CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Vancouver Canucks
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 30650
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:42 pm
 


Title: Harper deals with new Arctic rival: China
Category: World
Posted By: Hyack
Date: 2010-06-23 16:36:29
Canadian


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 Ottawa Senators


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 17037
PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:42 pm
 


China can go fuck the 18 generations of its ancestors.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 5:24 am
 


$1:
China is playing for keeps when it comes to vast natural resources that lie under the Arctic Ocean. A top Chinese admiral said earlier this year that, by his reasoning, because one-fifth of the world’s population lives in China, China was entitled to one-fifth of the resources that lie in the Arctic’s international waters.

"The Arctic belongs to all the people around the world as no nation has sovereignty over it," Rear Admiral Yin Zhuo said in the spring. "China must play an indispensable role in Arctic exploration as we have one-fifth of the world's population.”


China is going to be mighty disappointed.

They have no business in the Arctic.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:26 am
 


saturn_656 saturn_656:
$1:
China is playing for keeps when it comes to vast natural resources that lie under the Arctic Ocean. A top Chinese admiral said earlier this year that, by his reasoning, because one-fifth of the world’s population lives in China, China was entitled to one-fifth of the resources that lie in the Arctic’s international waters.

"The Arctic belongs to all the people around the world as no nation has sovereignty over it," Rear Admiral Yin Zhuo said in the spring. "China must play an indispensable role in Arctic exploration as we have one-fifth of the world's population.”


China is going to be mighty disappointed.

They have no business in the Arctic.


And Canada has f*** all to stop them.

For the record, people; I told you so. :idea:


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:17 pm
 


China's argument is similar to the French argument that they have a stake in the Arctic mineral right. Really? Can We can go into China and mine their resources and they won't mind? Not Really.

The are so full of it. They must be smoking the same shit Kim Jong Ill has been smoking.

China (as was said earlier) can screw its ancient ancestors.

It may come to Peace Through Superior Firepower.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 23084
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:20 pm
 


GreenTiger GreenTiger:
It may come to Peace Through Superior Firepower.


Unfortunately, they have the superior firepower...


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:27 pm
 


bootlegga bootlegga:
GreenTiger GreenTiger:
It may come to Peace Through Superior Firepower.


Unfortunately, they have the superior firepower...


Time we got it.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 816
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:31 pm
 


So geography should dictate who has ownership of the arctic? Actualy, I feel it more fair that China does get 1/5 of the arctic because of their size. Stop being territorial and good things will come.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
 New York Rangers
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 11240
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:34 pm
 


Stellar Stellar:
So geography should dictate who has ownership of the arctic? Actualy, I feel it more fair that China does get 1/5 of the arctic because of their size. Stop being territorial and good things will come.


Let the Chinese argue to the Russians that 1/5 of what they own should Really go to China. Lets see how far they get.

I wonder what is Cyrillic for Fuck off.


Last edited by GreenTiger on Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Vancouver Canucks


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 65472
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:36 pm
 


Stellar Stellar:
Stop being territorial and...


...you'll soon have no territory to worry about. :idea:


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:36 pm
 


Stellar Stellar:
So geography should dictate who has ownership of the arctic? Actualy, I feel it more fair that China does get 1/5 of the arctic because of their size. Stop being territorial and good things will come.


Arguing that China should get 1/5th of the Arctic based on population alone? So I guess India should get another 1/5th right?

Do you realize that if you follow this to its logical conclusion, Canada with a population of only 34 million or so will end up with nothing?


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 816
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:44 pm
 


Yep, fair enough to me.

I have no desire to fight for some elite interests, so let it go to more under-privledged nations with a greater need for it.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:47 pm
 


Stellar Stellar:
Yep, fair enough to me.

I have no desire to fight for some elite interests, so let it go to more under-privledged nations with a greater need for it.


Let larger countries pillage our resources because they're bigger and so called "under privlidged"?

Words cannot express how happy I am that you (or someone holding the same opinion) are not running the show.

If that were the case, we'd have no country left.


Offline
CKA Moderator
CKA Moderator
 Toronto Maple Leafs


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 816
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:53 pm
 


Our resources? It was nomans land until the oil question came up.

I'm not trying to give out Canada to the point of no sovereignty, but if you do follow my reasoning, for the greater good for the "world", why should 32 million calim ownership of 30% of the wealth?

National-self interest is a primitive, tribal idea; somthing that mankind would be better off moving past.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Ottawa Senators
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7684
PostPosted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:57 pm
 


Stellar Stellar:
Our resources? It was nomans land until the oil question came up.


Canada has claimed its chunk of the Arctic since the 1920's.

Our territory is not "no man's land".

Image

$1:
I'm not trying to give out Canada to the point of no sovereignty, but if you do follow my reasoning, for the greater good for the "world", why should 32 million calim ownership of 30% of the wealth?


Because its territory we claim to be ours? If China wants it, they should expect to pay top dollar or fight for it.

$1:
National-self interest is a primitive, tribal idea; somthing that mankind would be better off moving past.


That's not the world we live in.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests



cron
 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.