[Newsbot]

Title: Only 29% of Ontarians think Kathleen Wynne is doing a good job: Poll
Category: Provincial Politics
Posted By: N_Fiddledog
Date: 2016-02-22 13:11:30
Canadian

[N_Fiddledog]

I like Canada's best blogger's headline to this one.

29% Of Ontario Residents Certifiably Insane

[2Cdo]

Still 30% fucking morons in Ontario.

[PluggyRug]

The Canadian Gardening magazine suggests putting up a bat house to encourage the presence of these shy animals in your garden.

Bats can consume 3,000 or more mosquitoes and other insects nightly, and bats are much less likely to be rabid than dogs are.

Bats are also responsible for up to 95 percent of seed dispersal essential to the regeneration of forests. Our planet is populated with plenty of bizarre and astonishing bats.

Here are three to watch for...


Sucker Foot Bat

2:

sucker.jpg [ 13.93 KiB | Viewed 651 times ]

Red Wing Bat

1:

red wing.jpg [ 15.52 KiB | Viewed 650 times ]

Ding Bat

0:

Dingbat.jpg [ 12.2 KiB | Viewed 646 times ]

If we could just train her to eat mosquitoes...or do SOMETHING useful!

[ShepherdsDog]

Her only comfort could be, at least she isn't Greg Selinger....not that it's any consolation.

[Lemmy]

$1:

“I find her numbers the most interesting — she has the highest plus-minus number — surprising in that she really hasn’t done much,” Maggi said. “It doesn’t seem to make sense but maybe doing nothing, you’re not alienating any voters ... and perhaps ‘silence is golden’ is appropriate for this particular scenario.”

It makes sense if those who disapprove of her disapprove of her for things other than the job she's doing.

[Thanos]

BRAWNDO - The thirst annihilator. It's got electrolytes! Proudly sponsoring tonight's episode of OW! My Balls!

[OnTheIce]

You can always count on Lemmy to jump in and deflect away from his pal Kathleen.

[Lemmy]

Again, you mistake objectivity for support. You get a notion in your skull and just hang with it. Pretty sure I'm on the record supporting Hudak, aren't I? Said many times that civil service needs trimmed. 100,000 was sound policy. Shitting politicking, but sound policy. Pretty sure I ripped on Wynne for selling Hydro one, didn't I? What else has she done to have her numbers go from "majority" election win to this?

[BeaverFever]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Still 30% fucking morons in Ontario.

Where'd you get the extra 1% from? Did you add in the people who voted Conservative in the last election?

[PublicAnimalNo9]

BeaverFever BeaverFever:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Still 30% fucking morons in Ontario.

Where'd you get the extra 1% from? Did you add in the people who voted Conservative in the last election?

Nah, he just naturally assumed you voted for her twice.

[PublicAnimalNo9]

Lemmy Lemmy:

$1:

“I find her numbers the most interesting — she has the highest plus-minus number — surprising in that she really hasn’t done much,” Maggi said. “It doesn’t seem to make sense but maybe doing nothing, you’re not alienating any voters ... and perhaps ‘silence is golden’ is appropriate for this particular scenario.”

It makes sense if those who disapprove of her disapprove of her for things other than the job she's doing.

Like what?

[OnTheIce]

Lemmy Lemmy:

Again, you mistake objectivity for support. You get a notion in your skull and just hang with it. Pretty sure I'm on the record supporting Hudak, aren't I? Said many times that civil service needs trimmed. 100,000 was sound policy. Shitting politicking, but sound policy. Pretty sure I ripped on Wynne for selling Hydro one, didn't I? What else has she done to have her numbers go from "majority" election win to this?

Objectivity?

More like 'Positivity'.

How many times have you come to the defence of our Provincial government with your "its not so bad" mantra?

[Lemmy]

PublicAnimalNo9 PublicAnimalNo9:

Lemmy Lemmy:

It makes sense if those who disapprove of her disapprove of her for things other than the job she's doing.

Like what?

Well if she hasn't done anything, in terms of policy or government action, to have earned such low public opinion, that low public opinion must be the result of something else, mustn't it? If they say "I think she's doing a bad job because she's been in office a year and hasn't done anything yet", fair enough. Is that what they're saying though?

OnTheIce OnTheIce:

How many times have you come to the defence of our Provincial government with your "its not so bad" mantra?

I don't know. That would depend on how many times you and others have exaggerated something out of political spite, instead of sticking to facts. See, that's the mistake you make over and over and over and over again. When I call out someone's exaggerations, that is not defence of anyone. It's defence of fact. It's separating fact from rhetoric. When I call out your anti-Liberal rhetoric, that doesn't imply that I support of the Liberals. Usually I don't support them. What I support are facts and objectivity, which is a world your type isn't familiar with.

[OnTheIce]

Lemmy Lemmy:

I don't know. That would depend on how many times you and others have exaggerated something out of political spite, instead of sticking to facts. See, that's the mistake you make over and over and over and over again. When I call out someone's exaggerations, that is not defence of anyone. It's defence of fact. It's separating fact from rhetoric. When I call out your anti-Liberal rhetoric, that doesn't imply that I support of the Liberals. Usually I don't support them. What I support are facts and objectivity, which is a world your type isn't familiar with.

When you opt to ignore the record of the current Liberals and Kathleen Wynne, as you have done above with your suggestion that they haven't done anything in the last year, and brush off criticism of the government based on facts and not rhetoric, you're either blind to what's taking place or you support the Liberals.

When you ignore the obvious like the sale of Hydro One, the pending ORPP, staggering debt/deficit and the current OPP charges in Sudbury to suggest she's done nothing is just turning a blind eye or ignorance.