[Newsbot]

Title: B.C. jail sex incident prompts lawsuit
Category: Law & Order
Posted By: wildrosegirl
Date: 2010-11-16 06:59:09
Canadian

[billypilgrim]

doesn't parting the knees imply consent?

[Brenda]

billypilgrim billypilgrim:

doesn't parting the knees imply consent?

No.

[PostFactum]

The result is one: the security stuff of jail is not working conscientiously.

[Choban]

Such incidents obviously open the door to lawsuits, said Victoria lawyer Erik Magraken

That says it all to me, not to lessen or deny the facts she is claiming but given the coverage this incident received it's entirely possable she is escallating or even fabricating her side of the story to agree with a law suit. Again I'm not saying this is the case just that it's possible.

[raydan]

Brenda Brenda:

billypilgrim billypilgrim:

doesn't parting the knees imply consent?

No.

I beg to differ.

[billypilgrim]

Brenda Brenda:

billypilgrim billypilgrim:

doesn't parting the knees imply consent?

No.

well what do you need, a bloody note from your parents?

[Brenda]

billypilgrim billypilgrim:

Brenda Brenda:

billypilgrim billypilgrim:

doesn't parting the knees imply consent?

No.

well what do you need, a bloody note from your parents?

Excuse me?
She could be running naked in the streets for all I care, that still does not give any one the right to touch her.

[andyt]

Maybe the "victim" was too drunk to consent. But then why couldn't the "agressor" have been to drunk to form intent? Maybe it all evens out.

[raydan]

Brenda Brenda:

Excuse me?
She could be running naked in the streets for all I care, that still does not give any one the right to touch her.

People!!!

I'm pretty sure Billypilgrim is joking on this one.
He just needs to know how to use the smilies.
If he isn't joking, we'll ban his sorry ass in no time.

[andyt]

Actually, a written agreement is always a good idea, so there's no he said she said, or in this case she said she said, stuff afterwards. Preferably notarized, and spelling out in detail each act that will be engaged in, duration, frequency and intensity of each act, and who calls who the next couple of days.

[raydan]

andyt andyt:

Actually, a written agreement is always a good idea, so there's no he said she said, or in this case she said she said, stuff afterwards...

Are you saying that to have sex, you need to marry her first?

[andyt]

raydan raydan:

andyt andyt:

Actually, a written agreement is always a good idea, so there's no he said she said, or in this case she said she said, stuff afterwards...

Are you saying that to have sex, you need to marry her first?

No, you should just get it in writing that she agrees to have sex with you and what specifically you're both agreeing to. Otherwise she can later claim she didn't consent, and they're going to believe her, not you.

[Brenda]

raydan raydan:

Brenda Brenda:

Excuse me?
She could be running naked in the streets for all I care, that still does not give any one the right to touch her.

People!!!

I'm pretty sure Billypilgrim is joking on this one.
He just needs to know how to use the smilies.
If he isn't joking, we'll ban his sorry ass in no time.

Have you seen all his other posts? Either he has a fucked up sense of humour, or he is dead serious.
Both are reasons to be called on his shit

[raydan]

Brenda Brenda:

Have you seen all his other posts? Either he has a fucked up sense of humour, or he is dead serious.
Both are reasons to be called on his shit

A lot of us here have a "fucked up sense of humour".

Maybe he's just off his meds.