bootlegga bootlegga:
Still, I do tend to agree that tax cuts for the wealthy and cheap beer are no replacement for good healthcare, education or adequately maintained roads.
Sometimes you cut taxes on the wealthy so you don't lose them altogether.
In California we've so heavily weighted our tax system against the wealthy that according to one of our state agencies (it's quasi-confidential and unpublished for now) so far this year California has lost 138 wealthy people.
That's doesn't sound like a big deal in a state with ~40 million residents, does it?
Yet according to this state agency those 138 people took fifteen percent of the state's personal income tax revenue with them and the state budget that just went into effect on July 1st will now be out of balance by as much as twelve billion dollars.
So once again we'll be looking at a mid-year budget renegotiation come December 31.
But yeah, let's fuck the rich because, well
fuck the rich! Oh, but now WTF do we do with all of the programs that depend on the rich people?
![huh? [huh]](./images/smilies/icon_scratch.gif)
Seriously, you can't just willy-nilly fuck over the most very mobile segment of your population and expect them to pay through the nose for the privilege of being hated and raped by your political class.
These people can move to another state or country with relative ease. The proper balance of taxes is then not so much that it becomes sensible for these people to flee.