|
Posts: 7580
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:21 am
bout time
|
Posts: 7580
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:21 am
|
Posts: 154
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:21 am
tougher sentences on young offenders would be good, but i highly doubt much would get through by the Supreme Court of Canada
|
CommanderSock
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2664
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:56 am
$1: tougher sentences on young offenders would be good, but i highly doubt much would get through by the Supreme Court of Canada
Good! Actually this is not so bad, I'm strictly against mandatory minimum sentencing though.
|
Posts: 806
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:46 am
CommanderSock CommanderSock: $1: tougher sentences on young offenders would be good, but i highly doubt much would get through by the Supreme Court of Canada
Good! Actually this is not so bad, I'm strictly against mandatory minimum sentencing though. Does the Justice Minister keep in contact with you to ensure compliance with what you are against ?
|
ridenrain
CKA Uber
Posts: 22594
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:24 pm
Track the criminals, not the inanimate tools? What a new fangled idea. Next, I suppose that probation will actualy mean something..
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:49 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Fri Feb 21, 2025 11:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:56 pm
Crap, now I have to rush my crimes.
|
CommanderSock
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2664
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:01 pm
$1: Does the Justice Minister keep in contact with you to ensure compliance with what you are against ?
No, but it determines who I might vote for in the future.
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:03 pm
CommanderSock CommanderSock: $1: Does the Justice Minister keep in contact with you to ensure compliance with what you are against ?
No, but it determines who I might vote for in the future. might?..oh now that's a real mystery ain't it? 
|
CommanderSock
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2664
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:09 pm
$1:
might?..oh now that's a real mystery ain't it?
Not really, I don't like Dion, I would've happily voted Harper if he keeps the Christian right wing morals out of parliament and focuses more on the economy.
|
Posts: 7580
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:19 pm
CommanderSock CommanderSock: $1:
might?..oh now that's a real mystery ain't it?
Not really, I don't like Dion, I would've happily voted Harper if he keeps the Christian right wing morals out of parliament and focuses more on the economy. Well we all know that ain't going to happen... right wing, fundamentalist bible thumping rednecked, homophobic, self righteous, autocratic, george wya ass licker isnt about to change any time soon... 
|
CommanderSock
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2664
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:20 pm
$1:
Well we all know that aint going to happen... right wing, bible thumping rednecked, homophobic, self righteous, autocratic, george wya ass licker isnt about to change any time soon...
If they slowly get rid of the Alliance side of the Conservative party we might actually see progress.
|
Demian_164
Active Member
Posts: 272
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:26 pm
kenmore kenmore: CommanderSock CommanderSock: $1:
might?..oh now that's a real mystery ain't it?
Not really, I don't like Dion, I would've happily voted Harper if he keeps the Christian right wing morals out of parliament and focuses more on the economy. Well we all know that ain't going to happen... right wing, fundamentalist bible thumping rednecked, homophobic, self righteous, autocratic, george wya ass licker isnt about to change any time soon...  Instead, lets vote in the apologetic left, and invite into the country a bunch of right wing, fundamentalist, Quran thumping, long bearded, homophobic, self righteous, autocratic mohammed ass lickers. Christianity bashing is getting old. And im not even a Christian.
|
|
Page 1 of 2
|
[ 16 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests |
|
|