news Canadian News
Good Evening Guest | login or register
  • Home
    • Canadian News
    • Popular News
    • News Voting Log
    • News Images
  • Forums
    • Recent Topics Scroll
    •  
    • Politics Forums
    • Sports Forums
    • Regional Forums
  • Content
    • Achievements
    • Canadian Content
    • Famous Canadians
    • Famous Quotes
    • Jokes
    • Canadian Maps
  • Photos
    • Picture Gallery
    • Wallpapers
    • Recent Activity
  • About
    • About
    • Contact
    • Link to Us
    • Points
    • Statistics
  • Shop
  • Register
    • Gold Membership
  • Archive
    • Canadian TV
    • Canadian Webcams
    • Groups
    • Links
    • Top 10's
    • Reviews
    • CKA Radio
    • Video
    • Weather

Preliminary work underway on High Arctic naval

Canadian Content
20709news upnews down
Link Related to Canada in some say

Preliminary work underway on High Arctic naval port


Military | 207068 hits | Aug 05 2:22 pm | Posted by: Hyack
17 Comment

Officials with the Department of National Defence say they are moving ahead with plans to build a military deep-sea port in Nunavut's High Arctic, with a team surveying the site this summer

Comments

  1. by avatar uwish
    Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:29 pm
    good to hear....

    the sooner the better

  2. by avatar BartSimpson  Gold Member
    Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:40 pm
    About bloody time.

  3. by Anonymous
    Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:46 pm
    Hope they address the fuel and food shortage thats plauged the arctic for 3 years now.
    Funny how thats low priority but a base to watch for non existant russians is.

    Dont get me wrong,im all for any deep port up there.They need fuel and food,more then soldiers.

    On a related note they are doing major work and upgrading on the DEW line for the first time in years.
    I could have went but its like 5 months on and very little time off.

  4. by avatar commanderkai
    Tue Aug 05, 2008 9:48 pm
    Agreed with everyone else (two people but hey) Its about time.

  5. by Anonymous
    Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:10 pm
    "commanderkai" said
    Agreed with everyone else (two people but hey) Its about time.


    Dont you think our govt. should address the fuel and food shortage up there the last 3 or 4 years first?

    The one reason the Innuit approved so heartily was because they thought this would ease those problems.

    Why do people ignore all the stories that have been on the news about the shortages and pay more attention to fearmongering about Russian subs?

    I must have posted ten news stories this february from the kivalik and not one response was to be had.
    Yet post one blurb from the media about Russians coming or hans island getting scooped and everyones up in arms. :roll:

    Sometimes I just gotta shake my head.

  6. by avatar commanderkai
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:03 am
    "ziggy" said
    Agreed with everyone else (two people but hey) Its about time.


    Dont you think our govt. should address the fuel and food shortage up there the last 3 or 4 years first?

    The one reason the Innuit approved so heartily was because they thought this would ease those problems.

    Why do people ignore all the stories that have been on the news about the shortages and pay more attention to fearmongering about Russian subs?

    I must have posted ten news stories this february from the kivalik and not one response was to be had.
    Yet post one blurb from the media about Russians coming or hans island getting scooped and everyones up in arms. :roll:

    Sometimes I just gotta shake my head.

    Okay, I didn't notice that you posted first, so don't think I intended to ignore you. Anyway, I think once the upgrade begins, the government WILL have to face the supply issue, since, as we all know, government always needs more resources and money to complete anything. Once they realize that steel, gasoline, concrete and whatever else is ALOT harder to acquire in the North, they will start to upgrade infrastructure.

    That's my opinion though. I will never claim to be an expert on Northern supply lines. The Americans have it easy with Alaska, considering its not a series of islands. I think with this base, it'd be easier to get some ice breakers refueled, thus allowing supply ships through faster as well.

  7. by Anonymous
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:32 am
    "commanderkai" said
    Agreed with everyone else (two people but hey) Its about time.


    Dont you think our govt. should address the fuel and food shortage up there the last 3 or 4 years first?

    The one reason the Innuit approved so heartily was because they thought this would ease those problems.

    Why do people ignore all the stories that have been on the news about the shortages and pay more attention to fearmongering about Russian subs?

    I must have posted ten news stories this february from the kivalik and not one response was to be had.
    Yet post one blurb from the media about Russians coming or hans island getting scooped and everyones up in arms. :roll:

    Sometimes I just gotta shake my head.

    Okay, I didn't notice that you posted first, so don't think I intended to ignore you. Anyway, I think once the upgrade begins, the government WILL have to face the supply issue, since, as we all know, government always needs more resources and money to complete anything. Once they realize that steel, gasoline, concrete and whatever else is ALOT harder to acquire in the North, they will start to upgrade infrastructure.

    That's my opinion though. I will never claim to be an expert on Northern supply lines. The Americans have it easy with Alaska, considering its not a series of islands. I think with this base, it'd be easier to get some ice breakers refueled, thus allowing supply ships through faster as well.

    Alaska's a very long ways from this port. About 12 hours or more if it was a straight flight.
    10 hours or more from Winnipeg or Yellowknife to the port in a 737.
    But you would never have a straight flight,milk run all the way. :roll:

    So it might take you 2 or 5 days because nothing moves fast in the arctic.
    And the taxpayers fund the fuel subsidies for up there.
    Jet A or B is not available anywhere,you fly it in at enormous costs.
    Gravel or sand for concrete costs $1000.00 a bag and their the size of boy scout sand bags.
    A bottle of whiskey costs $250.00.

    So I have been mulling over in my head wether I should go back to north of Rankin one last time next week and this thread has made up my mind.
    I'm going back for 2 weeks,then my bud comes back and shuts the camp down for the winter.Anything north of Thompson pretty well shuts down in late september as the Hudson bay starts to freeze in all the fuel barges. 8O
    He's been calling me all week but bad sat links make it hard to get ahold of anyone.

    I'll be looking for the Russians and media people who dont leave their hotel but will still pen an article about the horrors of the north with global climate change and iconic pics of polar bears drowning on the melting ice floes.

    Think I leave on the 13th,good fishing,heli rides! otter rides!
    Camp in a tent! fish at 3:00am and get a freaking sunburn!

    How could I turn this down?
    This is the only good month up there. :o

  8. by Anonymous
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:58 am
    Well,im penciled in and an intinerary is on the way.

    Im going back for 2 weeks.
    Watch this video to see why.


  9. by Anonymous
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:28 am
    The gig is for ten days,I get the old kitchen and no room mates.lol!

    "Zig go's and put's the 60 pound test back on his telescopic rod and gets the Cam equipment ready" 8)

    Fly to winnipeg next week then off to Rankin,I'll keep you folks notified on any Russian sub sightings unless they dont have the spicy sauce and then i'll call 911.

    Fuck....I'm so happy,because exploration camps dont usually have a big budget but this one is making it worthwhile. :o

  10. by avatar cheryl08
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:59 am
    Finally, this whould have been done a while ago. The North seems to always be left unattended but i guess thats all changing with the warmer temperatures.

  11. by avatar herbie
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:48 am
    "ziggy" said
    Agreed with everyone else (two people but hey) Its about time.


    Dont you think our govt. should address the fuel and food shortage up there the last 3 or 4 years first?

    The one reason the Innuit approved so heartily was because they thought this would ease those problems.

    Why do people ignore all the stories that have been on the news about the shortages and pay more attention to fearmongering about Russian subs?

    I must have posted ten news stories this february from the kivalik and not one response was to be had.
    Yet post one blurb from the media about Russians coming or hans island getting scooped and everyones up in arms. :roll:

    Sometimes I just gotta shake my head.

    If someone wanted to build the port to ship food they'd be called a socialist. Isn't playing soldiers more important than feeding citizens?
    Maybe a couple Russian ships will drop in to refuel there and they'll sell vodka and caviar cheaper than you can buy hot dog buns....

  12. by avatar Arctic_Menace
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:38 am
    I somehow see proper highways to Tuktoyaktuk and Churchill eventually being built. :lol:

  13. by avatar llama66
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:25 am
    I dunno how possible highways are in the high arctic with the constant freezing and melting of the permafrost, and the prospect of possible climate change effects.

  14. by avatar Scape
    Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:34 am
    Polar bear vs dog



view comments in forum
Page 1 2

You need to be a member of CKA and be logged into the site, to comment on news.

  • Login
  • Register (free)
 Share  Digg It Bookmark to del.icio.us Share on Facebook


Who voted on this?

  • Schleihauf Tue Aug 05, 2008 4:35 pm
  • allan_17 Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:58 pm
Share on Facebook Submit page to Reddit
CKA About |  Legal |  Advertise |  Sitemap |  Contact   canadian mobile newsMobile

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2025 by Canadaka.net