CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 St. Louis Blues
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3915
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:05 am
 


GM's problems were not a lack of sales or poor quality... It was more due to the fact imports have an higher profit margin on their cars.... This can be attributed to the Big Three having an higher hourly wage and legacy costs of retirement pensions & healthcare benefits...

As many have already pointed out here GM's sales are #2 in the world only being slightly surpassed by Toyota in 2008... Prior to 2008 GM was the number one auto seller on the globe...


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:51 am
 


stemmer stemmer:
As many have already pointed out here GM's sales are #2 in the world only being slightly surpassed by Toyota in 2008... Prior to 2008 GM was the number one auto seller on the globe...



"Cheap" poorly built vehicles sold in high volumes still puts GM where they are today. Being number one prior to 2008 and being bankrupt in 2009 has to give you a hint that something has been wrong for a very long time.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
 St. Louis Blues
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 3915
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:50 am
 


Again...the profit margin on domestic autos is a lot less then that on imports... Now please repeat this simple accounting principle until you clue in....


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:57 am
 


It wont surprise me if GM is still number 1 in truck sales for the next few years.

Do you guys remember what happened when the prices for CDRW drives got dropped to make way for new dvd technology? We bought into it so hard and heavy, it breathed life back into the market for many years.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:58 am
 


stemmer stemmer:
Again...the profit margin on domestic autos is a lot less then that on imports... Now please repeat this simple accounting principle until you clue in....


Please cite your source. I think it's bullshit.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
Profile
Posts: 4183
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:58 am
 


Same thing happened with sales for alberta beef. I filled my freezer, how about you?


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7594
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:55 pm
 


stemmer stemmer:
GM's problems were not a lack of sales or poor quality... It was more due to the fact imports have an higher profit margin on their cars.... This can be attributed to the Big Three having an higher hourly wage and legacy costs of retirement pensions & healthcare benefits...

As many have already pointed out here GM's sales are #2 in the world only being slightly surpassed by Toyota in 2008... Prior to 2008 GM was the number one auto seller on the globe...


As per usual you're flat-ass wrong! Today's Globe and Mail business section + National Post + Fritz Henderson ALL attributed GM's woes to a lack of consumer confidence in the product. One of those contributing factors was POOR QUALITY. But hey, they're ALL wrong and you and Canadian Tire crew are right. Riiiiiight.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 7594
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:55 pm
 


poquas poquas:
stemmer stemmer:
Again...the profit margin on domestic autos is a lot less then that on imports... Now please repeat this simple accounting principle until you clue in....


Please cite your source. I think it's bullshit.


Actually, i'm interested in seeing this too.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:05 pm
 


Robair Robair:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
I don't want to see people out of work for GM's mistakes, but they are, in fact GM's mistakes, and now it's come back to bite them in the bankrupted ass.

No, actually, it's biting me in the ass. You too.

Any tax payer should be pissed about this. Unless they work at GM...


We'd be paying for them regardless either through EI and other assistance programs. Isn't it better to pay less and save an industry at the same time?


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 2245
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:21 pm
 


What we'd pay through social support would have been a fraction of what this has cost. Much like Fiat picking up Chrysler, someone would have picked up the pieces of GM twenty billion dollars ago.

Frankly, I'm not convinced the "new GM" has anything more to offer than the "old GM".


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:28 pm
 


poquas poquas:
What we'd pay through social support would have been a fraction of what this has cost. Much like Fiat picking up Chrysler, someone would have picked up the pieces of GM twenty billion dollars ago.

Frankly, I'm not convinced the "new GM" has anything more to offer than the "old GM".


Mostly your opinion, mind you.....that's ok though :D


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 8157
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:36 pm
 


OnTheIce OnTheIce:
Robair Robair:
Mustang1 Mustang1:
I don't want to see people out of work for GM's mistakes, but they are, in fact GM's mistakes, and now it's come back to bite them in the bankrupted ass.

No, actually, it's biting me in the ass. You too.

Any tax payer should be pissed about this. Unless they work at GM...


We'd be paying for them regardless either through EI and other assistance programs. Isn't it better to pay less and save an industry at the same time?

Huh? Either way that equates to a bite out of the taxpayers ass due to GM's mistakes... ...so I shouldn't be pissed at GM because...?

*shrug* maybe I'm missunderstanding your post, maybe you missread mine.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
Profile
Posts: 10666
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:52 pm
 


Robair Robair:

Huh? Either way that equates to a bite out of the taxpayers ass due to GM's mistakes... ...so I shouldn't be pissed at GM because...?

*shrug* maybe I'm missunderstanding your post, maybe you missread mine.



Course we should be upset....but the ass bite is smaller taking this route than the other.


Offline
CKA Super Elite
CKA Super Elite
 Montreal Canadiens


GROUP_AVATAR
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 6584
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:14 pm
 


OnTheIce OnTheIce:
Robair Robair:

Huh? Either way that equates to a bite out of the taxpayers ass due to GM's mistakes... ...so I shouldn't be pissed at GM because...?

*shrug* maybe I'm missunderstanding your post, maybe you missread mine.



Course we should be upset....but the ass bite is smaller taking this route than the other.


That is only your and the governement's opinion. That doesn't mean it's true. 13B$ was wasted here: there's no return on investment. Wow we own 12.5% of GM but owning an endebted company is not a very good idea IMO.

That's a vote buying scheme to "prove" the government is "in control". But the governement cannot control the economy. It can only take our money and give it to others to buy them.


Offline
CKA Elite
CKA Elite
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 4805
PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:53 pm
 


How many times have we bailed out the auto-industry ? This is like grandpa on life support pull the plug already.

Once they learn to start making cars that people actually want instead making cars they want to sell. They might actually get ahead. Electric Cars, make them. People want them.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 177 posts ]  Previous  1 ... 3  4  5  6  7  8  9 ... 12  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.