The state should give him a reward for saving the tax payers the cost of the trial and having to house his sorry ass in jail again. The dead dude had 29 counts against him and was out of jail only three days from his last stint in the slammer for auto theft.
I'm waiting for the dead guy's family to sue for the attack being a "hate crime"
PublicAnimalNo9
CKA Uber
Posts: 14139
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 10:21 pm
travior travior:
I'm waiting for the dead guy's family to sue for the attack being a "hate crime"
Yeah no doubt, the civil law system is even more fucked than the criminal law system
Scape
CKA Moderator
Posts: 35279
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:31 pm
This just in Video:
QBall
Forum Super Elite
Posts: 2398
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:13 am
$1:
"When he said that, the suspect lunged at him, kind of forced the kid against the wall, and he struck him with the sword," Guglielmi said.
Lunge at the guy with the sword!! I say write "Suicide" on the moron's death certificate and move on.
ASLplease
CKA Elite
Posts: 4183
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:37 am
a man's house is his castle.
Brenda
CKA Uber
Posts: 50938
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:46 am
The dead guy should not complain. After all, what someone does to another persons body, is freedom of expression anyway
Mukluk
Forum Junkie
Posts: 718
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 6:03 pm
I wonder if he made a "hiYAH!" or "waaaaaah" (higher pitched and a bit winey) sound when he cut the guy in half?
/m
Freakinoldguy
CKA Uber
Posts: 14747
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:20 pm
ASLplease ASLplease:
a man's house is his castle.
From all appearances..... so is his garage.
Hyack
Site Admin
Posts: 19986
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:41 pm
Severed him right...
ridenrain
CKA Uber
Posts: 22594
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:07 pm
So almost everyone agrees that he was in his right to defend himself with a sword but how many would change their opinions if he defended himself with a legal shotgun, rifle or pistol?
Brenda
CKA Uber
Posts: 50938
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:09 pm
ridenrain ridenrain:
So almost everyone agrees that he was in his right to defend himself with a sword but how many would change their opinions if he defended himself with a legal shotgun, rifle or pistol?
I don't agree... With either. Because I think a burglar does not deserve the death penalty.
Gunnair
CKA Uber
Posts: 23565
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:11 pm
ridenrain ridenrain:
So almost everyone agrees that he was in his right to defend himself with a sword but how many would change their opinions if he defended himself with a legal shotgun, rifle or pistol?
He has the 'right' to defend himself if he can prove that he was threatened with grievous bodily harm or death.
ridenrain
CKA Uber
Posts: 22594
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:26 pm
Brenda. You dodge. Should the defender face manslaughter charges because he caused death by accident?
Please remember that he swung the sword when the burgler rushed him, chopping off a hand in the process. The death was an accident. If he felt his life was in danger and had to defend himself, I think he would be right reguardless of what he used... short of a tank.
CKA Super Elite 
CKA Uber 
