CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:23 pm
 


<strong>Title: </strong> <a href="/link.php?id=28867" target="_blank">Out of Kandahar by 2009, Liberals say</a> (click to view)

<strong>Category:</strong> <a href="/news/topic/1-political" target="_blank">Political</a>
<strong>Posted By: </strong> <a href="/modules.php?name=Your_Account&op=userinfo&username=-Mario-" target="_blank">-Mario-</a>
<strong>Date: </strong> 2008-01-09 06:46:00
<strong>Canadian</strong>


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
Profile
Posts: 62
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:23 pm
 


Harper sent those troops into battle ill-equiped, to be picked off like flies. These guys should be here in Canada being heroes in disasters like the Ice Storm. Afghanistan is a military dead-end.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15102
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:29 am
 


philowl philowl:
Harper sent those troops into battle ill-equiped, to be picked off like flies. These guys should be here in Canada being heroes in disasters like the Ice Storm. Afghanistan is a military dead-end.
You had better do some research then come back and revise your statement.





PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:02 am
 


philowl philowl:
Harper sent those troops into battle ill-equiped, to be picked off like flies. These guys should be here in Canada being heroes in disasters like the Ice Storm. Afghanistan is a military dead-end.


Harper? you have an incredibly short memory or is it a selective memory?


Offline
Forum Junkie
Forum Junkie


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 619
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:49 am
 


philowl philowl:
Harper sent those troops into battle ill-equiped, to be picked off like flies. These guys should be here in Canada being heroes in disasters like the Ice Storm. Afghanistan is a military dead-end.


A yes another quote from an under-educated armchair general.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35279
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 11:54 am
 


The kit currently being sent isn't that bad. Always room for improvement and the Helo's are a bone to pick for example but overall they have what they need for now till 09. After that, who knows it will be a dead end if the Afgan people don't start putting their backs into this effort. It is their country after all.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 22594
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:26 pm
 


philowl philowl:
Harper sent those troops into battle ill-equiped, to be picked off like flies. These guys should be here in Canada being heroes in disasters like the Ice Storm. Afghanistan is a military dead-end.


Un-be-freak'n-leaveable!

This must be the NDP's official version because who else could be so stupid to mistake a professional fighting army for municipal workers.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4117
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:48 pm
 


I think we should stay there, if we get involved in something. We should stick it out to the end, no matter what the costs are in lives. If we just leave, the next generation will just find themselves back there doing our job for us, picking up where we left off. Hasn't history taught us anything? America entered Iraq, liberated them from a dictator, took out the countries police, army etc in the process of doing so. There country turned into complete chaos afterwards. Now there is so many theories about 9/11, I am still undecided what to believe but whatever the case is, attacks like 9/11 can happen to anybody anywhere when there is no stability in a country.

America is now back there, after they were attacked to finish up the job. If bush is there just for something else like to make a profit? Who knows, but if they leave all they would be doing is making matters worse for the country, and for themselves. I mean, if a army came to our country. Got rid of our government and our police, and army collapsed due to lack of funding and miss-organization. Everything around you turned into complete chaos, afterwards they came back to liberate you again and ended up leaving and making matters worse the second time? Wouldn't you be pissed off?

If we stick with it, no matter what the cost is. We can atleast setup the Afghanistan Government, Train there Army and Police. So they can police there own country before we leave. That way we can atleast accomplish something before we leave instead of making things worse. Our deadline to leave should be when the Afghan Army, and Police can handle things on there own. That should be our deadline, not a date.


Last edited by Bacardi4206 on Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2491
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:48 pm
 


I can't see it happening myself as no-one wants to be the first to pull out. The Dutch were talking of pulling out but backed down as they didn't want to suffer the embarrasment of being the first.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35279
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:54 pm
 


Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
Our deadline to leave should be when the Afghan Army, and Police can handle things on there own. That should be our deadline, not a date.


What if we arm and train these guys on our dime just to have them fight us at night with the Taliban, what then?


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4117
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:06 pm
 


LOL @ Scape


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35279
Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2879
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:30 pm
 


philowl philowl:
Harper sent those troops into battle ill-equiped, to be picked off like flies. These guys should be here in Canada being heroes in disasters like the Ice Storm. Afghanistan is a military dead-end.



harper didn't send them there to begin with , he wasn't even prime minister back then . and the miltary still can help out in natural disasters when needed , but its a miltary not a municpal works crew .


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4117
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 5:21 pm
 


Yeah and Canadians soldiers were killed in friendly fire by American troops as well. Whats your point? There also will be corrupt Army members and police officers of course, just like there are corrupt police officers here and in America, and corrupt soldiers in America.

Everybody suffers from a form of corruption, that's no big secret. The Afghan Army and Police have some corrupt loyalists to the terrorist organizations. But most of them have been weeded out, others are hard to spot so I know theres still a few left. Once they do anything that will blow there cover, then there fucked. Building a country, and building a stable Army, and Police force doesn't happen over night. It takes a long time to accomplish, expecially when there is a bunch of terrorists running around destroying what you are trying to accomplish.

What would you rather happen Scape? Would you rather ditch Afghanistan, let the terrorists win? Let them re-take controll of afghanistan where they can re-open training camps, torture innoncent civilians, then eventually carry out more terrorist attacks on western nations? Have innoncent lives, and Afghanistan suffer all because we diddn't want to carry this out? or would you rather stay and accomplish what we went there for with a slim chance of what we built coming back to fight us.

Look at other arab nations who have a police force, and a steady army. Do you see them coming after western nations? Nope, they trade with us. Mostly oil while they sit there in there countries with a law system, not a very good one IMO but a law system non the less.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 35279
PostPosted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:33 pm
 


Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
Yeah and Canadians soldiers were killed in friendly fire by American troops as well. Whats your point?


A blue on blue incident is an accident and not systematic. Americans troops are not trained to intentionally kill allies. This is not a valid point.

Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
There also will be corrupt Army members and police officers of course, just like there are corrupt police officers here and in America, and corrupt soldiers in America.


True, you must note the scale of said corruption in a war torn country that has had the stuffing knocked out of the infrastructure for decades on end with the only form of stability provided by religious zealots with their idea of a greater good is to commit suicide for 72 virgins is not the same as a NYPD beat cop on the take by a local dealer. It's just not the same thing. Our officers work with the ANA and ANP directly and have at times had to tell whole divisions they would be SHOT if they were to loot while under the over watch of our forces as such actions directly undermine the hearts and minds mission we are trying to win. These are the same people that are to be the police when we leave that are little more than a loose rabble of highwaymen extracting bribes like thugs from the civilians at gunpoint. No wonder the locals don't trust us when we give their actions a pass willingly or not. This is why Taliban are such a threat as this is a gang war and fought as such.

Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
The Afghan Army and Police have some corrupt loyalists to the terrorist organizations. But most of them have been weeded out, others are hard to spot so I know theres still a few left. Once they do anything that will blow there cover, then there fucked.


Your appraisal of the situation is optimistic but unrealistic. To give you an idea of the size and scope of the problem listen to this.

Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
Building a country, and building a stable Army, and Police force doesn't happen over night. It takes a long time to accomplish, expecially when there is a bunch of terrorists running around destroying what you are trying to accomplish.
Quite true and the ultimate goal, though laudable, can not be done if the people of the land have no faith in the mission or are too scared to venture beyond the horizon of their own hamlet. The countries of Germany and Japan were all but smashed flat and even nuked but were able to rebuild even while being the front line of the cold war. Even divided in four segments Germany was able to join NATO as a full member only 10 years after the war and Japan was able to join the UN the following year. Do you see the rabble of opium growing warlords that run Afghanistan now doing the same in 50 years? We can build all the roads we want if they are only going to plant them with IED's when our back is turned our good works become Sisyphean rather than a Herculean task.


Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
What would you rather happen Scape? Would you rather ditch Afghanistan, let the terrorists win?


Does the ends justify the means and can the ends be tainted via the degradation of the means? We have lost our share of good troops and will lose more no matter where we go even at home but to every noble effort and selfless sacrifice made does not mean we are cemented to the Afghani fate. Like a gambler chasing his losses he thinks he has a plan but ultimatly he is thinking with his heart and not his head. We need to set goals and objectives but we must also make sure that the Afghanistan we are creating isn't a monster. We must also be sure that the Allies we are standing with can be trusted to be there and not safe in their caveats and garrisons while we do the heavy lifting.


Bacardi4206 Bacardi4206:
Let them re-take controll of afghanistan where they can re-open training camps, torture innoncent civilians, then eventually carry out more terrorist attacks on western nations? Have innoncent lives, and Afghanistan suffer all because we diddn't want to carry this out? or would you rather stay and accomplish what we went there for with a slim chance of what we built coming back to fight us.
The current regime in power is already doing this. Our presence there is validating their barbarisms. Karzi has his hands full but that doesn't mean he is helpless. There are ANA troops that DO want to do right but are surrounded in a culture of corruption and must follow suit just to survive. It is so overwhelming that to even get basic civic permits requires multiple bribes to multiple officials. When corrupting is so vast as to be matter of course and a routine daily event then there is no hope of change from within. It requires a much stronger and direct mandate or none at all as the current one falls far short of tackling the problem. Fighting the enemy and fighting the corruption are equal demands and require equal attention as both ultimately breed the same poisons.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  1  2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.