[Wullu]

Anonymous Anonymous:

Hey, it´s the old angry white christian man's club again! Ya! Let´s go kill a bunny, lynch a Moslem (or any other race and religion not white nor X-tian), and then we can group together for a big huge circle-jerk and hypoctritically complain aboooot queers, eh! Nice site you folks have, thank god we´re not LIBRANOS, eh!

Well ol Anon, you are now going to have to go turn yourself into the CHRC and plead guilty for offending a minority. I am an atheist, not a Christian.

[Pimpbrewski]

It's quite easy actually. Only wanted to test this out.

I am not the original Anonymous.

Basically, you go into the comment section of the article (on the front page) then add whatever comments.

[Bacardi4206]

That's bullshit >.<, PETA doesn't take in animals. They aren't the pound that takes in animals, and finds them homes, etc. PETA strictly fights for animal rights and that's it. Also I have no doubt that PETA could raise 30 million, many famous celebrities do PETA commercials for free and go to many of the PETA awarness parties or w/e they have. Pretty much every famous female actress has been there, people like Pamela Anderson does a lot of free PETA posters, and commercials or whatever they want.

Still, PETA doesn't take in animals. I still don't understand how they can kill them? Doesn't seem possible to me, they would have to have some sort of facility that operates like the pound, where they grab stray animals. Fix them, give them there shots and adopt them to a family. Last time I checked, PETA doesn't have such a facility, from my knowledge PETA is strictly a animal rights organization. Nothing more.

This article is a load of a bullshit.

[Pimpbrewski]

Pimpbrewski Pimpbrewski:

It's quite easy actually. Only wanted to test this out.

I am not the original Anonymous.

Basically, you go into the comment section of the article (on the front page) then add whatever comments.

I guess it did not say Anonymous cause I was logged in.

Either way, if you are not logged in, it works.

[mtbr]

Pimpbrewski Pimpbrewski:

Pimpbrewski Pimpbrewski:

It's quite easy actually. Only wanted to test this out.

I am not the original Anonymous.

Basically, you go into the comment section of the article (on the front page) then add whatever comments.

I guess it did not say Anonymous cause I was logged in.

Either way, if you are not logged in, it works.

thats BS just like poll rigging

[Wullu]

Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:

That's bullshit >.<, PETA doesn't take in animals. They aren't the pound that takes in animals, and finds them homes, etc. PETA strictly fights for animal rights and that's it. Also I have no doubt that PETA could raise 30 million, many famous celebrities do PETA commercials for free and go to many of the PETA awarness parties or w/e they have. Pretty much every famous female actress has been there, people like Pamela Anderson does a lot of free PETA posters, and commercials or whatever they want.

Still, PETA doesn't take in animals. I still don't understand how they can kill them? Doesn't seem possible to me, they would have to have some sort of facility that operates like the pound, where they grab stray animals. Fix them, give them there shots and adopt them to a family. Last time I checked, PETA doesn't have such a facility, from my knowledge PETA is strictly a animal rights organization. Nothing more.

This article is a load of a bullshit.

PETA does not take in animals?

Their annual report to the state of Virginia would seem to say otherwise. Note the "Organization Type"

Link


Seems, that if the owner does not claim them, then off to the needle they go.

[romanP]

PETA does take in animals, and does euthanise a lot of them.

PETA is probably the dumbest NGO in America today.

Every vegetarian I know thinks they're a pack of retards.

[sasquatch2]

YES, YES AND YES!

[martin14]

i thought i had no respect for PETA..

i was RIGHT !!!

[Toro]

Wullu Wullu:

Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:

That's bullshit >.<, PETA doesn't take in animals. They aren't the pound that takes in animals, and finds them homes, etc. PETA strictly fights for animal rights and that's it. Also I have no doubt that PETA could raise 30 million, many famous celebrities do PETA commercials for free and go to many of the PETA awarness parties or w/e they have. Pretty much every famous female actress has been there, people like Pamela Anderson does a lot of free PETA posters, and commercials or whatever they want.

Still, PETA doesn't take in animals. I still don't understand how they can kill them? Doesn't seem possible to me, they would have to have some sort of facility that operates like the pound, where they grab stray animals. Fix them, give them there shots and adopt them to a family. Last time I checked, PETA doesn't have such a facility, from my knowledge PETA is strictly a animal rights organization. Nothing more.

This article is a load of a bullshit.

PETA does not take in animals?

Their annual report to the state of Virginia would seem to say otherwise. Note the "Organization Type"

Link


Seems, that if the owner does not claim them, then off to the needle they go.

[TattoodGirl]

Its really a horrible way to slap PETA supporters in the face, but can I say "I told ya so" ....I am totally against killing animals for sport, for fur, if you intend to eat the animal and use its pelt Im entirely for it. I am completely against testing makeup and superficial products on animals as well. But PETA goes way over the top of trying to get their point heard.

PETA is and has always been one big money grab...

[Freakinoldguy]

PluggyRug PluggyRug:

mtbr mtbr:

Anonymous Anonymous:

Hey, it´s the old angry white christian man's club again! Ya! Let´s go kill a bunny, lynch a Moslem (or any other race and religion not white nor X-tian), and then we can group together for a big huge circle-jerk and hypoctritically complain aboooot queers, eh! Nice site you folks have, thank god we´re not LIBRANOS, eh!

I would like to know how this person can post under anonymous.

Well cowards usually wish to remain anonymous. Maybe it's a PETA supporter.

Probably but given the unusual and somewhat incoherent rant, my guess is that it'd might be Pam Anderson after another night with Tommy Lee.

[ShepherdsDog]

As fatbasturd put it so eloquently

People Eat Tasty Animals

[-Mario-]

Delwin Delwin:

The animals are killed based on overflow, there is no way to avoid it.

97% overflow ... one hell of an overflow. That sound like bull shit to me and very avoidable. How could someone be off the ball by such a huge margin. I could see if they rescued some animals and some of them were beyond saving. With the amount of money they probably could get their own animal shelters.