PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
Hey, I'm not exactly thrilled with the stance Trump has taken but I'm also not willing to give Turd-boy in Ottawa a free pass just because he's Canada's PM. He and Freeland completely screwed the pooch on the NAFTA re-negotiations.
Incorrect.
$1:
They acted like petulant children when Trump told them to shove their ideological nonsense and couldn't get their way and are now whining about Trump acting like a petulant child who isn't getting his way. Seriously, how the fuck are you not seeing it?
Because I see it for what it is. Unlike you. It is a very tried and tested rebuttal to Trump's preferred negotiation tactic. Which, I am sure you have factored into your analysis.
$1:
Were you unaware of the initial bad faith position Trudeau took? Or are you simply a politician's favourite kind of voter? One with no memory.
Bad faith from who's claim? A US entertainment company, or would that be from the opposite side's negotiating team?
Canada's official position (the only one that matters during the negotiations) has stayed consistent.
$1:
Read the link I posted.
Sorry, I flush when I am done with my tp. You should do the same. It is a compilation of what the adversary wants us to do, and you read it as gospel.
$1:
It's not a big deal to re-negotiate a trade agreement that's been in place for years. Things change over time and trade agreements need to change with them. But when you enter those re-negotiations from a bad faith position right off the hop, when you try to force your ideology onto another country via an existing trade agreement, you're obviously not serious about re-negotiating. Something the Canadian media was quite willing to criticize Trudeau for. It's funny too because when you go to search for Canadian media accounts of it now, they're f*cking buried in an avalanche of anti-Trump tirades by media outlets who suddenly forgot what a twit Trudeau is because their insatiable desire to push the anti-Trump narrative is just so much stronger.
Only one player entered the NAFTA negotiations in bad faith, and it was not Trudeau.
$1:
I swear, Trump could personally cure cancer tomorrow and the bleating morons would decry the loss of jobs in cancer research.
And Trump could start executing his trade people in public, and you would still be here to defend his virtues.
Not that it is likely, since he can't master a fake tan, but if Trump actually did something noble, I would sing his praises. I am just not naive enough to believe that a mob boss will turn into a saint.
$1:
Trudeau told reporters that imposing retaliatory measures “is not something I relish doing” but that he wouldn’t hesitate to do so because “I will always protect Canadian workers and Canadian interests.”
Except when it comes to the Chinese. Just more duplicity from the little Turd.[/quote]
Each country has to be dealt with in the form that shows the highest efficacy. Since you are an expert, what is a medium sized, resource based economies efficacy in trade negotiations with China, utilizing a distributive negotiation tactic?