Author | Topic Options |
---|---|
[QUOTE BY= Stymiest] Yes Canadian soldiers did commit a huge offense there and it was not a very good for the armed forces appeal at home and i think it hurt the credibility of the military a lot. The regiment sent over to Somalia was the NATO rapid reaction force also known as the Canadian airborne regiment. This regiment was the canadian army's elite force but unfortunately cutbacks and other things had degraded this regiment. Not only that but it was also seen as a dumping ground for behaviour problems. But the Airborne was disbanded after somalia and thats another story for another time.
<br />
<br />[/QUOTE]
<br />
<br />No, it's a story for right now. <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/smile.gif' alt='Smile'>
<br />
<br />Somalia was a failing of the command structure. We soldiers were not given a clear mandate from the top (Kim Cambell) on down. Violations of the Geneva convention were performed by a few soldiers, and their superiors turned a blind eye to them.
<br />
<br />Kim Cambell closed the inquiry into Somalia while these things were being found out, and blamed the entire Airborne squadron for the actions of a few. The inquiry would have found that as Defence Minister, ultimate responsibilty for Somalia and it's failings would have fell to the desk commanders who had no field experience, and ultimately, Kim Cambell. Only 2 people were charged with anything there, Kyle Green was the only one to do time for his actions. (The other is brain dead from a suicide attempt).
<br />
<br />I agree with you that we need more ground pounders, but we also need less brass and administration. But our military has always been professionals, otherwise we would not have pulled off the fantastic results in Bosnia less than a year later.
<br />
Take the Kama Sutra. How many people died from the Kama Sutra as opposed to the Bible? - Frank Zappa |
![]() ![]() |
Page 3 of 3 |
[ 36 posts ] | Previous 1 2 3 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |