OK so this is what's disputed.
Tricks Tricks:
There is evidence to support that he is a very vocal opponent to anything relating to gay people having the same rights and straight people.
As we get into it we discover this
"evidence" stems from Pence's opposition to The Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
The issue concerned "
civil" rights.
Conflict of claims can be seen as one of perception. Pence perceives a possible conflict of civil rights:
$1:
Some examples under ENDA [The Employment Non-Discrimination Act] would mean employees around the country who possess religious beliefs that are opposed to homosexual behavior would be forced, in effect, to lay down their rights and convictions at the door. For example, if an employee keeps a Bible in his or her cubicle, if an employee displays a Bible verse on their desk, that employee could be claimed by a homosexual colleague to be creating a hostile work environment because the homosexual employee objects to passages in the Bible relating to homosexuality.
You may not see that if you are laboring with a nature of Anti-Christian bigotry. You will not see the possible conflict between the civil rights of Christians and the civil rights of homosexuals there. Perhaps you don't think Christians have civil rights.
What about the one previously mentioned then?
"The casting directors for the hit Broadway play Hamilton put out an ad specifically seeking “non-white” actors." Is it possible Whites might "perceive" a conflict of civil rights there?
Could Pence have a point? Could perceptions of human rights conflict between groups?
Therefore I suggest there is no conflict between Pence's claim, "
“I don’t condone discrimination against people for any reason whatsoever." and his opposition to ENDA.
The "evidence" for a claim of Pence's supposed rejection of human rights civil or other is not there. Perception of possible conflict of rights between groups is not rejection of either side's civil rights.