llama66 llama66:
Really, there is a law...
It's set out under the Competition Act (Section 75... I think) and the BC Trespass Act (Section 2(1) and 4(2))
Human Rights Tribunals are not under the auspice of the Canadian Justice System... They are created from the Canadian Human Rights Act.
$1:
Human Rights commissions (both provincial and federal) are types of administrative bodies. Administrative bodies are government entities created by statute. They are in charge of implementing government policies. No two administrative bodies are identical. Some tribunals make decisions about rights and adjudicate disputes in a way that resembles a court. Others may be focused on standard setting and bear very little resemblance to a court.
http://www.aclrc.com/appealing-from-tribunal-decisionsThey may make a determination that Yaniv's right to have his scrotum waxed was violated, if they find he has a right to have his scrotum waxed. But what they actually found was Yaniv had no human right to have his balls waxed. And "... human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british- ... -1.5330807But a court cannot rule to violate section 12 of the Constitution - "12. Everyone has the right
not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment."
So even if the HRC did rule Yaniv had a right to a good ball waxing, they could not make anyone wax them. Yaniv is just going to have to pay a prostitute to do it, like the rest of us.