CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:49 am
 


Title: Ontario not making plans to replace nuclear power
Category: Misc CDN
Posted By: stemmer
Date: 2011-03-15 08:23:15
Canadian


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
 Detroit Red Wings


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 284
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:49 am
 


Yay! A government with balls! Finally someone who will think long term instead of by the minute like the media conditions most of these half wits.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 50938
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:52 am
 


I remember something about nuclear powerplants being shut down and cancer patients without a treatment...


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4765
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:00 am
 


Nuclear power is like a good dog, if you feed him, give comfortable conditions and take care - he's your friend. But if not, you can be bitten.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53116
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:29 am
 


Brenda Brenda:
I remember something about nuclear powerplants being shut down and cancer patients without a treatment...


Different kind of nuclear plant. It generates power as a byproduct of producing medical isotopes. Medical Isotopes being it's primary function.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:21 am
 


I'm within a few miles of 2 separate facilities..wheeeee XD


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 Los Angeles Kings
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4661
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:57 am
 


I'm guessing the Ontario plants are NOT in danger of being flooded by a tsunami. There is no reason for Ontario to replace them.

EDIT: Added the NOT. My copy editor is earning his keep today.


Last edited by DanSC on Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 14139
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:02 pm
 


DanSC DanSC:
I'm guessing the Ontario plants are in danger of being flooded by a tsunami. There is no reason for Ontario to replace them.

I was actually having fun with it. The fact I essentially live between 2 separate facilities really doesn't give me much pause.
However, replacing old technology wouldn't exactly be a stupid idea.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
 Toronto Maple Leafs
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2398
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:06 pm
 


$1:
On Tuesday, New Democrat Environmental critic Peter Tabuns called for the Ontario government to halt construction on the facility amid safety concerns and cost increases.


Sure, we can just build a conventional one and fuel it with NDP bullshit. We could fuel it for centuries.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 53116
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:25 pm
 


QBall QBall:
$1:
On Tuesday, New Democrat Environmental critic Peter Tabuns called for the Ontario government to halt construction on the facility amid safety concerns and cost increases.


Sure, we can just build a conventional one and fuel it with NDP bullshit. We could fuel it for centuries.


And rainbows. Don't forget the rainbows.


Offline
Active Member
Active Member
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 390
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:12 pm
 


More people have died while falling into the Niagara River gorge while visiting the falls than in any North American nuclear accident.

The Pickering nuclear plant is shutting down in 2020 no matter what. That is in 9 years. It takes 10 years to build a replacement.

The cost of nuclear electricity is about 2/5ths to 3/5ths that of the subsidized alternatives of wind and solar. Nuclear power is on demand. The alternatives are not.

Ontario is doomed to be only thinking of Richard Florida's concept of the knowledge economy as it will never appear whilst those with low cost power in North America will prosper due to the rapid return of the manufacturing industry from the grips of foreign lands as the cost of transportation of our raw materials grows exponentially in this era of "peak oil".

Fusion power is decades away and there will be a generation or two in Ontario living in a potentially prosperous land with little to do thanks to the myopic thinking by policy makers and an overabundance of those related to Chicken Little.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:25 pm
 


What an utter crock of shit, but this is typical of the NDP. Japan was hit by the 4th largest quake in recorded history and then a huge tsunami swamped the area. None of these are probable in Ontario. Nuclear energy is the cleanest, most cost effective form of energy possible that causes the least impact on the environment(hydro causes more damage by damming rivers and flooding land). If the NDP was serious about lowering our carbon footprint( :roll: )
they'd be pushing for more reactors.


Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
Profile
Posts: 45
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:30 pm
 


Quake shakes Quebec, Ontario 5.0-magnitude tremor damages Quebec town.
Last Updated: Wednesday, June 23, 2010

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/s ... quake.html

Earthquakes in Ontario rare but not unexpected.
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article ... unexpected


Durham nuclear plants built to withstand earthquakes, experts say.

Mar 15, 2011 - 02:01 PM

Reka Szekely

DURHAM -- As Japan scrambles to deal with a massive nuclear emergency in the wake of a powerful earthquake and tsunami, the question being asked is, could it happen in Durham?

There are two facets to the question: one, whether a similar earthquake could occur in Ontario and the other, whether local nuclear plants can withstand earthquakes.

Ontario Power Generation's Glenn Jager, vice-president of Pickering "A", explains there are many features in the Pickering plant's design that allows it stand up to earthquakes.

"Basically from the foundation on up, it's designed to withstand the seismic loading you would get in this area," he said.

http://www.newsdurhamregion.com/news/article/173473


Think Its time to make New Inuit friends on Facebook just in case :lol:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 42160
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:21 pm
 


You do understand the difference in magnitude between a 5.0(so extremely rare in Canada as to be a non issue) and a 9.0, don't you? The reactors were designed to withstand a 7 and they held out to 9. It was the tsunami, something neither Quebec or Ontario plants have to worry about, that knocked out the generators that should have kept the pumps working.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11813
PostPosted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:32 pm
 


We have an unused hollowed-out mountain in northern BC. Earthquakes, tsunamis, whatever.
Even owned by an Aluminum company that seems more intent on power sales than making aluminum.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  1  2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.