[Jabberwalker]

BRAH BRAH:

Jabberwalker Jabberwalker:

BRAH BRAH:

The Tolerant Left!

That rant was brought to you by a Russian.

This post was brought to you by TDS LibTard, keep attacking my heritage loser.

A Russian couldn't possibly grasp concepts like "freedom of thought and action".

[BRAH]

___________________

Someone's Triggered! Keep it up your Tears are Delicious, MAGA!

[Jabberwalker]

BRAH BRAH:

___________________

Someone's Triggered! Keep it up your Tears are Delicious, MAGA!

... as if your twisted opinion is worth a pinch of rat shit ...

[BRAH]

________________________

[Coach85]

Who’s triggered now?

Those 9th grade memes really help make your point.

[BeaverFever]

BRAH BRAH:

________________________

MAGA idiots don’t even know what decade the civil rights struggle happened in. Not surprising since the those southern segregationist Democrats defected to the Republican Party 50 years ago

[rickc]

Why can we not debate the topic without insulting each other? A money paying customer who was not bothering anyone was asked to leave an establishment that is open to the public because of who she works for. How can anyone agree with this?

[BeaverFever]

rickc rickc:

Why can we not debate the topic without insulting each other? A money paying customer who was not bothering anyone was asked to leave an establishment that is open to the public because of who she works for. How can anyone agree with this?

But it’s ok if they’re gay? Or if they’re transgender and have to use the bathroom?

IMO You can deny service to someone you think is an asshole. As Thanos already said judge them by the content of their character.

[Coach85]

rickc rickc:

Why can we not debate the topic without insulting each other? A money paying customer who was not bothering anyone was asked to leave an establishment that is open to the public because of who she works for. How can anyone agree with this?

When a customer is refused service because of who they love, and it's widely support within the GOP, we can't be upset when someone is asked to leave because of who she works for and what she stands for.

It can't work both ways.

[Thanos]

rickc rickc:

It is time to put to rest these myths that businesses can reserve the right to refuse service to anyone.
https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/ ... rvice.html
You see we have these things called "laws". You can print up all signs you want to. That would be called a "policy". Policy does not trump law. We used to have all kinds of signs on display like: white only, Irish need not apply, etc., etc. You do not see to many of them around today because of this little thing called the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I would like to think that all those people who were getting their heads bashed in by batons, being bit by police dogs, and having fire hoses used on them did not suffer in vain. If you cannot refuse service based on how someone looks, you should not be able to refuse service based on their beliefs or legal occupation. Where does this end? Do we get to refuse service because someone is wearing the jersey of an opposing team? Hey they are not a minority or gay, so they are fair game right? Open war on the unprotected classes. If you are open for business to the public than you should have to serve everyone who is not causing a scene. This woman was eating her meal in peace, not bothering anyone. The owner is being a major c***! There should be some legal repercussions for her.

Most of today's conservative right-wing extremists want to see the Civil Rights Acts entirely abolished so things can go back to the way they were under Jim Crow. This time they're doing in with bullshit libertarian-esque arguments as opposed to the old racism. The situation is the same though now as it was back then. Through gerrymandering and kicking legitimate voters off the registration lists they've succeeded in creating an electoral map where the votes of Republicans are worth twice as much as their opponents, as verified by less than 100,000 morons in a handful of counties in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania who voted for Trump negating the overall number of votes cast nationwide for Clinton.

65 million votes lost to 62 million by their opponents, all thanks to a rigging of the map in the favour of one side. Yeah, that's some "world's greatest" democracy with it's free and fair elections.

[rickc]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

rickc rickc:

Why can we not debate the topic without insulting each other? A money paying customer who was not bothering anyone was asked to leave an establishment that is open to the public because of who she works for. How can anyone agree with this?

But it’s ok if they’re gay? Or if they’re transgender and have to use the bathroom?

IMO You can deny service to someone you think is an asshole. As Thanos already said judge them by the content of their character.

It is not ok to refuse service if they are gay. There is an important difference in the bakery case, one that was acknowledged by the SCOTUS (if I reading their decision correctly). No one can be forced to create something for someone else. Lets say there is a donut shop and the owner tells someone: "hey fag, get out of my store". That would be discrimination. That would be unlawfully refusing service to someone. If a customer brought in a recipe and asked the baker to whip him up a batch of donuts using his recipe, the baker is free to refuse the request. If an artist specializes in seascapes, he cannot be forced to do a nude painting of someone. Just because the person making the request is gay does not make it discrimination. I cannot force a musician to record a song for me. The baker should not be forced to make a gay wedding cake any more than he should be forced to make one lynching a black person, or one saying kill all the fags. There IS a difference in refusing someone service and forcing an artist to create against their will.

In your opinion you can deny service to someone you think is an asshole? Your opinion flies in the face of law. Law TRUMPS your opinion, (pun intended) . Disagreeing with some one's politics does not give you the right to refuse them service.

[Thanos]

And here's the Huckabee creature's response when asked about the multiple provable fact-checked lies the POS POTUS that she speaks for tells on a daily basis:

[BeaverFever]

rickc rickc:

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

rickc rickc:

Why can we not debate the topic without insulting each other? A money paying customer who was not bothering anyone was asked to leave an establishment that is open to the public because of who she works for. How can anyone agree with this?

But it’s ok if they’re gay? Or if they’re transgender and have to use the bathroom?

IMO You can deny service to someone you think is an asshole. As Thanos already said judge them by the content of their character.

It is not ok to refuse service if they are gay. There is an important difference in the bakery case, one that was acknowledged by the SCOTUS (if I reading their decision correctly). No one can be forced to create something for someone else. Lets say there is a donut shop and the owner tells someone: "hey fag, get out of my store". That would be discrimination. That would be unlawfully refusing service to someone. If a customer brought in a recipe and asked the baker to whip him up a batch of donuts using his recipe, the baker is free to refuse the request. If an artist specializes in seascapes, he cannot be forced to do a nude painting of someone. Just because the person making the request is gay does not make it discrimination. I cannot force a musician to record a song for me. The baker should not be forced to make a gay wedding cake any more than he should be forced to make one lynching a black person, or one saying kill all the fags. There IS a difference in refusing someone service and forcing an artist to create against their will.

In your opinion you can deny service to someone you think is an asshole? Your opinion flies in the face of law. Law TRUMPS your opinion, (pun intended) . Disagreeing with some one's politics does not give you the right to refuse them service.

So nobody wanted to create a meal for ms. Sanders.

Hmm maybe They need to follow starbucks lead and close for a day for sensitivity training to prevent right wing snowflake hurt feelings

[rickc]

Coach85 Coach85:

rickc rickc:

Why can we not debate the topic without insulting each other? A money paying customer who was not bothering anyone was asked to leave an establishment that is open to the public because of who she works for. How can anyone agree with this?

When a customer is refused service because of who they love, and it's widely support within the GOP, we can't be upset when someone is asked to leave because of who she works for and what she stands for.

It can't work both ways.

We SHOULD be upset for both. The generation before mine risked their lives, liberty, and careers to change things for the better. Are we going to throw that all away now? If someone wants to hang around with people that look and think exactly like they do than they can open a private club, or invite them over to their private residence. When someone opens a business that is open to the public than they are subject to the laws of the land. They do not get to pick and choose who gets to patronize the establishment. This battle was fought and won a long time ago.

[rickc]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

So nobody wanted to create a meal for ms. Sanders.

Hmm maybe They need to follow starbucks lead and close for a day for sensitivity training to prevent right wing snowflake hurt feelings

To be honest, I expect better from you than this. The very fabric of society is unraveling before us with this type of behavior. We have already had one civil war, we do not need another one. This every one for themselves way of thinking is BS. Are we going to have to put red and blue symbols on all of our businesses and establishments to show who is allowed to do business? Where does it end? Can airlines deny passengers? Car rentals? Concert halls and sporting venues? I would not close her down for one day for reflection. I would shut her down permanently to make an example out of her. I would yank her liquor license and business license. I would do the same to any business that refused to serve minorities or gays. I would nip this shit in the bud right now. If you are open to the public than you are open to ALL of the public. You do not get to pick and choose your customers, they choose you.