the vote swung from Labour to BNP without stopping at Conservative.

Talking to some of my buddies back in blighty, that pendulum has achieved a weapons grade swing.

[martin14]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

martin14 martin14:

Normal stuff for the white underclass.

And yet, they keep voting Labour.

Doesn't seem to be much difference over their. Could barely fit a piece of paper between Blair and Cameron.

Wouldn't be surprised if the vote swung from Labour to BNP without stopping at Conservative.

This is why everyone is so scared of Nigel Farage and Ukip.

And why they are all calling them racists and blah blah bleh.

[Zipperfish]

martin14 martin14:

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

martin14 martin14:

Normal stuff for the white underclass.

And yet, they keep voting Labour.

Doesn't seem to be much difference over their. Could barely fit a piece of paper between Blair and Cameron.

Wouldn't be surprised if the vote swung from Labour to BNP without stopping at Conservative.

This is why everyone is so scared of Nigel Farage and Ukip.

And why they are all calling them racists and blah blah bleh.

Actually I meant UKIP. D'oh! They are doing quite well.

[BartSimpson]

UKIP and the EDL are on a path to being a government before the end of this decade.

[ShepherdsDog]

Perhaps they should look at strengthening the Five Eyes into something more English Common law, a common language and history. Pax Anglia has a nice ring to it.

[Zipperfish]

ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog:

Perhaps they should look at strengthening the Five Eyes into something more English Common law, a common language and history. Pax Anglia has a nice ring to it.

I live in North Vancouver. A lrage ex-Brit demographic. I tell my buddies in Great Britain--"we're rebuilding the dream over here!"

North Van also has a high Iranian demographic. None of the associated beheading problems and such, because Persians are much more secular than other Muslim countries (even iof their leaders aren't), and plus because a lot the Iranians are Christians that fled the Ayatollah.

[Freakinoldguy]

Fuck the total number of white people in Britain this is about one specific area. Here's the demographics by race of the West Midlands and strangely enough it's mostly white.

West Midlands (region)

White British 79%
White Irish 1.0%
White: Irish Traveller/Gypsy[note 1] 4,734 0.1
White: Other 139,386 2.5

White: Total 4,633,669 82.7%

Asian or Asian British: Indian 218 439 3.9
Asian or Asian British: Pakistani 227,248 4.1
Asian or Asian British: Asian Other 74997 1.3
Asian or Asian British: Chinese 31,274 0.6

Asian or Asian British: Total 604,435 10.8%

So even if these numbers are off by quite a bit and still 75% of the pimps are Asian out of only approximately 10.8% of the population it's a pretty damning statistic that shows that they're the prime cause of the problem no matter what the political correct and socially acceptable crowd want us to think.

And for the record not even Wikipedia could fuck up the numbers enough to make the 75% out of 10.8% of the population statistic acceptable no matter how you spin it.

So, all the hand wringing and finger pointing to disprove that 75% scumbag statistic is nothing more than a smokescreen using the old adage "lies, damn lies, and statistics".


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Midlands_(region)#Ethnicity

[andyt]

What is a scumbag statistic is claiming that this 75% extrapolates to all of England, as Xort did. As the article I listed shows, in other areas it's other groups that are doing this, including whites.

So what's going on? Pick one small area of England - has 3 million out of 53 million people, and wring your panties in a knot about that area, but ignore all the others. Why? I think we know why, and what the agenda is. Also pick one element of child sexual exploitation, go on and on about it, ignore all the other ways that children are exploited in the same way, but not by street grooming gangs. Ignore all those other ways as well, as if other ways that men exploit children sexually are nothing to worry about. why? I think we know why, and what the agenda is.

How about some posts detailing all child sexual exploitation in England. Most of it is done by individuals, not gangs. A lot of it is done over the internet, ie the children are lured by internet contact first, not where they hang out at night. How come that doesn't merit a look, only one small area of England, one specific way that children are lured. Why? I think we know why and what the agenda is. The Daily Mail certainly isn't going to look at the big picture - they seem to be following the BNP agenda.

So FOG, what's got you all bent out of shape about street level grooming gangs in the West Midlands (Jeez, not enen the east, north and south midlands, just the west) but the other areas, who cares?

[Freakinoldguy]

andyt andyt:

What is a scumbag statistic is claiming that this 75% extrapolates to all of England, as Xort did. As the article I listed shows, in other areas it's other groups that are doing this, including whites.

So what's going on? Pick one small area of England - has 3 million out of 53 million people, and wring your panties in a knot about that area, but ignore all the others. Why? I think we know why, and what the agenda is. Also pick one element of child sexual exploitation, go on and on about it, ignore all the other ways that children are exploited in the same way, but not by street grooming gangs. Ignore all those other ways as well, as if other ways that men exploit children sexually are nothing to worry about. why? I think we know why, and what the agenda is.

How about some posts detailing all child sexual exploitation in England. Most of it is done by individuals, not gangs. A lot of it is done over the internet, ie the children are lured by internet contact first, not where they hang out at night. How come that doesn't merit a look, only one small area of England, one specific way that children are lured. Why? I think we know why and what the agenda is. The Daily Mail certainly isn't going to look at the big picture - they seem to be following the BNP agenda.

So FOG, what's got you all bent out of shape about street level grooming gangs in the West Midlands (Jeez, not enen the east, north and south midlands, just the west) but the other areas, who cares?

Nothing's got me bent out of shape but, what I do take umbrage to is your attempt to use statistics to dilute the fact that it's a specific group of people who are committing this crime in a very specific area.

My guess is that you'd have no trouble pointing out that in most other areas populated by a majority of white people it's the white people who are predominately committing these crimes oh wait, you already did that.

But, when it's pointed out that in the Midlands which is predominately white it's the "Asians" committing this crime you automatically become extremely defensive which seems to seems to show a remarkable lack of objectivity when it comes to any disparaging topics about anyone but white people.

BTW you're the one who went into defensive mode and began attacking whites because you, automatically associated the term "Asians" with "Muslims" which, if you re-read the article was never specified. But, if you're unfounded assumptions are actually correct then, the percentage of the midlands population that's responsible for committing this crime goes from 10.8% to 4.1% since the only "Asian" Muslims are likely to be Pakistani.

So, until you can explain away the fact of how 10.8% or 4.1% (depending on the accuracy of your assumptions) of the population of a certain area is responsible for committing 75% of a specific crime I'll standby my assertions.