Tories' focus on oil industry hurting economy: MayPolitical | 207691 hits | Sep 28 9:22 am | Posted by: Eisensapper Commentsview comments in forum Page 1 You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news. |
Who voted on this?
|
Is it just me or does anyone else think she has no idea what she is talking about. I dont even think she knows why our dollar is almost at par with the american.
It's not just you. She is completely out to lunch on everything!
A 5 hour rum and coke session,that would have been fun to watch.
But I also didnt know Dion was a seperatist once either.
A 5 hour rum and coke session,that would have been fun to watch.
So this was the start of a career of flip-flopping.
Canadian citizenship= French citizenship= I'm Canadian now guys!
Separtist= Federalist
Pro-Afghanistan= Anti Afghanistan
Hold the Conservatives accountable= Walk out on every House vote
Green shift= What is this green shift thing people are talking about?
Just one more reason not to let him run anything larger than a lemonade stand.
May is a total waste of a vote. To say the Greens are a single focus party is charitable because a green platform cannot be sustained without an econony. The best they could do is advocate all going back to the trees.
True, but I'm having trouble visualizing Elizabeth
May swinging from a branch...
Harper's Alberta-centric view of Canada works about as well for Ontario and Quebec as Chretien's view of Canada worked for Alberta. The difference is that the backlash, and there will be one eventually, is going to have a majority of the Canadian population behind it.
There have been a fair number of economists who have worried about this. The high energy costs are a double whammy for the manufacturing industry because they push both the dollar and operating costs higher.
Harper's Alberta-centric view of Canada works about as well for Ontario and Quebec as Chretien's view of Canada worked for Alberta. The difference is that the backlash, and there will be one eventually, is going to have a majority of the Canadian population behind it.
Statistics Canada refutes any notion of Dutch Disease in Canada
At first glance, the post-2002 boom in commodity prices and exchange rate appreciation in Canada does seem to resemble the events that precipitated "Dutch Disease", which refers to the combination of a booming resource sector, a rising currency and a resulting decline in output in manufacturing.
However, the Dutch case involved the discovery of a new resource, while Canada's recent trend stems from the integration of emerging nations, particularly China, into the global economy. Also, contrary to the Dutch experience, during which manufacturing faltered in the short term, overall manufacturing output in Canada expanded by 1.3% between 2003 and 2006. The construction and services sectors have also exhibited growth.
The arrival of China has simultaneously lowered the prices of consumer goods and raised resource prices. This combination of price changes initiated by China accelerated a widespread restructuring of the Canadian economy. Strong demand from resource industries has led to higher employment and wage growth.
The increased incomes in the resource industries have fed demand for goods and services, supporting growth in areas such as construction and finance and real estate.
At the same time that manufacturing has shed jobs, its overall output remained steady, supported by advances in the production of machinery and equipment, computers and electronics, as well as primary and fabricated metals. Many of the cuts in manufacturing reflected structural changes in areas such as clothing, autos and forestry products that originated for reasons other than the rising exchange rate.
Not only are wages and incomes on the rise but the appreciating Canadian dollar, rising commodity prices and falling manufacturing prices have meant that Canadians' purchasing power has increased. As Canada's terms of trade improved, with imported goods becoming relatively less expensive even as resource prices rose, Canada has been able to turn its resource exports into more imported manufactured products.
The integration of emerging countries into the global economy is symbolized by the surge in China's growth, which coincided with the boom in resource prices after 2002. The resource boom in Canada resulted in higher wages, attracting individuals, primarily from the Atlantic Provinces, to the West, notably Alberta. Inter-provincial net migration to Alberta averaged 24,000 per year from 2003 to 2006. In 2006 alone, Alberta received 57,000 migrants from other provinces, the largest movement of people to a province on record back to 1972.
http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/ ... 007017.pdf
One does not have to be a genius to understand the viability and prudence of the Iceland economy and the long term benefits that will result so why is this any different?
"That would help bring our dollar back to more of its historic relationship with the U.S. dollar and that would help our manufacturing sector," May said in an interview with CTV's Canada AM.
"Too much focus on producing oil in one region has hurt the rest of the country's economy."
Translation = WE want the dollar to suck so that Ontario and Quebec will be able to be the big dogs in the fight for federal table scraps. OH and I might get a few more votes for saying so.
I think Harper has a few things in mind that he needs a mandate for. He may do somethings sooner then later to bring inflation back to a dull roar and they are going to hurt a bit. I don't see him tossing billions out to his friends like south of the border.