[housewife]

Well that’s not going to happen the US is far too divided to even agree to look at their constitution little on agree to re-write it. They can’t even agree that there’s a global pandemic even though it’s killed a huge amount of their own people.

[Scape]

^^ that is what festers fascism. When simple solutions to complex problems are summed up in a campaign slogan. The Gordian knot will be cut by civil war, then they can write whatever they want in the constitution but they will be ruling over ashes.

[Tricks]

DrCaleb DrCaleb:

xerxes xerxes:

Scape Scape:

Since Nixon it was taboo for judges to legislate from the bench AND unless it was in black and white on the constitution written by slave owners and only if it was an appeal from a lower court could the supreme court rule. This was seen as a way to keep in check rights getting assigned to anyone and anything not white, male, god fearing land owners.

This is the mandate as the cons see it and they want that will inflicted upon everyone. Bully pulpit is the term used to describe the power of the presidency but this is how the conservative minority in the states have wielded their power. This in conjunction with an incompetent opposition (dems) has the effect of ratcheting laws and norms to the right slowly and constantly. Every misstep is used to regress this process further and this is why is creeps up because they are not presenting new laws and legislation but constrict and remove existing laws and kneecap anything new on the books if they can't outright veto it.

The problem with unwritten rules is that they're only as good as the people who abide by them.

The problem is they are working from a 250 year old document that was 'perfect' when it was written. It was written with very little about how the Supreme Court works, and the theory is those blanks would be filled in. Well, they haven't.

What they need to do is a constitutional re-write to take into account all the things that time has changed.

The funny thing is they don't (for this). The 9th amendment exists for a reason. They just fucking ignore it. Something does not need to be specifically enumerated as a right to b considered a right under the constitution. James Madison and Hamilton saw these motherfuckers coming 250 years ago.

[herbie]

housewife housewife:

Well that’s not going to happen the US is far too divided to even agree to look at their constitution little on agree to re-write it. They can’t even agree that there’s a global pandemic even though it’s killed a huge amount of their own people.

A million dead can't convince a lot of them.
Mass shootings every fucking day can't convince them
Many, including the Supreme Court think that they, personally, are 'a miltitia'
Judges are 'elected', by popularity over qualifications
Supreme Court Judges are appointed for their political views over their legal skills.

What could possibly go wrong?
Many Canadians criticize our 40 year old Constitution's faults. What could be wrong with following a 250 ear old one as Scripture. Oh yeah... Talibaptists... scripture MUST be followed.. (especially if it's Old Testament)

[Scape]

The end of Roe v. Wade, and what comes next

$1:

Today on Front Burner, UC Davis legal historian Mary Ziegler — author of Dollars for Life: The Anti-Abortion Movement and the Fall of the Republican Establishment — discusses why the conservative-majority court overturned Roe v. Wade, why modern abortion bans have dangers not seen since the 1970s and what widespread criticism of the decision means for the perceived legitimacy of the court.

Cases that the court takes up and rules upon are entirely voluntary. They rule when the is division in lower courts. When they ruled to strike down Roe they effectively said 'scouts honor we promise not to go further' but they LIED to get the seat to begin with so that means NOTHING. As soon as Trump filled those seats all bets are off and so too is the legitimacy of the court itself.

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWfixK01nG0

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz_GifQ ... Sw&index=2

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhCd_8E ... Sw&index=3

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ge4Uvcl ... Sw&index=5



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTxjgVc ... Sw&index=8

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0eTMlrW ... WL&index=2


Who wants to tell her?

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JYJeMH ... WL&index=5

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GQdNFQ ... WL&index=3

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6XWO0q ... WL&index=2

AOC and Razorfist on the same page. Truly the end times.

[Scape]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7GfuT4 ... WL&index=3

[housewife]

Scape Scape:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JYJeMH ... WL&index=5

That one is very good and very true. It’s not a right and wrong debate. There’s so many variables in the decision it’s a very hard decision that I’ve never had to make. When I was asked what I thought a friend should do I told her it was a decision she had to live with not me so my opinion was useless. An adult conversation with judgement and blaming would be good. The only time the answer is uncomplicated is when it’s medical. Or I should say usual uncomplicated. I do know someone who after an accident as a child was told she couldn’t get pregnant when after years of marriage and adopting two kids she found she was pregnant she continued the pregnancy against doctors advice. It almost killed her and the baby but nothing would sway her. There’s some in her family that still won’t forgive her for that decision. Right or wrong it was hers and her husband’s decision.