| |
roger-roger
CKA Super Elite
Posts: 5164
 Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:25 am
She should get nothing, its not hard to get a marrage license.
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:35 am
only costs 50 million and 56k a month 
|
roger-roger
CKA Super Elite
Posts: 5164
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:39 am
She is just trying to cash in on the guy. If they had a child together, fine he pays for the child support that's all. There must have been a reason they did not get formally married, to me it sounds like she was a gold digging bitch, and that would be a good reason not to get hitched with her.
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:48 am
billionaire = smart guy or at least a good lawyer.
|
Posts: 15102
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:00 am
Must be a bitter singles guy meeting in here.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:04 am
Hahahahahahaha
|
Brenda
CKA Uber
Posts: 50938
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:07 am
So those 3 kids are his too, right?
I dunno, but it sounds to me that Quebec is making a moron out of itself... again...
|
roger-roger
CKA Super Elite
Posts: 5164
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:12 am
I think it should be like this across the board, if you want half of your spouses crap when you break up sign a marriage license. If he or she wont do it, then maybe you should think about your relationship together... 
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:13 am
She's a gold digger. If she had asked for reasonable alimony, this wouldn't be so ridiculous, but 56 k per month is stupid. Plus the 50 mil. That's complete bullshit.
|
Posts: 4914
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:26 am
your right,but knowing Canada and our legal system, they will settle on a much more reasonable 10 million and 25K per month. After all, she 'needs' to be recognized doesn't she? 
|
Brenda
CKA Uber
Posts: 50938
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:30 am
Well, guys, excuse me, but... if it would be like that in the rest of the country, why not in Quebec? If it would be like that if they were married, why not now? What is the difference between being married, or living in a common law relationship?
(Oh, for your info... if she had been loaded, and he would have been asking for this, I would have said the same.)
|
roger-roger
CKA Super Elite
Posts: 5164
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:35 am
New Brunswick has something similar to Quebec I think, but I am not sure. Thats why I tend to get nervous when a woman has lived with me for more then 4 months. Married says you are willing to commit the rest of your life (at the time) to this person. Common law says, "meh Im too lazy and/or cheap to file for a marriage license."
I would say the same thing if it was some cheap prick trying to mooch off a wealthy woman.
Last edited by roger-roger on Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 33691
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:36 am
Brenda Brenda: Well, guys, excuse me, but... if it would be like that in the rest of the country, why not in Quebec? If it would be like that if they were married, why not now? What is the difference between being married, or living in a common law relationship?
(Oh, for your info... if she had been loaded, and he would have been asking for this, I would have said the same.) Quebec has a different civil code, cause they are 'special' 
|
Brenda
CKA Uber
Posts: 50938
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:39 am
martin14 martin14: Brenda Brenda: Well, guys, excuse me, but... if it would be like that in the rest of the country, why not in Quebec? If it would be like that if they were married, why not now? What is the difference between being married, or living in a common law relationship?
(Oh, for your info... if she had been loaded, and he would have been asking for this, I would have said the same.) Quebec has a different civil code, cause they are 'special' I know, they should be in the bus... Stupid morons Oops, am I being politically incorrect now? 
|
 
|
Page 1 of 4
|
[ 60 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests |
|
|
CKA Uber 
