[Gunnair]

Curtman Curtman:

Which causes do I throw my weight behind? One: Ending the violence, corruption, and addictions caused by the war on drugs. I'm not aware of any disruptive tactics by anyone on my side of the debate, let alone having supported one thats on the level of barging into a hospital to disrupt surgery and threatening someone's life in the guise of "saving" another.

You excuse this behaviour and complain about peaceful non-violent protest supported by myself.

Just a simple, 'this MP is an ass for doing those things' would suffice. But the two of you would rather pretend any and all protest is acceptable on your side (whatever that is).

So Mr. Useless Machine, please explain what "equally disruptive" means with respect to protesters barging into hospitals to disrupt surgery.

There isn't a thing I could post frankly that would pierce that thoroughly partisan outlook of yours.

All you can do is come here and peddle the normal sordid pile of lies that has become your routine.

[Curtman]

Refuses to answer again, provides another attack. Standard faire I suppose.

[Gunnair]

Curtman Curtman:

Refuses to answer again, provides another attack. Standard faire I suppose.

Refuse to answer what, Curt? The lies you posted that I support anything you accuse me of?

Curtman Curtman:

You are apologizing for this MP, or the protesters? Or just picking fights?

Curtman Curtman:

You are either apologizing for him, or condoning Maurice Vellacott.

Curtman Curtman:

We don't disrupt surgery. That makes us better than you.

All of these accusations are based on lies and have devolved into the personal for absolutely no reason, Curt. Makes me think that the drama stories you are relating here regarding your own personal circumstance might just equally be yet another thread of lies you are using to bolster today's argument of the day since you seem to have no issue throwing out unwarranted accusations and outright lies into the ether here to try and score some points.

If you wish to continue a discourse here, you can begin be settling down into a mature dialogue.

Or don't and be judged by the timbre and lies you bring both with your personal circumstances and your opinions.

[Curtman]

Again... please explain what "equally disruptive" means with respect to protesters barging into hospitals to disrupt surgery.

What cause do I support that is equally disruptive?

And id like to add: Where has your moral superiority gone?

[Gunnair]

Curtman Curtman:

Again... please explain what "equally disruptive" means with respect to protesters barging into hospitals to disrupt surgery.

What cause do I support that is equally disruptive?

And id like to add: Where has your moral superiority gone?

You've been a vocal proponent of Idle No More - a very disruptive and racist organization.

As for my moral superiority, it's alive and well, friend.

[bootlegga]

Lemmy Lemmy:

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

Just embracing the argument is all.

All too many abortion supporters get all offended when the suggestion is made that maybe they should have been aborted.

Your fallacy lies in your presumption that "pro choice" means "abortion supporter". That's not the case. I'm not pro-abortion. I detest the notion of abortion. I also detest obesity and cigarette smoking, but it's not my place to tell other people what to do with their bodies...and it's SURE AS HELL not the government's place to do so.

What I am is a realist. Prohibiting abortion doesn't prohibit abortion. All it does is drive it underground, just like prohibiting alcohol didn't stop people from drinking; it just meant more people drank unsafe/poisonous illegal liquor. We know what happens when abortion is made illegal: young girls go to back-alley quacks with coat-hangers.

BartSimpson BartSimpson:

What if your mother had thought about an abortion when she was pregnant with you? Aren't you glad that she didn't do it?

So why should you get a chance at life when some other unborn baby with every bit the same amount of potential in life as yourself ends up in a vacuum bottle?

You're right, lost life is a tragedy. Metaphysically speaking, I'd be pissed if I'd been aborted. But that choice is a family choice, a parent's (or parents') choice, not yours and not government's. And if the day comes when my daughter has to weigh that decision, I'll do whatever I can to convince her to have the child, but that choice will be made by her, not me, not you, and not the government. And if her mother and I aren't around or she chooses to make that decision without us, I sure as hell hope that SAFE abortion clinics are an option for her. I'm not much for prayer, but I pray that backward thinking, high-minded zealots like yourself never succeed in forcing teenage girls back into back-alley abortions.

+5