[Diogenes]

Possibly<br />

[Diogenes]

http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl07b.shtml<br /> Get an education<br /> <br /> read the full article <br /> The Man Who Helped Me Open My Eyes <br /> About 14 years ago I visited a Luxembourg bank to deposit some paper money and buy gold coins. I had to wait in line. I started talking to the man behind me in the line. After a while he told me he was a libertarian. After we'd concluded our business we met in a nearby café for coffee. I told him that I was also a libertarian. <br /> <br /> "Libertarian!" he snorted, "practically all so-called libertarians are still so conditioned and so far from the truth, they don't know the first thing about liberty." <br /> <br /> I looked at him in surprise. I considered libertarians to be the leading edge of human evolution. There followed a sometimes heated discussion about many aspects and principles of libertarianism. Time and time again this most extreme radical questioned even the words I used, for example: When I asked, "What about the laws of a country?" my new friend responded: <br /> <br /> "Haw, haw, haw," laughing almost hysterically. I thought he would fall off his chair. Several people in the café looked at him in bemusement. "What about the barking of copulating baboons in the zoo?" he said. <br /> <br /> I was bewildered: "What's so funny?" <br /> <br /> "My friend," he said, "like most so-called libertarians, you don't have the foggiest notion of what exists and what doesn't. You believe in magical "law" like a spiritualist believes in supernatural "ghosts"... except... except that your belief is possibly even more absurd than that of the spiritualist. You see, I've heard of people who claim that they have seen "ghosts"; there are even purported photographs of "ghosts." But I've never heard of anyone who claims that he has seen a so-called "law," never mind photographed it." <br /> <br /> "Anyway," I said, "what does all this have to do with liberty?" <br /> <br /> "My aspirant-libertarian friend," he replied, "When you free your mind >>>from the false concepts and misconceptions that fixate your thinking within the mental grooves fashioned by those who seek to enslave you, then you will discover what liberty really is, then you will be able to live free. Most so-called libertarians are like pigs hopelessly floundering in a cesspool of statist concepts. Just as it is almost impossible for a fish to imagine life on land, so it is very difficult, if at all possible, for an aspirant-libertarian locked into statist concepts, to conceive of life outside his self-created cesspool..." <br /> <br /> For a while we were both silent. Then he continued, "In actuality, the whole world is libertarian. Individuals are supreme, whether they know it or not. We all have virtually unlimited choice all the time - we may assume notions and beliefs that limit our choice, we may also get ourselves into situations where choice is limited... but those are also choices... objectively, there are no so-called "states," "governments," "kings," "queens," etc.; there never have been and there never will be - I have asked many people to show me a "government" and to tell me what it looks like. Nobody has been able to do that. Of course, there are hucksters and humbuggers who call themselves "government," "king," or "president"... just as there are suckers who believe them - who blindly obey them - who blindly oppose them." <br /> <br /> "One needs to live one's life in accordance with actuality: what is, what exists, what occurs. So I live my life out of a context of liberty, a libertarian enclave, an anarcho-libertarian enclave. I carry it with me like an aura. I have abilities: the ability called life, the ability to own property, the ability to produce, the ability to exchange, the ability to communicate. And my abilities do not depend on the agreement of others. I am supreme. I am responsible for every aspect of my life. My self-esteem, my power, and my liberty can only be curbed by my own limitations. There are of course those who think otherwise, who would seek to violate my abilities - what you might call "rights." When making choices, I take that into consideration." <br /> <br /> As we parted he gave me a poem he'd written... It really made me think. <br /> <br /> The Enemy Within <br /> <br /> Why do you fear his "parliament," <br /> This all oppressive "government," <br /> When darker things lurk deep inside <br /> Your mind; crawling, scuttling, they hide. <br /> <br /> Worse by far than "police-state law," <br /> More corrupt than any "legislature," <br /> Taxing far above the progressive rate; <br /> A self-made ghost does, your soul subjugate. <br /> <br /> For the "rulers of men" are naught but dust <br /> They rise, dictate, but fall they must. <br /> Though out of sight, not out of mind, see? <br /> The "ghost in the machine" saying - you're not free. <br /> <br /> Oh deeply wounding psychoplasm. <br /> Why hauntest thou in the mind's chasm? <br /> Why crippleth thee what gives thee home, <br /> Why soil thy nest like a common gnome? <br /> <br /> Out, out damn spook, begone I say! <br /> For I have resolved, myself, this day, <br /> That I stand free in body and soul, <br /> Not hindered by chains nor ghoul. <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

http://www.mind-trek.com/treatise/ls-tbj/ch2.htm <br /> <br /> For those with a mind for it here are points of consideration with respect to the trickery of “law”<br /> <br /> By careful reading and perhaps re-reading it will be discovered how convoluted the language of law was set out to be.<br /> Pay particular attention to the phrase “Nullus liber homo capiatur, vel impresonetur, aut disseisetur de libero tenemento, vel libertatibus, vel liberis consuetudinibus suis, aut utlagetur, aut exuletur, aut aliquo modo destruatur, nec super eum ibimus, nec super eum mittemus, nisi per legale judicium parium suorum, vel per legem terrae. <br /> The most common translation of these words, at the present day, is as follows: <br /> No freeman shall be arrested, or imprisoned, or deprived of his freehold, or his liberties, or free customs, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor will we (the king) pass upon him, nor condemn him, unless by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land. <br /> "Nec super eum ibimus, nec super eum mittemus."<br /> There has been much confusion and doubt as to the true meaning of the words, "nec super eum ibimus, nec super eum mittemus." The more common rendering has been, "nor will we pass upon him, nor condemn him." But some have translated them to mean, "nor will we pass upon him, nor commit him to prison." Coke gives still a different rendering, to the effect that "No man shall be condemned at the king's suit, either before the king in his bench, nor before any other commissioner or judge whatsoever."11 <br /> But all these translations are clearly erroneous””<br /> Me again><br /> Not only are the translations erroneous, the are convoluted, turning back on them-selves. And why is this important?, you may ask.<br /> Because Dear Fellow travelers we live <u><i>under the law </i></u><br /> Law that is created by those who rule us! And what they say it is, it is!<br />

[rearguard]

[QUOTE BY= Milton] I thought Borat was an anti ...stan country film and portrayed people from these countries as being incestuous, immoral, illiterate, backwards etc. IMO this is the reason that the JDL/CJC etc. have not attacked it.[/QUOTE]<br /> <br /> The character "Borat" is played by actor Sacha Baron Cohen who is Jewish.<br />

[Diogenes]

"Sacha Baron Cohen who is Jewish"<br /> and therein lies the iromy<br /> the movie has many levels <br /> and insults, too. Misogyny in abundance, with many ‘holy cows’ being sacrificed. Humour too.<br /> But rg, twern’t why I directed your attention to this page here no harm no fowl <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 9423072580<br /> <br /> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1741474640042234806<br /> <br /> a little something for my new toy: Gwest <br />

[Diogenes]

With all this falderal going on on these pages I renewed my interest in right/dead right and thankfully google complied and offered the following . I wonder what percentage of rightness and dead rightness exists in today’s society, God knows I have had my share and once noticing that I do, I do modify my behaviours- even if sporadically<br /> <br /> http://rightmansyndrome.com/ <br /> “Right Man Syndrome – Depressive Thinking Patterns<br /> These patterns serve to shield The Right Man from the effects of his own behavioural patterns. He tends to negate feedback from other people in relation to his own behaviours. The relationship that this establishes is as follows:<br /> “I get to behave however I want to – with impunity – you are the one that has to make the adjustment and just accept me for what I am.” <br /> And the blaming position of...<br /> “My anger/depression is a direct response of your behaviours; whilst your behaviours are nothing to do with me.”<br /> The effect upon the third party often takes the form of exasperation, hopelessness, helplessness and depression. The Right Man often manages to leave a trail of anxiety, despair, self-doubt and depression everywhere he goes. <br /> Pattern #1 – “There Are No Shades of Grey” - Black and White Thinking.<br /> With this pattern we see that moderation and mediation are not permissible. Everything is either one thing or another, anything in between is simply not allowed.<br /> Thus The Right Man will often be an alcoholic or will abstain completely. He either loves someone totally or hates them emphatically; you are either completely on his side or you are against him totally, and so on. Yet oddly in spite of all the obvious behaviours to the contrary, he will often claim to not have a view on the matter at all.”<br /> <br /> When I became a ware of either/or thinking through Edward de Bono I started to make the change away from it.<br /> Any who take note of my posts will recognize my stance on either/or thinking, but hey! <br /> I have nothing of value to contribute here LOL<br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

I stand accused of being an Anti-Semitic, or more properly Anti-Jewish and focusing on one ethnic group (to target?) <br /> A ridiculous charge, to be sure! My '<b><i>fixation</i></b>' on this topic arose because I seek truth. There have been many connections drawn between Khzarian Jews and world domination. I find these links to be worthy of examination and a concern for any who profess to "<i>love</i>" freedom. <br /> <br /> I was taught and believe that one does for love what is necessary to preserve integrity and dignity of life and living.<br /> <br /> Recently here there has been a movement afoot to silence my thoughts by banishment and much to the credit of cooler heads who identified the tactics used to do so were based on false claims borne of hatred. I have thus far been allowed to stay.<br /> <br /> It seems the major players in the little charade seem to believe that by stifling free though some greater good will have been served. That was their assertion, as I see it. <br /> <br /> And what really would be gained should I be banished from these pages?<br /> <br /> That is an important question and one each reader would be wise to examine.<br /> <br /> When there is a threat of lose of freedom to one there is a threat to all. <br /> <br /> <br /> "During the course of this work salient facts and issues will be presented without a too-extensive reliance on tedious historical documentation. However, considering the delicacy of the subject -- especially in this modern age where any divergence from certain agendas for "political correctness" can result in epithets of racism or anti-Semitism -- and for the obvious sake of accuracy, reasonably comprehensive documentation is necessary.<br /> <br /> In this it will be shown that the cry of "anti-Semitism" hurled against those who do oppose the international actions of ones calling themselves Jews, would be much like an immigrated Scotsman to America deciding to live on an Apache Indian reservation, coming to dominate its politics and economics, and then claiming that anyone disagreeing with his political and social agenda is racist and anti-Apache in their beliefs."-<br /> http://www.apfn.org/THEWINDS/library/khazars.html <br /> <br /> I do not have to be told on pain of punishment "what" to think I only have to be instucted to think and given the tools by which to do so.<br /> <br /> http://www.ipfw.edu/phil/faculty/Long/Summer%2004/120SU204/1WhatIsCriticalThinking.ppt#262,1,CRITICAL THINKING <br /> <br /> <br />

[h.f. wolff]

Methinks the 'new' politically correct term for "those who must not be criticized" is Zionist.<br /> <br /> This label seems to appear in more and more of the critical literature and discussions.<br /> <br /> H.F. Wolff

[Diogenes]

"This label seems to appear in more and more of the critical literature and discussions.<br /> As it should!<br /> <br /> Crossing threads when done with intent results in the warp and weft becoming fabric<br /> <br /> <br /> "BASIC CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS<br /> Knowing when someone is taking a position on an issue, which means knowing<br /> <br /> what the issue is, and<br /> what the person’s claim is about it. <br /> <br /> Knowing what considerations are relevant to the issue.<br /> <br /> Knowing whether the reasoning (if any) underlying the person’s claims is good reasoning.<br /> <br /> Knowing whether, everything considered, we should accept, reject, or suspend judgment on what the person claimed.<br /> <br /> Being levelheaded and objective and not being influenced by extraneous factors."<br /> <br /> <br /> It is in the knowing what the issue is rather than rhetorical ramblings where the trap lies

[Diogenes]

http://www.mayanmajix.com/UCC_course_4.pdf <br /> COURSE 4 - REDEMPTION <br /> PURPOSE: To find out what group you are in <br /> <br /> Provides a brief summary on the differences in bodies of law by definition <br /> <br /> More definitions regarding titles, property and possession <br /> <br /> Gives an overall view on how to get back control of your universe <br /> <br /> Explains how to make the UCC-1 contract and how to properly file it <br /> <br /> Explains how to establish own private treaty with the world <br /> <br /> FINAL PRODUCT: The ability to control one’s body and one’s property <br /> <br /> How ya like them pickled pumpkins?

[Diogenes]

<br /> “I want to know what <b>you</b> think. What are <b>your</b> thoughts? <br /> Not some cut and pastes word salad that <b>isn’t</b> your own!” <br /> <br /> These are the words of the detractor who places selective faith in original thought while ignoring collective wisdom .<br /> The extreme pettiness and ignorance of those words are enough for me to rebound off of them at the speed of light and a ten-fold force which in turn gives ammunition to fixed in place minds and mind set.<br /> The following words are not mine and I agrees with them. Does the fact the words didn’t originate with me lessen any importance of them?<br /> <br /> “Got Honesty?<br /> If you think you have honesty in your life, think long and hard. Think about it in different ways at the same time. There can seemingly be honesty at one level while there is complete pandemonium at all others. Life can go on as if everything is OK right up until the time that chaos is apparent. That is when the house of cards — built by lies — comes crashing down. The effort required to rebuild after that point will only be available over a very long period of time. That applies to economic and political factors.”<br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

I haven't posted here for an while to let the fervour simmer down on what has been miss identified as anti-Semitic posts and thought but it is about time to not let labels stand in the way of commenting on atrocities that seen now to be the stock and trade of the Zionist faction of Israel<br /> I offer to articles for your considerations <br /> http://www.imemc.org/article/49548 <br /> http://www.rense.com/general77/vindi.htm<br />

[Diogenes]

and now for something completely different, or is it?<br /> http://www.ild.org.pe/eng/other_en2.htm<br /> <br /> http://www.ild.org.pe/eng/other_c1_en.htm<br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

The other shoe, as it were.<br /> Essentially de Soto is for the Banksters and papering the poor up so they can become slaves to the BIS<br /> <br /> We need more Privateers and less Bankers <br /> Or is that a contradiction in terms?<br /> <br /> http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=104873<br /> <br /> The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else. By Hernando de Soto. New York: Basic Books, 2000. Pp. 276. $27.50, cloth; $14.00, paper.<br /> <br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /> Gary D. Libecap a1<br /> a1 University of Arizona<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In this provocative book, Hernando de Soto argues that the reason why transitional and developing economies have had such limited success with adopting capitalism is the lack of formal property rights for the urban poor. Without legal ownership of the homes they inhabit or the businesses they operate, the poor live in a shadow economy, subject to high risk of expropriation, bureaucratic arbitrariness, and political corruption. The absence of title thwarts investment, limits markets, dampens incentives, and retards economic growth all round. The comparatively poor performance of many Latin American, African, and Asian economies stems not from cultures that are alien to commercial activity, from the legacy of past colonialism, or from low savings rates among the poor. The urban poor are entrepreneurs, and formal property institutions are needed to free their energies and expand their opportunities, allowing them to accumulate desperately needed capital. Currently, the urban poor are forced to hold their wealth in defective forms. This misallocation cripples developing economies. According to de Soto, the potential gain is huge. He argues that despite their lack of affluence, the poor still save, and in the aggregate the amounts exceed by perhaps 40 times all of the foreign aid sent to developing countries since 1945. Freeing up these savings and entrepreneurial energy could lead to a second industrial revolution, and end the disparities of wealth and well-being that differentiate the developed and developing worlds.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />