Marcarc
Forum Elite
Posts: 1870
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:46 am
As a direct democracy candidate I just had to respond to that 'referendums are not democratic', that's the most hilarious thing I've ever heard! Letting people decide things for themselves is un-democratic-Bush would be so proud! Up is down! Black is white! Democracy is federalism!<br />
<br />
Lord knows our current system is not 'prone to abuse', that's because it IS abuse. Canadians have NO democratic rights and apart from voting in a different person to make all their decisions for them vote on NOTHING! If you want to argue that dictatorship and oligarchy are better forms of government, that's one thing, but don't mix up the two!<br />
<br />
Keep in mind history, we are at a different colonial period, almost never has a referendum been held on 'joining a country', in Canada it only happened in Newfoundland and it is still such a contentious issue that you can't even talk about it to a Newfoundlander who was there. The 'constitution' of England was IMPOSED on its colonies and now we've seen that unravelling, violently in places like Ireland and India, more peacefully in Canada which although a country, has many of the marks of a colonial government. And of course we saw how well a constitution served Yugoslavia, Somalia, most African countries in fact. <br />
<br />
Even every monarchy had a constitution, the Czar and the King of France, that didn't help them. A piece of paper cannot hold a people together. But leaving that aside, it is not correct that the Charter holds Canada together, in fact by allowing Quebec to have a referendum they have created a precedence where it can legally be upheld that such referenda must be allowed by other provinces, because it isn't disallowed in the Charter. The Clarity Bill in fact sets out the conditions that must be met by provinces, so the feds might pull the strings but it is still allowed.<br />
<br />
Also a provincial or provisional government can apply under international law to void a constitution if it is 'imposed'. Nowadays, with referenda so popular all over the world it would be next to impossible to ratify a constitution without one. This is partly no doubt why NAFTA and international trade agreements were made, so that business can hold together what politics can't.<br />
<br />