|
Author |
Topic Options
|
Wally_Sconce 
CKA Elite
Posts: 3469
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 3:21 am
Robair Robair: Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck: IMO, the cost of a quality management system suitable for a privatized, legal drug producer will be the equivalent to the 'danger pay' that the drug pushers are charging.
It's not cheap to get into the pharma/medical industry. Good point, but why would it be any more than tobbacco? Buying weed is a hell of a lot more expensive than cancer sticks right now... thats an interesting point, but are you sure that the regulations of marijuana should mirror tobaco? I think that marijuana's phychotropic affect and it's connection to impaired driving, schizophrenia, etc warrants a different approach than tobacco. Additionally, i think it would be a damn crime if someone didn't process the THC into a suppository so a dose of THC can be delivered without the carcinogenic risk of smoking. Such a produce ought to be regulated like an over the counter pharmaceutical, not like tobaco or alcohol, imo.
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 4:51 am
Last edited by Public_Domain on Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 5:09 am
The synthetic THC doesn't seem to work as well as the organic. There is something more than just the THC that seems to make pot work its wonders.
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:09 am
Last edited by Public_Domain on Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Wally_Sconce 
CKA Elite
Posts: 3469
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 6:54 am
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: The synthetic THC doesn't seem to work as well as the organic. There is something more than just the THC that seems to make pot work its wonders. thats obvious. even tobacco is more addictive than the nicotene patch.
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 7:37 am
It isn't about addiction, it's the effect that the two have on people. The synthetic shit gets some people all cranked up and paranoid, while the cannibas plant, ingested or smoked, has a mellowing influence. So there is something else, acting like some sort of catalyst, within the plant. it's not just the THC.
|
Lemmy
CKA Uber
Posts: 12349
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:37 am
j
Last edited by Lemmy on Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
Posts: 3941
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:46 am
Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck: Additionally, i think it would be a damn crime if someone didn't process the THC into a suppository so a dose of THC can be delivered without the carcinogenic risk of smoking. There are much better delivery methods. You can vapourise, you can bake.
|
Posts: 3941
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:48 am
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: It isn't about addiction, it's the effect that the two have on people. The synthetic shit gets some people all cranked up and paranoid, while the cannibas plant, ingested or smoked, has a mellowing influence. So there is something else, acting like some sort of catalyst, within the plant. it's not just the THC. That would be the CBD. In plants that have been bred for high THC content, CBD is practically non-existant. CBD is an anti-psychotic while THC can cause a small number of people to exhibit psychotic behaviour.
|
Posts: 8157
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:45 am
Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck: thats an interesting point, but are you sure that the regulations of marijuana should mirror tobaco? I think that marijuana's phychotropic affect and it's connection to impaired driving, schizophrenia, etc warrants a different approach than tobacco. Alright then, alchohol. Aging_Redneck Aging_Redneck: Additionally, i think it would be a damn crime if someone didn't process the THC into a suppository so a dose of THC can be delivered without the carcinogenic risk of smoking. Such a produce ought to be regulated like an over the counter pharmaceutical, not like tobaco or alcohol, imo. You like suppositorys, we get it already. Like an over the counter pharmaceutical? I don't see why not, though it is a recreational drug like tobbacco or alchohol...
|
BAT119
Active Member
Posts: 267
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 11:51 am
Goverment produced pot would be boring, it would have a regulated amount of THC and come in a plain brown wrapper, its been a long time for me but when you scored it was always differnet stuff, some good, some bad and some was reallllly good! No doubt the crooks would still produce the best product and the illegal industry would still be booming.
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:21 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:09 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
Posts: 8157
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:35 pm
BAT119 BAT119: Goverment produced pot would be boring, it would have a regulated amount of THC and come in a plain brown wrapper, its been a long time for me but when you scored it was always differnet stuff, some good, some bad and some was reallllly good! No doubt the crooks would still produce the best product and the illegal industry would still be booming. Does the government brew your beer or roll your cigs? No? Then why are you thinking they would sell marijuana?? You make it legal and private industry takes over.
|
Posts: 35270
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:43 pm
I can see the current gang members in a future where pot is legal. Working on the farms plowing, planting and picking. Rolling joints and packing. Driving their small vans making deliveries to gas stations and convenience stores. 
|
Posts: 21611
Posted: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:46 pm
Last edited by Public_Domain on Tue Feb 25, 2025 12:10 am, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Page 16 of 19
|
[ 279 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests |
|
|