[CharlesAnthony]

As long as the plebs are directing their attention at the Puppet In Chief, then all is good.

[N_Fiddledog]

Robair Robair:

I nominate fiddle for tinfoil hat medal.

Why? Because I dare to say I don't trust Google either?

You're going to need some knee pads if you ever visit the Google front office, I think.

[raydan]

Google Google on the wall, am I the greatest President of them all?

[Thanos]

[fifeboy]

Thanos Thanos:

Hell, I googled the same thing with my name and got no results. You can't imagine how much better your post has made me feel

[raydan]

Some idiot uses my name for his medieval counterpart in reenactments... so when I googled the same thing with my name I get a Youtube Glaive fight.

[Thanos]

It would be way worse though if you Googled yourself and got directed right to Grindr. Or a good thing depending on your interests. Who am I to judge?

[raydan]

I had to Google Grindr... kinda wish I hadn't.

[Thanos]

Half of the posts on Grindr originate from Quebec!

Just kidding. Your good works on the Hotties thread have ensured that you're a regular mensch for the rest of forever.

[BeaverFever]

Thanos Thanos:

It would be way worse though if you Googled yourself and got directed right to Grindr. Or a good thing depending on your interests. Who am I to judge?

Somebody please make a Trump profile on Grindr!

[BartSimpson]

Zipperfish Zipperfish:

Well I imagine the President thinks...

Exactly. You're making shit up and then getting angry as if it were real. Knock it off.

[Prof_Chomsky]

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Funny, when the Guardian accused Google of right wing bias I don't recall anyone calling the Guardian a bunch of paranoids.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... propaganda

So, you're saying that Google has a right wing bias, annnnnnd a left wing bias.
Gotcha. Totally logical.

Meanwhile outside the tinfoil hat:

[DrCaleb]

Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Funny, when the Guardian accused Google of right wing bias I don't recall anyone calling the Guardian a bunch of paranoids.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... propaganda

So, you're saying that Google has a right wing bias, annnnnnd a left wing bias.
Gotcha. Totally logical.

I don't understand why Google is even perceived to have a bias. They only collect what others write, and display it based on your own personal preferences and history. If there is bias, it's your own bias reflected in the results.

[BartSimpson]

Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Funny, when the Guardian accused Google of right wing bias I don't recall anyone calling the Guardian a bunch of paranoids.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... propaganda

So, you're saying that Google has a right wing bias, annnnnnd a left wing bias.
Gotcha. Totally logical.

First, if you haven't noticed I get really, really irate when people play the "So you're saying" game with me.

That's where YOU say something and blame ME for it.

Kindly do not do this with with me again.

I said what I said. Anything else is in your imagination.

[Prof_Chomsky]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

Prof_Chomsky Prof_Chomsky:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Funny, when the Guardian accused Google of right wing bias I don't recall anyone calling the Guardian a bunch of paranoids.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... propaganda

So, you're saying that Google has a right wing bias, annnnnnd a left wing bias.
Gotcha. Totally logical.

I don't understand why Google is even perceived to have a bias. They only collect what others write, and display it based on your own personal preferences and history. If there is bias, it's your own bias reflected in the results.

That's exactly the point. If they did create some conspiracy theorist's wet dream of an algorithm that intentionally tainted political and news results to suit their interests, not only would they be dismantled by both the left and right through legal means, but you'd be able to easily prove it.

Trumpers though. They know better cause they read some article written by a lumberjack in his underwear eating beef jerky, on DarkWebTruth.com. So I mean, how do you argue with logic like that?

Science and facts bad.
Opinions good.