| |
YankGreat
Active Member
Posts: 186
 Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:53 pm
Power For Great America!!!! 
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:55 pm
Does your family tree fork?
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:56 pm
YankGreat YankGreat: Power For Great America!!!! Perhaps its time we closed the St. Lawrence to all US sea traffic.
Bet you didn't think of that eh const?
|
Posts: 42160
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:57 pm
can't, it's an international seaway according to treaty
|
YankGreat
Active Member
Posts: 186
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:58 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: Power For Great America!!!! Perhaps its time we closed the St. Lawrence to all US sea traffic. Bet you didn't think of that eh const? Ooooo will that happen?
Bet you didn't think of that huh, dear?
|
Posts: 9956
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:05 pm
Of course the Canadians would simply just agree with this, hey it's for the good of security eh? Ah heck, they already got the border armed, coasts, choppers in the air, prospect of a wall from sea to sea, why not add the great lakes to the list?
Canada 'reserves' the right to do the same but of course they never will. Might make the Americans....concerned like in the north.
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:06 pm
ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: can't, it's an international seaway according to treaty
A treaty between who besides the US & Canada? We would have a pretty strong case considering the river travels directly through the heart of Canada and we could justifiably make it a security issue.
The states, while demanding other nations respect the 10 mile off-shore limit to territory are very bad when it comes to their waters. Would they have ever let a soviet battlegroup conduct drill outside the 10 mile limit in the gilf of mexico?
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:07 pm
YankGreat YankGreat: DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: Power For Great America!!!! Perhaps its time we closed the St. Lawrence to all US sea traffic. Bet you didn't think of that eh const? Ooooo will that happen? Bet you didn't think of that huh, dear? If you guys keep deciding to act as criminals, quite possibly.
|
Wullu
CKA Elite
Posts: 4408
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:34 pm
Ahhh the CBC right on the ball as per normal. We did a Lakes tour this past summer and the USCG boats that provided port security for us in Cleveland, Detroit and Chicago were all armed with 60's. This is news? Don't ever recall seeing a USCG vessel that was not armed except USCGS Eagle.
Matter of fact I do recall seeing another armed vessel in the Lakes last summer....us. 50 cal HMG, 6 pounder saluting guns, Sea Sparrow SAMs, Harpoon ASM, 20mm phalanx and 57mm Bofors. A tad more than a couple lousy little 60's.
Sit back and take a bloody breather. 
|
YankGreat
Active Member
Posts: 186
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:40 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: Power For Great America!!!! Perhaps its time we closed the St. Lawrence to all US sea traffic. Bet you didn't think of that eh const? Ooooo will that happen? Bet you didn't think of that huh, dear? If you guys keep deciding to act as criminals, quite possibly. CRIMINALS?!?!?!?!?!!! Hey, you know that the United States is working for your own safety. YOU DARE CALL AMERICANS CRIMINALS?!?!?!!
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:45 pm
YankGreat YankGreat: DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: Power For Great America!!!! Perhaps its time we closed the St. Lawrence to all US sea traffic. Bet you didn't think of that eh const? Ooooo will that happen? Bet you didn't think of that huh, dear? If you guys keep deciding to act as criminals, quite possibly. CRIMINALS?!?!?!?!?!!! Hey, you know that the United States is working for your own safety. YOU DARE CALL AMERICANS CRIMINALS?!?!?!! The USA cares only for its safety. That fact is indisputable.
|
Posts: 9956
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:46 pm
Wullu Wullu: Matter of fact I do recall seeing another armed vessel in the Lakes last summer....us. 50 cal HMG, 6 pounder saluting guns, Sea Sparrow SAMs, Harpoon ASM, 20mm phalanx and 57mm Bofors. A tad more than a couple lousy little 60's.
You wouldn't happen to have a name for this vessel other than "us", would you?
|
Posts: 12398
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:46 pm
YankGreat YankGreat: DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: DerbyX DerbyX: YankGreat YankGreat: Power For Great America!!!! Perhaps its time we closed the St. Lawrence to all US sea traffic. Bet you didn't think of that eh const? Ooooo will that happen? Bet you didn't think of that huh, dear? If you guys keep deciding to act as criminals, quite possibly. CRIMINALS?!?!?!?!?!!! Hey, you know that the United States is working for your own safety. YOU DARE CALL AMERICANS CRIMINALS?!?!?!! Well you should know, yous guy's have HYPERCRIME
|
Wullu
CKA Elite
Posts: 4408
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:48 pm
DerbyX DerbyX: ShepherdsDog ShepherdsDog: can't, it's an international seaway according to treaty A treaty between who besides the US & Canada? We would have a pretty strong case considering the river travels directly through the heart of Canada and we could justifiably make it a security issue. The states, while demanding other nations respect the 10 mile off-shore limit to territory are very bad when it comes to their waters. Would they have ever let a soviet battlegroup conduct drill outside the 10 mile limit in the gilf of mexico? And a big chunk through the heart of the US as well Derb...double edged sword there.
|
 
|
Page 1 of 3
|
[ 43 posts ] |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
|
CKA Uber 
CKA Uber 
