[Scape]

$1:

Connie Fogal, Leader of the Canadian Action Party, says, "So much for conspiracy theories! Now we have the ugly truth fully exposed. The US military really does now run Canada. "

The US military is on Canadian soil forbidding the Municipality of Papineauville from renting a hall to the Council of Canadians who planned a public meeting to be held the day before the Three Amigos meet in Montebello, Quebec, Canada August 20, 21 2007 to plan their next moves in the dismantling of their respective countries of Canada, USA and Mexico.

CAP's leader said,"Bad enough that our RCMP and the Quebec provincial police force would apply offensive Canadian law to prevent a legitimate meeting of dissenting citizens. Totally untenable that a foreign army assumes jurisdiction on our land. But this we knew from the Binational Planning Agreement begun in 2002 that saw Canada crawl on its belly and permit the USA military to enter our land whenever it deems necessary. "

"Does anyone still believe that our federal leaders have not thrown away our sovereignty ? That from Chretien (Liberal) to Martin (Liberal) to Harper (Conservative), the Prime Ministers of this our land have not been committing treason behind closed doors? How otherwise would it be possible that a proud, sovereign, and free nation would see a foreign army on its soil interfering with the right of Canadians to assemble and to speak?"

"And , Canada's silent loyal opposition has meanwhile been neither loyal nor an opposition ! US military on Canadian soil ordering Canadians did not happen overnight!"

Connie Fogal, leader of the Canadian Action Party, urges all Canadians to say NO to the criminalization of dissent on our land.

She pointed out,"So they put up a fence! So they impose a 25 kilometer no go zone! So they halt vehicles with five or more people in them! So we be on the edge propelling the power of our inner energy to stare at them through their barriers! We can just stand and stare!There is something very ludicrous about three leaders of alleged free countries hiding from their citizens."

Connie Fogal , leader of the Canadian Action Party, encourages all liberty loving Americans, and Mexicans, as well as Canadians to protest this third annual meeting of national leaders who are bent on destroying our constitutional and civil rights. She urges,"Let us join hands in peaceful right of protest, standing firm and tall, determined and strong in acknowledgement that our nations belong to us the people,and that no shadow government, no military, no treacherous politicians or officials are going to take them away from us. "

[Tricks]

Can we get any more misleading or biased? I expect better from you Scape.

[ziggy]

Sarcasm on right?

[Tricks]

ziggy ziggy:

Sarcasm on right?

I seriously hope so.

[Tricks]

Wow. Here's the link.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php? ... a&aid=6313

[ziggy]

Hmmmm,the three amigo's?

$1:

The US military is on Canadian soil forbidding the Municipality of Papineauville from renting a hall to the Council of Canadians who planned a public meeting to be held the day before the Three Amigos meet in Montebello, Quebec, Canada August 20, 21 2007 to plan their next moves in the dismantling of their respective countries of Canada, USA and Mexico.

Sounds like someone has an agenda.

[hurley_108]

It's no joke.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/new ... 6b5370e3aa

[ziggy]

hurley_108 hurley_108:

It's no joke.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/new ... 6b5370e3aa

No kidding,the president of the USA is there. But lets not just blame the US.

$1:

But Brent Patterson, the council's director of organizing, said a Papineauville official called late Tuesday to say the RCMP, the Surete du Quebec and the U.S. army would not allow the municipality to rent the facility to the council for the planned forum.

[Tricks]

hurley_108 hurley_108:

It's no joke.

http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/new ... 6b5370e3aa

We weren't talking about the story. We were talking about the spin.

[hurley_108]

The venue in dispute is, according to the article, six kilometers away from the site where the leaders are meeting. What possible security threat exists? What justifies the muzzling of an opposing point of view? None and nothing.

[ziggy]

hurley_108 hurley_108:

The venue in dispute is, according to the article, six kilometers away from the site where the leaders are meeting. What possible security threat exists? What justifies the muzzling of an opposing point of view? None and nothing.

Like the Kananaskis during Cretians visit? More than 6 kliks blocked off there.
cant blame them for heightened security.

[hurley_108]

ziggy ziggy:

hurley_108 hurley_108:

The venue in dispute is, according to the article, six kilometers away from the site where the leaders are meeting. What possible security threat exists? What justifies the muzzling of an opposing point of view? None and nothing.

Like the Kananaskis during Cretians visit? More than 6 kliks blocked off there.
cant blame them for heightened security.

Right, I forgot, security trumps freedom. Thanks for the reminder.

[ziggy]

hurley_108 hurley_108:

ziggy ziggy:

hurley_108 hurley_108:

The venue in dispute is, according to the article, six kilometers away from the site where the leaders are meeting. What possible security threat exists? What justifies the muzzling of an opposing point of view? None and nothing.

Like the Kananaskis during Cretians visit? More than 6 kliks blocked off there.
cant blame them for heightened security.

Right, I forgot, security trumps freedom. Thanks for the reminder.

Lets hope the terrorists get the reminder also.

[hurley_108]

ziggy ziggy:

hurley_108 hurley_108:

ziggy ziggy:

hurley_108 hurley_108:

The venue in dispute is, according to the article, six kilometers away from the site where the leaders are meeting. What possible security threat exists? What justifies the muzzling of an opposing point of view? None and nothing.

Like the Kananaskis during Cretians visit? More than 6 kliks blocked off there.
cant blame them for heightened security.

Right, I forgot, security trumps freedom. Thanks for the reminder.

Lets hope the terrorists get the reminder also.

All I'm saying is it's awfully convenient for Harper, Bush, and Calderon, isn't it, that they can stifle opposition by playing the security card and gobbling up all the available nearby venues under the guise of needeing them to coordiante security activities. Note that they're not pushing the opposition out under a claim that they can't be there, just they the space is needed by security.

[Tricks]

hurley_108 hurley_108:

ziggy ziggy:

hurley_108 hurley_108:

ziggy ziggy:

hurley_108 hurley_108:

The venue in dispute is, according to the article, six kilometers away from the site where the leaders are meeting. What possible security threat exists? What justifies the muzzling of an opposing point of view? None and nothing.

Like the Kananaskis during Cretians visit? More than 6 kliks blocked off there.
cant blame them for heightened security.

Right, I forgot, security trumps freedom. Thanks for the reminder.

Lets hope the terrorists get the reminder also.

All I'm saying is it's awfully convenient for Harper, Bush, and Calderon, isn't it, that they can stifle opposition by playing the security card and gobbling up all the available nearby venues under the guise of needeing them to coordiante security activities. Note that they're not pushing the opposition out under a claim that they can't be there, just they the space is needed by security.

3 leaders of countries in one place merits high security for a brief time. No one is saying they can't get it another time. Way to make something out of nothing.