PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:
DrCaleb DrCaleb:
So, it's not a wise thing to pay for services not offered in Canada if they are offered elsewhere;
I'm gonna stop you right there. The services ARE and WERE offered in Ontario. Here was the problem. The people of southwestern Ontario were promised that those who needed chronic heart care would be able to go to London. When London filled up, they were told no problem, they can go to Toronto. Then Toronto filled up. Meanwhile, Windsor had 4 goddam hospitals and no chronic heart care. So Ontario most definitely had chronic heart care facilities at the time. It's not a case of the services simply not existing, it was a case of the govt not giving a shit. Windsor isn't part of the Ottawa-London corridor so as usual it got ignored by the govt until they couldn't ignore it anymore. And even then their only solution was to pass the buck. Thankfully, the Detroit hospitals who agreed to help out didn't mind that the buck was a Canadian dollar.
Like I wrote, the service - if full - is not offered. If we don't have the capacity at specialists for our own patients, then we have to look elsewhere.
You can't just advertise for new heart specialists, and have them in a couple months. If there is a shortage, it takes about 12 years of training to get new specialists.
If they are available the other side of the bridge, but in another country, is it not a prudent idea to pay to have Canadian patients seen by US specialists to reduce the burden on our few specialists?
And I still don't see how it relates to drug prices south of the border, when both drugs are available in both countries and from the same companies. Just at different prices.