CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:21 am
 


<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=26973" target="_blank">Scientists say get ready for a hotter planet</a> (click to view)

<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/news/topic/9-science" target="_blank">Science</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=Hyack" target="_blank">Hyack</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2007-11-09 10:04:37
<strong>Canadian</strong>


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 San Jose Sharks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 876
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:21 am
 


not good news for us on planet earth


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 221
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 10:38 pm
 


Rubbish.
Prepare for a Ice Age is closer to the truth.

No money to be made by fraudsters in that scenario just yet. Wait a decade or so before we switch tacks.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:18 pm
 


Well, it's certainly toasty here right now....31 C, but the air is crystal clear and there is a nice breeze.


Offline
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 San Jose Sharks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 876
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:30 pm
 


Istanbul Istanbul:
Rubbish.
Prepare for a Ice Age is closer to the truth.

No money to be made by fraudsters in that scenario just yet. Wait a decade or so before we switch tacks.


Do you think it is a conspiracy ?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 5737
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:45 am
 


$1:
Do you think it is a conspiracy ?

In a manner of speaking...more like GROUP THINK

The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM. The MSM has largely succeeded in keeping the truth about the discredited IPCC in silence. The MSM trumpeted/spun the BALI conference as a success while in reality it was the KYOTO process funeral.

Policy makers do not rely on the NY Times, GISS, NAS, or the IPCC as informations sources.


Last edited by sasquatch2 on Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 8:54 am
 


Concurrently, other scientists are warning of a more dangerous cooling trend.

http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.a ... 0218a.html


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14063
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:12 am
 


sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 5737
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 9:56 am
 


Blue_Nose

$1:
sasquatch2 wrote:
$1:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.

...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?


Spin Spin.
My point was why would a graph with "anomolies" be presented as an indication of temperature trend with a misleading component---that is "anomolies" rather than temperatures? Answer.....to demonstrate a non-exitant trend to the unwary.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 3646
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:00 am
 


I predict the sky will fall with in a decade or so.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14063
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:00 am
 


sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
Blue_Nose

$1:
sasquatch2 wrote:
$1:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.

...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?


Spin Spin.
My point was why would a graph with "anomolies" be presented as an indication of temperature trend with a misleading component---that is "anomolies" rather than temperatures? Answer.....to demonstrate a non-exitant trend to the unwary.
Tsk, tsk - still never bothered to actually determine what the term "anomaly" actually means, did you? That might explain why you abandoned the other thread when I showed up, but continue to spout your ignorance here.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite


GROUP_AVATAR
Profile
Posts: 3646
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:02 am
 


I will be like Nostrodamus abnd predict there will be a major catastrophie in a major city some where in the world in the next decade. :roll:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 12398
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:07 am
 


Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?


One thing which concerns me about that graph is, how it's (the graph) creators determined the "mean" value.
One would have to go so far back in time, in-fact, to a time when average temperature measurements could not have possibly been taken.


Last edited by PluggyRug on Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:09 am
 


ManifestDestiny ManifestDestiny:
I will be like Nostrodamus abnd predict there will be a major catastrophie in a major city some where in the world in the next decade. :roll:


OMG!!!! 8O

We should give all our money to the UN because of this!!!!


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 10:12 am
 


PluggyRug PluggyRug:
Blue_Nose Blue_Nose:
sasquatch2 sasquatch2:
The IPCCs credibility has been so thoroughly trashed that no one takes them seriously except the MSM.
...and who takes you seriously, Mr. "anomalies aren't on a temperature scale"?


One thing which concerns me about that graph is, how it's (the graph) creators determined the "mean" value.
One would have to go so far back in time, in-fact, to a time when average temperature measurements could not have possibly been taken.


Indeed.

If I do a graph starting with 1998 then I can show that the world is cooling and that 2007 was well below 'average'. :idea:


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.