[Gunnair]

Curtman Curtman:

We don't disrupt surgery. That makes us better than you.

I disrupted surgery? News to me.

Does that mean you beat up home owners?

[2Cdo]

Gunnair Gunnair:

Does that mean you beat up home owners?

I doubt very much if little ol' Curt will reply to this one.

Thanks for the morning laugh.

[fifeboy]

Curtman Curtman:

Do you think Maurice Vellacott has been elected by his constituents to question the judgement and ethics of medical professionals, and demand the RCMP take action based on his beliefs?

Actually, he was. During the last two elections Maurie said nothing but:" Me with Stevo, Stevo good! Me want to protect sacred zygotes, zygotes good. Abortion bad."

[Curtman]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Gunnair Gunnair:

Does that mean you beat up home owners?

I doubt very much if little ol' Curt will reply to this one.

Thanks for the morning laugh.

Why bother. You two make a good pair. You're not quite at the level of being able to run out a topic for several pages without saying anything at all



You know what they say, practice makes perfect Chester.

[Gunnair]

You do blanch easy, Curt. Must be rough to shy off so quickly to the tough discussions.

[Curtman]

Gunnair Gunnair:

You do blanch easy, Curt. Must be rough to shy off so quickly to the tough discussions.

Say something about the topic and it'll be a discussion. What you do on this forum isn't that. It's just mindless auto-bot page after page. You're a waste of electrons.

[Gunnair]

Curtman Curtman:

Gunnair Gunnair:

You do blanch easy, Curt. Must be rough to shy off so quickly to the tough discussions.

Say something about the topic and it'll be a discussion. What you do on this forum isn't that. It's just mindless auto-bot page after page. You're a waste of electrons.

Auto bot? From the pot good harper bad guy?

Now that is funny.

[2Cdo]

Curtman Curtman:

Why bother. You two make a good pair. You're not quite at the level of being able to run out a topic for several pages without saying anything at all

Whether I agree with the medals given or not, are they not constituents of his?

I don't agree with their tactics either, but, the fact that you don't agree with them while giving a pass to disruptive behaviour of causes you support reeks of hypocrosy.

Plus we can sum up all your posts as "Harper bad".

[2Cdo]

I also note you're quick to accuse anyone supporting others that call you on your hypocrosy as cheerleaders and such. Too bad Curt, you do show some potential but your blinders and rabid partisanship destroys any credibility you might have.

[andyt]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Plus we can sum up all your posts as "Harper bad".

Oh oh, turn down the reverb, Gunnair.

[Curtman]

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Whether I agree with the medals given or not, are they not constituents of his?

The medal recipients? No.

2Cdo 2Cdo:

I don't agree with their tactics either, but, the fact that you don't agree with them while giving a pass to disruptive behaviour of causes you support reeks of hypocrosy.

It doesn't matter if you or I agree with their tactics. As I said, if Jacob Hunter was to receive a medal for his protests I would think it was very strange. For this MP to do that, announce that they are righteous as MLK, and order the RCMP to arrest people based on nothing more than a stats can report is very strange. What I find fascinating in this forum are the people like yourself who jump to the rescue in defense of the party image on an issue like this and at the same time make accusations about my partisanship all the while.

That is hypocrisy.

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Plus we can sum up all your posts as "Harper bad".

Do what you like. Try to not let it interfere with the discussion please.

[2Cdo]

andyt andyt:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Plus we can sum up all your posts as "Harper bad".

Oh oh, turn down the reverb, Gunnair.

Oh look Curts little cheerleader showed up. BTW andy I've been using the "Harper bad" for Curts post for quite some time but you figured you'd jump right in in order to get a little dig in.

As Sandorski says, Fail.

Oops. obviously I'm a cheerleader for Sandorski now.

Two peas in a pod, Curt and andy.

[Gunnair]

andyt andyt:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Plus we can sum up all your posts as "Harper bad".

Oh oh, turn down the reverb, Gunnair.

I only control my own conversations...

[Gunnair]

Curtman Curtman:

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Whether I agree with the medals given or not, are they not constituents of his?

The medal recipients? No.

2Cdo 2Cdo:

I don't agree with their tactics either, but, the fact that you don't agree with them while giving a pass to disruptive behaviour of causes you support reeks of hypocrosy.

It doesn't matter if you or I agree with their tactics. As I said, if Jacob Hunter was to receive a medal for his protests I would think it was very strange. For this MP to do that, announce that they are righteous as MLK, and order the RCMP to arrest people based on nothing more than a stats can report is very strange. What I find fascinating in this forum are the people like yourself who jump to the rescue in defense of the party image on an issue like this and at the same time make accusations about my partisanship all the while.

That is hypocrisy.

2Cdo 2Cdo:

Plus we can sum up all your posts as "Harper bad".

Do what you like. Try to not let it interfere with the discussion please.

Your post here can be easily condensed into nothing more than a fit of pique over someone being rewarded for their disruptive tactics that they used to advance their agenda. The problem develops when it's you doing the complaining here because all of the causes you throw your weight behind are equally disruptive but they get a by because you happen to support that particular cause celebre.

[Curtman]

Which causes do I throw my weight behind? One: Ending the violence, corruption, and addictions caused by the war on drugs. I'm not aware of any disruptive tactics by anyone on my side of the debate, let alone having supported one thats on the level of barging into a hospital to disrupt surgery and threatening someone's life in the guise of "saving" another.

You excuse this behaviour and complain about peaceful non-violent protest supported by myself.

Just a simple, 'this MP is an ass for doing those things' would suffice. But the two of you would rather pretend any and all protest is acceptable on your side (whatever that is).

So Mr. Useless Machine, please explain what "equally disruptive" means with respect to protesters barging into hospitals to disrupt surgery.