news Canadian News
Good Afternoon Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Supreme Court puts Chrysler sale on hold

Canadian Content
20674news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Supreme Court puts Chrysler sale on hold


Business | 206751 hits | Jun 08 3:20 pm | Posted by: poquas
7 Comment

The US Supreme Court threw a wrench into the plans to have a quick bankruptcy process at Chrysler LLC, delaying the company's combination with Italian automaker Fiat.

Comments

  1. by avatar poquas
    Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:23 pm
    This is not a good thing for Canada or the US if they're really trying to save jobs.

  2. by avatar RUEZ
    Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:25 pm
    "poquas" said
    This is not a good thing for Canada or the US if they're really trying to save jobs.


    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in an order issued late Monday, granted a request for a delay of that approval sought by Indiana state pension funds
    It's all about money.

  3. by avatar GreenTiger
    Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:10 am
    Yes indeed. The American Supreme Court is composed of 9 old fart millionaires who have a very high job for life.

    This is not a good thing at all for either Canada or the States. People will still get hurt.

  4. by avatar Pseudonym
    Tue Jun 09, 2009 2:26 am
    This is a very good thing. Have any of you looked into how the GM bankruptcy was handled? The bondholders, who have always been placed first, have been shoved behind the UAW. There is something horribly wrong here, and it needs to be stopped. The US government is violating the Constitution and violating all contract law and precedent.

  5. by avatar xerxes
    Tue Jun 09, 2009 3:21 am
    And had the Ch. 11 bankruptcy gone ahead as others have, every GM worker with a pension or other benefits would be screwed over...again. So who's bank sheet is more important to protect, the shareholders of GM (who are probably still doing alright) or the workers who've worked hard for their pensions only to see them disappear?

  6. by avatar Pseudonym
    Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:56 am
    Docket from the SCOTUS website:


    The most prominent plantiff here is the Indiana State Police Pension Trust, which is one of these bondholders you deride. From what I have read thus far (which is, admittedly, not much yet), the handling of this bankruptcy goes against judicial precedent and contract law. I reject the notion that the UAW's "need" should take precedence over the law. However, I will step back into my "wait-and-see" mode until I learn more.

  7. by avatar xerxes
    Tue Jun 09, 2009 8:15 am
    And I will join you there.



view comments in forum
Page 1

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • RUEZ Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:06 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net