Scape Scape:
I wonder if they realise they contradict themselves in this video. I'd assume not.
First they say there is an FBI presence at the capitol. That's not what the NYT said. An informant is not FBI, nor does it constitute a presence of federal agents.
Second they say that there were more feds than perpetrators in the Michigan Governor plot. This is weird because a) there doesn't appear to be a number of feds released who were part of it, unless they are
lying and claiming informants are feds. They aren't. There also wasn't more than them, there were 12 informants, and 13 people under investigation. Additionally, do we care if it's 5 agents or 50 if it stops a terrorist attack and the head of a state government being kidnapped and/or murdered?
But the weirdest part, is they then go on about how there were informants at the rally, but they did nothing to stop it. This is odd because they just shit on the FBI for putting resources forward to stop a Governor from being kidnapped. But then simultaneously shit on them for not putting resources forward to stop the Jan 6 riot. Which do you want? It's also weird be crapping on the FBI for not moving forward at all during the Jan 6 riots for a few reasons. 1) the Director is a trump appointee. 2) they report directly to the attorney general, who would be Barr. Also a Trump sycophant. And 3) by their own admission, the informant only told them that they were just caught up in the mob. So if there wasn't any sort of pre-plan.. how is the FBI supposed to stop it? Should they have deployed resources to the capitol building, something that isn't really under their jurisdiction?
Krystal and Sagaar genuinely aren't very intelligent.