Scape Scape:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBJGrd5 ... WL&index=3Ugh, bad take Saagar has a point. CNN and MSNBC have been beating the drums for direct conflict without a lot of reflection. I give reporters on the ground a pass on the humanitarian angle because they are there but there is a responsibility of the anchors to reel it in. The culture of the media doesn't know what limits are and nothing gets eyeballs like war porn.
That said Russians dying and suffering from harsh treatment while invading a sovereign country deserve what they get. Saagar both siding this was hard to stomach but it was more sober than what Ali Veshi or Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton were pushing for.
Saagar is full of shit - NATO has fought many conflicts to end genocide and war crimes in the past 30 years. They went into the Balkans (former Yugoslavia and Kosovo) when the UN couldn't handle it, they went into Libya, and they've worked together elsewhere to deal with terrorists.
I understand his trepidation in going full on against Russia, but at the same time, we need to stand up for what's right and not just let Ukrainians fight Russia as our proxy.
NATO needs to transfer Mig-29s, T-72s, and anything else Ukraine needs, and at the same time, we need to be ready to act when Putin crosses the line into WMD use. I'd even support equipping Ukraine with long range surface to surface missiles so they can take the fight into Russia.
If we let Russia get away with this, then there will be potential future conflicts with other nuclear armed nations (North Korea, Pakistan, China) that think they can do whatever they want just because they have nukes.