CKA Forums
Login 
canadian forums
bottom
 
 
Canadian Forums

Author Topic Options
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member
Profile
Posts: 37
PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 11:58 am
 


Anyone remember the Sprung Greenhouse fiasco? In 1987, Newfoundland Premier Brian Peckford attempted to boost local employment by subsidizing the building of a massive hydroponic greenhouse operation that its inventor, Philip Sprung, said would turn the province into a world leader in green produce. His plan had failed in Alberta, but in Peckford he found a gullible partner willing to abandon common sense and start signing over other people’s money...

People in Ontario ridiculed the Sprung fiasco at the time. But I guess we didn’t really learn anything, for now we are madly building our own versions of the Sprung greenhouses. This time they are called wind turbines.

http://www.enviralment.ca/2011/01/10/mc ... rden-path/


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:03 pm
 


One thing is Ontario already had a world class green energy commitment, the CANDU nuclear reactor. This has been very expensive over 50 years but is still an interesting technology for the future. Not only did McGunity go green but he ignored what had been done in the province for decades. McGuinty is impervious to this sort of logic, is all about McGuinty.


Offline
CKA Uber
CKA Uber
User avatar
Profile
Posts: 15244
PostPosted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:44 pm
 


The jury is still out on how "green" it is. It does not emit greenhouse gasses, but there are unanswered questions about radioactive contamination. And, as you mentioned, extremely expensive.


Offline
Forum Super Elite
Forum Super Elite
Profile
Posts: 2944
PostPosted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 4:14 am
 


There's questions about the cost of disposing of the radioactive waste. Half the jury is hysterical about the word "radioactive" and won't address the question. When the energy crisis hits big time it'll sober them up. I calculate that in a life time of being nuclear dependent a person would leave behind a cremation size urn of nuclear fuel waste which will decay in 400 years.


Post new topic  Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests




 
     
All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © Canadaka.net. Powered by © phpBB.