[SJ-24]

So Always4Iggy, from what I read, all Conservatives hate fags and dykes? And all Conservatives cut programs to welfare and starve out kids...Good God where do you buy your dope from? May I suggest you stop smoking the Crack and find yourself a good outreach program.....

[Always4Iggy]

Always4iggy Always4iggy:

Like wait times - specific promise, now broken.

Wrong. He has been in for a year.

Tricks Tricks:

If you want to make a tally of broken promises, how about the promises that liberals made every fucking election for 13 years, and still never delivered. That's at least 3 versus harpers 1. AND THEY WERE THE SAME FUCKING PROMISES!

I don't think you get it hwacker. It does not work that way.

Let me give you a simple example. Let us say a son promises his mother that he will mow the lawn. He promises the same thing three days in a row, but does not do it. His mother is disappointed, but she knows her son. He means well and promises sincerely, but he has so many things to worry about, her health, his kids care, you name it.

Then the rich man from next door, who is wooing her, sends his flunkey with a promise - 'Don't depend on your son, I will mow the lawn for you with my thousand dollar automatic mower'

And he fails to do it. NOW the woman is mad! What does the flunkey of the rich bastards mean by playing with her disappointments! Fucking nerve!

So it is like that. Liberals are the sons of the land. Conservatives are the flunkeys of the rich. The c***suckers of millionaires.

When we promise, it is optional. When you promise, you frigging well do it or Canada will fix you in the next election!

[Always4Iggy]

SJ-24 SJ-24:

So Always4Iggy, from what I read, all Conservatives hate fags and dykes?

If you use terms like that, you are suspect, but if you DON'T hate homosexuals, you still have to admit that Stephen Harper's government got where it is mainly due to the support of the haters of homosexuals.

SJ-24 SJ-24:

And all Conservatives cut programs to welfare and starve out kids...

Mother fu**ing sh** ! ! !

Are you denying that? After all the hatred shown here by conservatives for welfare and child food programs? What are you smoking?

SJ-24 SJ-24:

Good God where do you buy your dope from? May I suggest you stop smoking the Crack and find yourself a good outreach program.....

The best outreach program in Canada today is the Liberal Election Platform.

And it will reach most of the conservative voting base!

[hwacker]

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

Conservatives are the flunkeys of the rich. The c***suckers of millionaires.

Na dummie, thats a Liberal. JEEZE. we are the ones against the gays remember ?

Just scroll back a couple pages you brought it up. so quick to forget.

[hwacker]

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

The best outreach program in Canada today is the Liberal Election Platform.

And it will reach most of the conservative voting base!

DuDe put down the crack pipe, your're cooked already.

[Tricks]

Avro Avro:

Why curb greenhouse gases if you don't think global warming exsists?

Because whether or not they are causing global warming, they are going to fuck with the environment eventually.

$1:

Well wait times were and I repeat were a priority for the Tories but nothing has yet been done. I'm not sure why we are not looking at models in Europe which have zero wait times and give access to all it's citizens.

And I completely agree. As much as I hate France, if I am not mistaken, they have one of the best health cares on the planet. Looking to Europe would be very beneficial. But give Harper time. Should he not do it by the next election, then you can bitch

$1:

So somebody is going to watch someones kids, feed them and teach them all day long for hundred bucks a month? Keep Dreaming buddy. The program laid out by the Liberals would have parents pay 35 bucks a week for good quality structured daycare.

No, you missed my point. Teaching them? No one said teach. It is supposed to be used at a fall back. I don't know what the answer is for Daycare. But I don't like institutionalizing kids. That is not the way to go. Again, my mom was working shift work, and was able to take care of my brother and sister, without day care. It can be done. My dad was also working.

$1:

Btw, it's not 100, it's 50 after the Tories tax it.

Hey, if they had their way, there would be no tax.

$1:

I get it now, private school education.

What?

$1:

Private school education at work again.

Oh shut it. It is a message board, if you are really expecting flawless grammar, you are going to be sadly mistaken. And English is my worst subject so a big to you.

$1:

Are you kidding?

A former finance minster didn't know the facts 10 months prior? A former economists didn't know 10 months prior?

I see you conveniently cut the rest of my comment out We don't know what goes on, maybe they did use this to get votes. Hell, I didn't even hear about this promise till it was broken, so it wasn't a big deal to me.

$1:

There was no reallocation, he even said the money he took out would be used somewhere else on the same issue, we just don't know what.

That's reallocating. He moved it to another program. Same issue different program.

$1:

Tell me in your own words with no C&P why the program was wasteful.

Which one? Women's rights one? Gun registry?

$1:

The Libs btw were also putting more money into the military and cutting taxes......don't believe me....look it up.

Oh I know that.....but it took 13 years to do it. They did it when it was needed. We needed money in the military because of afghanistan. If there was no afghanistan conflict, would they have put money in? I sincerely doubt it. They wait until it is absolutely needed.

"Professional armies are deliriously expensive to maintain in peacetime, but they can save your bacon when you need them." -- Michael A. Cessna

"To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace." -- George Washington 1790.

$1:

Hey, if I don't talk to you before, have a great Christmas kid.

You too.

See people, we can have a civilized discussion. Me and Avro (sorry Avro and I ) rarely agree, have we insulted each other? No. Sure, it is fun to poke fun at someone's stupidity (Cagey for instance) but for senior members who are going to be sticking around, is it really necessary?

[Tricks]

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

I don't think you get it hwacker. It does not work that way.

Pay attention now. I am Tricks.

$1:

Let me give you a simple example. Let us say a son promises his mother that he will mow the lawn. He promises the same thing three days in a row, but does not do it. His mother is disappointed, but she knows her son. He means well and promises sincerely, but he has so many things to worry about, her health, his kids care, you name it.

Doesn't matter. Don't make a promise you know you can't keep. The more you do it, the worse it looks.

$1:

Then the rich man from next door, who is wooing her, sends his flunkey with a promise - 'Don't depend on your son, I will mow the lawn for you with my thousand dollar automatic mower'

And he fails to do it. NOW the woman is mad! What does the flunkey of the rich bastards mean by playing with her disappointments! Fucking nerve!

Suddenly she is more pissed off at the rich guy? What if he had things to worry about? Douche.

$1:

So it is like that. Liberals are the sons of the land. Conservatives are the flunkeys of the rich. The c***suckers of millionaires.

Really? So what are millionaires?

$1:

When we promise, it is optional. When you promise, you frigging well do it or Canada will fix you in the next election!

Why the double standard?

[Tricks]

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

If you use terms like that, you are suspect, but if you DON'T hate homosexuals, you still have to admit that Stephen Harper's government got where it is mainly due to the support of the haters of homosexuals.

Wrong yet again. Out of all conservatives, or even right leaning people, I bet 5% really care about gay marriage. If that. It isn't an issue among normal conservatives. You are making generalizations again.

$1:

Are you denying that? After all the hatred shown here by conservatives for welfare and child food programs? What are you smoking?

Nothing. I am completely clean, which I am starting to question with you.

$1:

The best outreach program in Canada today is the Liberal Election Platform.

And it will reach most of the conservative voting base!

Wow, stop hitting the pipe. Seriously, this is scary.

[Always4Iggy]

Always4iggy Always4iggy:

Like wait times - specific promise, now broken.

lily lily:

Wrong. He has been in for a year.

Not so easy to wriggle out of. The promise was to do it by this year end!

Tricks Tricks:

If you want to make a tally of broken promises, how about the promises that liberals made every fucking election for 13 years, and still never delivered. That's at least 3 versus harpers 1. AND THEY WERE THE SAME FUCKING PROMISES!

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

I don't think you get it Tricks. It does not work that way.

Let me give you a simple example. Let us say a son promises his mother that he will mow the lawn. He promises the same thing three days in a row, but does not do it. His mother is disappointed, but she knows her son. He means well and promises sincerely, but he has so many things to worry about, her health, his kids care, you name it.

Then the rich man from next door, who is wooing her, sends his flunkey with a promise - 'Don't depend on your son, I will mow the lawn for you with my thousand dollar automatic mower'

And he fails to do it. NOW the woman is mad! What does the flunkey of the rich bastards mean by playing with her disappointments! Fucking nerve!

So it is like that. Liberals are the sons of the land. Conservatives are the flunkeys of the rich. The c***suckers of millionaires.

When we promise, it is optional. When you promise, you frigging well do it or Canada will fix you in the next election!

lily lily:

Jheeeesh. Either way her lawn's not getting mowed.

What point were you trying to make?

The point is simple. It is not a question of how many promises are made and how many are kept. The question is whether you are a son or the flunkey of a rich man.

Liberals are the sons, they provide for health care, child care, education. The provide for unemployment. They are Friends in Need.

Conservatives are the flunkeys of the rich. They are financed by oil lobbies, cartels and global oligarchies.

If a Liberal government promises something, Canadians are happy, if they do it, Canadians are VERY happy.

If Conservatives do it, Canadians are just politely thankful. But if Cons fail, canadians will not stand for it!

The difference, Lily, if you pardon a pun, is 'striking' !

[Tricks]

lily lily:

$1:

Why the double standard?

Always4Iggy is "my guy or no-one" kind of guy. Haven't you realized he's no more speaking for the Liberals than you are?

Absolutely. Don't you dare think otherwise. I am starting to think he is cagerattler. Someone do an IP check.

[Tricks]

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

The point is simple. It is not a question of how many promises are made and how many are kept. The question is whether you are a son or the flunkey of a rich man.

So....how are the Liberals the son? And the cons the flunkey? I am someone's son. Hell I am 17, so I still live at home.

$1:

Liberals are the sons, they provide for health care, child care, education. The provide for unemployment. They are Friends in Need.

What? My god you are completely off your rocker.

$1:

Conservatives are the flunkeys of the rich. They are financed by oil lobbies, cartels and global oligarchies.

You mean ASS companies?

$1:

If a Liberal government promises something, Canadians are happy, if they do it, Canadians are VERY happy.

If Conservatives do it, Canadians are just politely thankful. But if Cons fail, canadians will not stand for it!

Sweet jesus you have mental issues. What a waste of my time.

$1:

The difference, Lily, if you pardon a pun, is 'striking' !

You really are struggling with the quote function aren't you?

Ok, Lily didn't say anything. You quoted Lily when I should have been, and lily again when it was Avro. Pay attention.

[Always4Iggy]

lily lily:

I wonder if Iggy knows what sort of person he has speaking for him. If yes - I'm sure glad he didn't win the leadership, because that's exactly the sort of thinking the Liberals need to distance themselves from.

Bad luck, sweetheart, but that trick won't work any more!

You see, Iggy is now back in control and Harpers worst nightmare is standing right besides Dion, making the Conservative caucus feel a sudden dampness in their trousers!

This is what Team Liberal looks like to them:

[OnTheIce]

Always4Iggy Always4Iggy:

lily lily:

I wonder if Iggy knows what sort of person he has speaking for him. If yes - I'm sure glad he didn't win the leadership, because that's exactly the sort of thinking the Liberals need to distance themselves from.

Bad luck, sweetheart, but that trick won't work any more!

You see, Iggy is now back in control and Harpers worst nightmare is standing right besides Dion, making the Conservative caucus feel a sudden dampness in their trousers!

This is what Team Liberal looks like to them:

Team Liberal looks really scary with a guy that wasn't the first choice of 83% of delegates, a former seperatist and being in debt to the tune of 33 million.

Them Liberals look very scary.