Last edited by N_Fiddledog on Thu May 28, 2015 3:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
BeaverFever
CKA Uber
Posts: 15244
Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 3:39 pm
Listen again you idiots, in Europe and elsewhere, these self declared courts already have no standing under the law so you don't need to individually pass laws declaring them to have no standing. No disaster was averted here because what was declared illegitimate and unrecognized by the law was always illegitimate and unrecognized by the law. Only the State has jurisdiction, full stop.
Right now, there's no law that specifically says BeaverFever has no authority to pass his own laws. And yet, if I pasta law right now declaring myself dictator of Canada for life, it would have no effect. So Stephen Harper doesn't have to rush down to Parliament Hill tomorrow to stop me from passing laws. Get it??
This law also doesn't change the fact that people may choose to live under phoney laws from their cult or mosque or whatever. But there's nothing that can be done about that unless a crime is committed
N_Fiddledog
CKA Uber
Posts: 26145
Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 3:41 pm
Be Prepared
Plus...ya know, piss off a Dhimmi. Double-score.
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 4:49 pm
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
Listen again you idiots, in Europe and elsewhere, these self declared courts already have no standing under the law so you don't need to individually pass laws declaring them to have no standing. No disaster was averted here because what was declared illegitimate and unrecognized by the law was always illegitimate and unrecognized by the law. Only the State has jurisdiction, full stop.
Right now, there's no law that specifically says BeaverFever has no authority to pass his own laws. And yet, if I pasta law right now declaring myself dictator of Canada for life, it would have no effect. So Stephen Harper doesn't have to rush down to Parliament Hill tomorrow to stop me from passing laws. Get it??
This law also doesn't change the fact that people may choose to live under phoney laws from their cult or mosque or whatever. But there's nothing that can be done about that unless a crime is committed
Still, the law can't do any harm. Not sure what the concept of foreign laws is - American laws are based on the British legal system, that's foreign.
the law will do nothing. If there is ever support for sharia law in TX, there would also be support for repealing this law.
BeaverFever
CKA Uber
Posts: 15244
Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 5:13 pm
Scaring the public over imaginary threats and whipping up the public over the supposed "enemy in our midst" generally does do harm. It's just another log on the fire.
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 5:22 pm
Compared to what else is out there, including on this forum, that's pretty mild.
I actually like the idea of making clear to religious that they won't get special deals as far as the law is concerned. I just want it applied to all religions. My guess is that with Tex Ass there is all sorts of Christian bullshit they don't even bat an eye at. Wasn't that woman who asked why foreigners couldn't speak English the way Jesus did from Texass?
BeaverFever
CKA Uber
Posts: 15244
Posted: Thu May 28, 2015 5:55 pm
David Koresh and the Branch Davidians were also from Texas. Oddly enough, even though he declared his laws as sovereign, molested and force-married children, stockpiled military grade weapons and opened fire on police officers, there wasn't the same reaction from Texans and Republicans. And when Clinton sent in the ATF and military to raid the place, the republicans howled "remember the tragedy at waco!" for years! Just illustrates the level of cognitive dissonance here.
Basically, don't. (Although yes you can find the odd fringer, or Taqiyya artist claiming it's not a problem)
Here's a couple more examples from sport at to what it actually looks like in a Sharia state. We could consider those as examples of what's actually believed.
It will take a bit to find it, but a week ago or so I watched this video interview with a woman convert who had recently rejected Islam. She was talking about people she knew in - I think it was - Dearborn Michigan who had married under the Sharia, and divorced. She even spoke of Polygamous marriages. They didn't care if the state knew about it.
So is there a section of the Muslim population that would like Sharia? Yes, and it's larger than you think. Are there sections of the Muslim population putting continuous, and varying levels of pressure on the west to bow to Sharia. Yes.
How successful are they? Well...did you hear the one about how "the future must not belong to those who would slander the prophet of Islam?"
(Although, as I already stated, in Texas the current score is Texas 2, Sharia compliance 0. Just ask Pam Geller. )
martin14
CKA Uber
Posts: 33691
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 3:29 am
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
So do we need to worry about Sharia in the West?
That's just sad.
What's even worse is the pathetic limp wristed response from the coach and the idiot at the school board.
BartSimpson
CKA Moderator
Posts: 65472
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 8:12 am
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
So far, it's Texas 2, ISIS no score.
The Fort Hood massacre saw 13 people murdered and at least thirty others injured in the name of that rat bastard maniac from Medina.
ShepherdsDog
CKA Uber
Posts: 42160
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 8:24 am
Killeen and area(including Fort Hood) haven't had a great record when it comes to mass murder....1991, 2009 and 2014.
N_Fiddledog
CKA Uber
Posts: 26145
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 8:28 am
BartSimpson BartSimpson:
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
So far, it's Texas 2, ISIS no score.
The Fort Hood massacre saw 13 people murdered and at least thirty others injured in the name of that rat bastard maniac from Medina.
Damn. Forgot about that. Oh well, remember the Alamo...or something. No, wait...
Zipperfish
CKA Uber
Posts: 21665
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 8:48 am
BeaverFever BeaverFever:
David Koresh and the Branch Davidians were also from Texas. Oddly enough, even though he declared his laws as sovereign, molested and force-married children, stockpiled military grade weapons and opened fire on police officers, there wasn't the same reaction from Texans and Republicans. And when Clinton sent in the ATF and military to raid the place, the republicans howled "remember the tragedy at waco!" for years! Just illustrates the level of cognitive dissonance here.
It was a tragedy. 22 kids killed. And it was the BATF that lit the place up.
N_Fiddledog
CKA Uber
Posts: 26145
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 8:57 am
In any case you'd have to be pretty desperate for a side to your argument to claim there's something analogous between that one and this one.
andyt
CKA Uber
Posts: 33492
Posted: Fri May 29, 2015 9:10 am
N_Fiddledog N_Fiddledog:
In any case you'd have to be pretty desperate for a side to your argument to claim there's something analogous between that one and this one.