Marcarc
Forum Elite
Posts: 1870
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:38 am
This was good information but I'd have to disagree with the mode of action. Of course, I always take part in strikes, whether I think them useful or not, however, from an ideological standpoint this action has many problems.<br />
<br />
1. There seem to be three 'problems' that are seeking redress. Logging, water supply, selling of crown land, corporate 'ownership' (though more like leasing in this case).<br />
2. Striking will not affect the change you are looking for simply because owners are not going to participate because it is their control being threatened, which means it would be 'difficult' for workers to strike because they will have no protection.<br />
3. A cross country strike is a logistical nightmare, even a local organization is not easy.<br />
4. If you don't have numbers, then it is hard to get media coverage to let anybody know about what you are doing.<br />
5. If you can't decide on a single issue then I can almost guarantee no media coverage.<br />
<br />
The 'agenda' seemed to be against corporatization in general, so as I've said before, it's not efficient to re-invent the wheel as there are dozens of organizations already fighting those battles. I've got a link in here somewhere that lists many of them but they're easy to find.<br />
<br />
This website won't help in most of these matters unless you post and find people who will take action to help (I'm not convinced of that). However, these arguments seem to attest to the need for 'systemic' change, so, again, I encourage you to check out the thread and the links for direct democracy. The days when people thought environmentalists were the 'special interest' groups are long over. Though it's anecdotal, the only people that would support such a logging operation would be the few people who would get work from it, hardly the majority.<br />
<br />
I would suggest anybody looking or living with rural or semi-rural properties be proactive. If there is a large chunk of land owned by government or industry or a single owner then start an organization, raise funding, BUY the place! Otherwise, quite frankly, you're screwed. Go to the library and watch "Ah..the money, the money, the money", it's an excellent documentary on Salt Springs in British Columbia. Here there was virtually nothing the people could do except break the law to stop the logging. <br />
<br />
If there are any success stories out there I'd love to hear them, because from media you certainly get the idea that you can't fight corporate hall, which is no doubt the point. There are successful proactive stories though, and perhaps we should have links. If people though are looking for action, I suggest either joining, or starting a local organization, it will surprise you how many exist in your area.<br />
<br />
One final pitch for direct democracy-all those decisions that have been mentioned have been POLITICAL decisions, which means somebody is accountable. If you really want to scare the bejesus out of corporate canada and the politicians they own then run as an independant with direct democracy as a platform. Trudeau once mentioned that being next to the US was like sleeping next to an elephant, however, that's been a nap the country was always willing to take, no matter how dangerous. The one place they absolutely fear-is next to the people-what kind of animal does that make us<img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/smile.gif' alt='Smile'>