[Diogenes]

There is really no point in trying to fit the following on the main pages even though that is where the ‘action’ (interchange) chiefly is.<br /> <br /> A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed.<br /> <br /> It wasn’t the world being round that agitated people but that the world wasn’t flat.<br /> <br /> When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic. – Dresden James<br /> <br /> I’m Hip!<br /> I get a lot of accusations of how it is I at fault because I make no sense…<br /> a standard method of attack by those lacking cognition is the assigning of blame.<br /> <br /> Ho Hum!<br /> <br /> Contempt, prior to complete investigation, enslaves men to ignorance. – Dr. John Whitman Ray<br /> Having been a frequent visitor,…<br /> Mea culpa, Mea culpa Mea maxima culpa. And I continue to learn and advance<br /> <br /> <br /> We serve no one by withholding information. We do not serve ourselves by refusing to investigate.<br /> Lack of information never assisted anyone. Accurate information allows us options; we can choose to take<br /> action based upon it or choose to ignore it, but not knowing does not assist us. So put aside your<br /> preconceived notions, your psychological defence mechanisms, and your prejudices. Take a chance on<br /> remembering what could well grant you complete economic, emotional, and spiritual freedom.<br /> Any “Logics” course will teach that we can have a completely logical system which reaches a logical<br /> conclusion yet it is not true because it is based upon a false premise. The mind seems not to care if it<br /> reacts from something that is untrue as long as it feels certainty. So, the best position from which to learn<br /> is from ‘uncertainty’ – ‘being in the question’.<br /> Can we afford to be so arrogant as to pretend we know something we don’t know the knowing of which<br /> could transform our lives – Werner Erhard<br /> <br /> and BTW, Cut & paste serves me that I would be denied my self claimed right to do so has no standing with me.<br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

http://www.fathers.bc.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?=&p=9282<br /> <br /> Justice is Truth in Action <br /> <br /> Notice (of Claim) <br /> DATE: _________________________ <br /> Dear M.P. _______________________ <br /> CC: TWIMC <br /> <br /> Hi! I am _______________________ and I recently wrote to you, asking twenty simple questions. I informed you that if you failed to respond and answer those questions, I would answer them for you, and you would be bound by those answers as if they had been your own. As you have had time to respond, and have not, and as I am sure you have seen these questions before, your reluctance to answer is strongly indicative of fraudulent activity. Here are the answers to the questions. Now, if you are ever asked them again, you can refer to this correspondence and your other constituents wou’t have to wait or otherwise feel they are being defrauded. <br /> <br /> What exactly is the number on the back (front) of my Birth Certificate? <br /> Answer: Bond Tracking Number <br /> Why is it not identified as to its function? <br /> Answer: Government does not want us to realize the Bonds’ existence. <br /> Is it a 'bond tracking' number? <br /> Answer: YES! <br /> If so, when was a bond generated <br /> Answer: When our parents registered our birth. <br /> Who generated it? <br /> Answer: The government did, with the apparent consent of our parents. <br /> Did they enjoy informed consent? <br /> Answer: NO, they did not! <br /> What is the value of the bond, assuming there is one? <br /> Answer: At least One Million Dollars <br /> Who owns title to that bond? <br /> Answer: Whoever holds The Record of Live Birth (Government) <br /> Does that bond generate revenue? <br /> Answer: If it does not, someone is guilty of either theft, or gross negligence. <br /> Does my pledge, promise, oath or obligation, support the bond, if there is one? <br /> Answer: YES! <br /> If yes, when did I pledge, promise or make oath? <br /> Answer: Your parents initially made oath, you confirmed when you applied for your SIN. <br /> If there is no money in my bond generating revenue, who stole my money? <br /> Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. <br /> Who initially put money in the bond? <br /> Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. <br /> Is interest paid on that bond? <br /> Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. <br /> If so, to whom and how much interest is paid? <br /> Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. <br /> Does the revenue generated by the bond, if there is any, form part of the 'Federal Transfer Payments' the Federal and Provincial levels of government bicker over? <br /> Answer: YES! <br /> Would either level of representation have the right to control or access those payments if they were not acting as a representative? <br /> Answer: NO! <br /> To who do those Federal Transfer Payments actually belong? <br /> Answer: Whoever is being represented. <br /> Is there a fiduciary over the bond? <br /> Answer: YES, of ocurse! <br /> If so who is it? <br /> Answer: The Minister of Finance <br /> If not does this mean NO ONE is in charge of the bond? <br /> Is it true we have the right to deny consent to be represented and thus governed? <br /> Answer: Absolutely! <br /> Has your hand been 'in the cookie jar'? <br /> Answer: This requires an RCMP investigation. <br /> <br /> As all can tell from our agreed upon answers to these questions, there is clearly a need for an RCMP investigation on five or more seperate issues. If you do not agree this is the case, please get back to me within 7 days. I will be including a copy of this letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP and informing them that both I and my Member of Parliament feel there is a need for an immediate investigation. <br /> <br /> Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill-will, vexation or frivolity, <br /> Will U. Tellme DaTruth <br /> <br /> <br /> All Rights Reserved, Non-Assumpsit, With Prejudice <br /> The Elizabeth Anne Elaine Society <br /> Justice is Truth in Action <br />

[Diogenes]

Walt Kelly was never so right as when he gave us Pogo's keen insight view left<br /> <br /> <br /> Our rights have gone unclaimed for far too long.<br /> <br /> Claim of Right <br /> <br /> DATE: _____________ <br /> <br /> I, __________(Name)________ ___, a Human Being in a Common Law jurisdiction, born in ______( ********* City)____________ on or about the ______________ day in the month of _____________ in the year _______________ to _____(mother)______________ and _____(father)___________ have the ability and power to establish rights by use of a Claim of Right. <br /> <br /> I do hereby claim that among my rights are all of the following: <br /> <br /> 1. I claim the right to an education. <br /> 2. I claim the right to use the funds either in my bond (evidenced by the bond tracking number on the Birth Certificate issued to me by the government) or to use the funds generated by the bond to either pay off any student loan if I do have one, or to pay directly for my education if I do not have a loan. <br /> 3. I claim the right to use the funds in the bond or revenue generated by those funds to pay for food and shelter and any other rights recognized by the United Nations. <br /> 4. I claim the right to fire any one acting as a fiduciary over my bond if they fail to acknowledge all rights herein claimed. <br /> 5. I claim the right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and in doing so free myself from all statutory obligations and restrictions, if doing so is, in my opinion, in my best interest. <br /> 6. I claim the right to direct my fiduciary as to what to do with the revenue generated by my bond, provided the directives are a benefit to my society and me. <br /> 7. I claim the right to order and direct my federal representatives to transfer directly to me funds and moneys which they would normally transfer to my provincial representatives in the absence of any directives, if doing so is, in my opinion, in my best interest. <br /> <br /> These Rights are hereby lawfully claimed and are established as Law thirty days hence. <br /> Any and all concerned parties wishing to discuss or dispute these claims must send a Notice of Dispute or Offer of Discussion within thirty days via Registered mail to the address below. <br /> Failure to do so means that all parties agree that these rights herein claimed are lawfully established and will not be infringed, violated or abrogated in any way. <br /> All parties who have been served proper Notice of this claim and fail to discuss or dispute, and then infringe, violate or abrogate said rights, directly or through their agents, employees or proxies, agree they do so under FULL COMMERCIAL LIABILITY and further agree to pay to me upon my demand a sum certain of One Million Canadian Dollars for every infringement, violation or abrogation. <br /> <br /> This Claim of Right is made and served with the intent of bettering my society and myself and, without ill will, malice aforethought, frivolity or vexation. <br /> <br /> Claimant: ______________________________ <br /> <br /> <br /> Notary: ________________________________ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

""A neighbour told me years ago that she was all for everyone getting Social Security Numbers. “If they<br /> can catch just one ‘dead-beat dad’, then it is worth it.” This is what she was led to believe. If you ask the<br /> wives of these ‘dead-beat dads’, you’ll discover that the pittance the feds give her, after ordering dad’s boss<br /> to garnish his wages, is taxable and she will be worse off than before, particularly if she has paid an attorney<br /> to bring dad into court in order to get the order. It is never worth it. Again, it is win/ win for the feds and lose/<br /> lose for both parents. If only parents could to sit down and negotiate, they, along with their children, would<br /> all win. Involving the state means you lose all control.<br /> Just so you know that there is a light at the end of the tunnel – and it is not the light of an oncoming train<br /> – here is an encouraging story. In her book, Energy Medicine, Donna Eden tells of having taught a class<br /> wherein one of the attendees was a judge. Imagine a judge being so enlightened as to go to a class on<br /> ‘energy medicine’!? A few months later he contacted her and related a case he had before him. A man had<br /> beaten his wife and the neighbour who had attempted to intervene. The children were aghast and everyone<br /> was stunned because this man was a true family man and good neighbour; he just went berserk one evening.<br /> The judge asked Donna Eden, “Just before I pass sentence on this fellow I wonder if this might be a case of<br /> that ‘triple-warmer’ thing we learned about in your class” – A neighbour told me years ago that she was all for everyone getting Social Security Numbers. “If they<br /> can catch just one ‘dead-beat dad’, then it is worth it.” This is what she was led to believe. If you ask the<br /> wives of these ‘dead-beat dads’, you’ll discover that the pittance the feds give her, after ordering dad’s boss<br /> to garnish his wages, is taxable and she will be worse off than before, particularly if she has paid an attorney<br /> to bring dad into court in order to get the order. It is never worth it. Again, it is win/ win for the feds and lose/<br /> lose for both parents. If only parents could to sit down and negotiate, they, along with their children, would<br /> all win. Involving the state means you lose all control.<br /> Just so you know that there is a light at the end of the tunnel – and it is not the light of an oncoming train<br /> – here is an encouraging story. In her book, Energy Medicine, Donna Eden tells of having taught a class<br /> wherein one of the attendees was a judge. Imagine a judge being so enlightened as to go to a class on<br /> ‘energy medicine’!? A few months later he contacted her and related a case he had before him. A man had<br /> beaten his wife and the neighbour who had attempted to intervene. The children were aghast and everyone<br /> was stunned because this man was a true family man and good neighbour; he just went berserk one evening.<br /> The judge asked Donna Eden, “Just before I pass sentence on this fellow I wonder if this might be a case of<br /> that ‘triple-warmer’ thing we learned about in your class” – a meridian line of energy which when blocked<br /> causes chaos. Donna thought so from the description of the man’s behaviour. The judge sentenced the man<br /> to a dozen of Donna Eden’s Energy Medicine classes. So, you see, we are making our way into the light. Is<br /> this a judge we want our fellows and/or ourselves to face? You bet!<br /> Courts<br /> kangaroo Donna thought so from the description of the man’s behaviour. The judge sentenced the man<br /> to a dozen of Donna Eden’s Energy Medicine classes. So, you see, we are making our way into the light. Is<br /> this a judge we want our fellows and/or ourselves to face? You bet!""<br /> <br /> <br /> sounds like this could be useful knowlwdge <br /> <br /> The judge asked Donna Eden, “Just before I pass sentence on this fellow I wonder if this might be a case of<br /> that ‘triple-warmer’ thing we learned about in your class” – <b>a meridian line of energy which when blocked<br /> causes chaos. </b><br /> <br /> cause i know a shit load of energy blocked people <br /> some mostly those that claim I don't make any sense<br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

here lies a concept to "get your head around"<br /> <br /> http://www.cato-unbound.org/2007/05/18/daniel-b-klein/pre-governmental-institutions-and-classical-liberal-liberty/<br /> <br /> "The main problem with the view that there are only two things, actual governmental legal rights and nonsense, is that it denies all other distinctions and categories that work to refine and advance our understanding and evaluation of rules. <b>Rules and principles emerge from sources other than government.</b>* They often exist and function apart from and even in opposition to the government rules (e.g., black markets, as Walter Block has highlighted, are often heroic, and Robert Ellickson’s classic study of ranching in Shasta County, California). Moreover, rules and principles can exist in our minds even when contravened in institutional practice. The most pervasive and important constable is the impartial spectator. In fact, she too is an institution of sorts."<br /> <br /> * bolding mine

[Diogenes]

Worthy of discussion<br /> <br /> <br /> On Presuppositions<br /> Malcolm Gladwell. Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. Little, Brown and Company: New York, 2005.<br /> <br /> D.L. Rosenhan. "On Being Sane in Insane Places." Science, vol.179, no.4070, p.250-258 (19 January 1973).<br /> <br /> In 1973, the peer-reviewed journal Science published a now-classic study in psychology. In its introduction, the study's author, D.L. Rosenhan, pointed out that the criteria for determining whether someone is mentally ill are highly subjective. The provocative question Rosenhan asked was this: Do diagnoses of mental illness come from the patient themself, or from the context in which a medical observer examines them? This study was designed to answer that question.<br /> <br /> Rosenhan recruited eight normal, healthy individuals, whom he termed "pseudopatients". Each of the pseudopatients arrived at one of a variety of mental hospitals and checked themselves in, claiming to be hearing voices saying words such as "empty", "hollow", and "thud". Other than this fictitious symptom and the use of pseudonyms, they truthfully answered every question they were asked, and once they were admitted, they immediately stopped complaining of any symptoms at all. At all times, they remained polite and cooperated with the hospital staff (medication was surreptitiously flushed down the toilet). The objective of the study was to see how long it would take for the staff to realize that they were not mentally ill and release them.<br /> <br /> The results were shocking. The pseudopatients were all released after between 7 and 52 days, with an average stay of 19 days. But more importantly, not a single one was realized to be sane by any of the doctors or nurses at any of the hospitals. Instead, they were released with diagnoses such as "schizophrenia in remission". Even more bizarrely, the other patients were more likely to recognize the pseudopatients as normal than the hospital staff. 35 out of 118 genuine patients voiced suspicions about the pseudopatients' claims of mental illness, and some told them, "You're not crazy. You're a journalist, or a professor! You're checking up on the hospital." <br /> <br /> Even seemingly obvious clues were overlooked. The pseudopatients kept notes on their experience; at first they attempted to conceal these, but soon realized there was no need. Even when the doctors observed them writing, they dismissed it as "note-taking behavior", another symptom of the presumed psychosis. When they asked ordinary questions such as, "Excuse me, doctor, can you tell me when I am likely to be discharged?", the staff frequently answered with non sequiturs such as, "Hello, Dave. How are you today?" and then moved off without waiting for a response. In interviews, the patients related their life histories truthfully, which might seem to provide evidence against a diagnosis of mental illness since they were legitimately well. However, these histories were likewise twisted, with psychiatrists interpreting and labeling every drifting apart as "ambivalence", every fight with loved ones as "outbursts of anger". There was no evidence of any conscious distortion; <b>the staff legitimately believed in the initial diagnosis, which became a lens that colored all their subsequent interpretation of the evidence. </b>1 In a sense, the fact that the pseudopatient was in a mental hospital seemed to be all that was required for the doctors and nurses to conclude that they were insane and treat them accordingly. Once a diagnosis was made, it tended to "stick", and from that moment on, the staff assumed that all behavior stemmed from that diagnosis.<br /> <br /> Rosenhan's paper spurred a variety of reforms in the mental-health industry, and it is to be hoped that the specific problems he identified have been, if not eliminated, at least lessened. But the ugly mark of presupposition has by no means been overcome, even today. This study was about conscious presuppositions, decisions made by doctors and nurses with the full consent of their faculty of reasoning. Chapter 3 of Malcolm Gladwell's 2005 book Blink discusses a different kind of presupposition - an unconscious kind - that can be brought out by a simple psychological exam known as the Implicit Association Test. Test-takers are shown a list, with two categories, and are asked to place each item onto the list in its appropriate category as quickly as possible. For example, consider this list:<br /> <br /> from http://www.daylightatheism.org/2006/02/ ... tions.html<br /> <br /> 1.I see much of this seeing through a lense bywhich subsequent <br /> stuff is judge and do it myself(i dislike that in me)

[Diogenes]

With special consideration to Milton for presenting a vide that re-afirmed a pathe to be taken <br /> Thank you Milton I am in your debt<br /> <br /> http://www.thinkfree.ca/images/letters%20to%20authorities.pdf<br /> (not a one sitting read)

[Milton]

You are welcome Dio. <br /> <br /> I am going to send the form you posted a few comments back which requests a free education in return for the bond which was issued on the occasion of my birth/registration certificate. I'm interested to see what kind of response will be forthcoming.

[Diogenes]

I purposely suspended contribution to this thread due to Milton's post.<br /> I felt and feel Milton's additons here warrented time and that decission seems to have been wise <br /> now it is time for me to continue

[Diogenes]

Topham views under attack: B¹nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings Quesnel Cariboo Observer‏ <br /> From: The Radical Press (radical@radicalpress.com) <br /> Sent: January 13, 2008 8:12:05 PM <br /> To: RADICAL PRESS (radical@radicalpress.com) <br /> <br /> Dear Radical Reader,<br /> <br /> The Quesnel Cariboo Observer has been publishing my letters, articles and personal columns for over thirty years. I owe a debt of gratitude to this courageous paper for now interviewing me on this vital issue of concern and writing an article that is sure to bring the subject of free speech (and the issue of the Palestinian people) further into the limelight. It will undoubtedly bring a lot more too but that’s par for the course.<br /> <br /> I believe this is a wonderful window through which those who feel strongly about this issue can voice their opinions<br /> <br /> If any readers are so inclined please write to the Editor at Quesnel Cariboo Observer newsroom@quesnelobserver.com and express your views on this urgent matter. Every additional idea and expression of concern about freedom of speech and the tactics of the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress needs to be brought out into the clear light of open and public debate. The more people from around the country and the world who write in the better.<br /> <br /> Thank you,<br /> <br /> Arthur Topham<br /> Pub/Ed<br /> The Radical Press<br /> radical@radicalpress.com<br /> --------------------------- <br /> <br /> http://www.bclocalnews.com/bc_cariboo/quesnelobserver/news/13717397.html<br /> <br /> Topham views under attackB’nai Brith claims anti-Jewish writings<br /> <br /> <br /> By Autumn MacDonald<br /> <br /> Quesnel Cariboo Observer <br /> <br /> <br /> January 13, 2008<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Arthur Topham, owner, publisher and editor of The Radical Press, has received a complaint from the Canadian Human Rights Commission stating he’s promoting hatred towards Jews and citizens of Israel.<br /> <br /> B.C. representative for the League of Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada Harry Abrams filed the complaint with the CHRC after articles were published by Topham on the Radical Press website, which Abrams felt were discriminatory against individuals of the Jewish faith.<br /> <br /> Topham, who has been publishing both a hard copy and online site since 1998, said he received the complaint Nov. 20, 2007.<br /> <br /> Since then, Topham has been working on a response to the commission – he sent the 13-page document to the CHRC anti-hate team investigator Sandy Kozak Jan. 3.<br /> <br /> He has not removed the articles in question from his website.<br /> <br /> “Harry Abrams and his partner in this complaint, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada are exploiting and abusing the intent of the Canadian Human Rights Act for their own narrow, partisan, ideological purposes,” Topham said Wednesday.<br /> <br /> “They are not designed to promote and ensure the freedom of expression that the vast majority of Canadians demand and expect but rather are meant to buttress and support the political aims of a foreign state (Israel) of which these organizations are but political extensions.”<br /> <br /> Topham further explained it’s his criticism of Zionism and Zionist policies that have the CHRC worried.<br /> <br /> “They don’t want the people of Canada knowing what’s going on in Israel,” he said.<br /> <br /> Topham stated there’s been an increase in these types of complaints to the CHRC by both the B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress since Sept. 11, 2001.<br /> <br /> In the aftermath of 9/11 Canada brought in its new Anti-terrorism Act, c.41 on Dec. 18, 2001 and along with it came changes to Sec. 13 (1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act which specifically deals with “hate messages.”<br /> <br /> It is Topham’s contention that both the B’nai Brith and the CJC played a significant role in defining the new interpretation of Sec. 13 (1) – one that he feels now allows both of these partisan groups to lay hate crimes complaints against any Internet user or website owner who criticizes Israel’s Zionist ideology and its racist policies toward the Palestinian people.<br /> <br /> And it’s Topham’s belief that charges are designed to silence debate on issues vital to both national and global peace.<br /> <br /> “If we cannot express our thoughts and ideas openly and freely,” he said, “then the democratic principles upon which Canada was founded become meaningless and dead and we might as well accept the fact that we are living in a communist dictatorship rather than a true democracy”.<br /> <br /> For now, Topham waits to hear back from the CHRC, but he’s pretty sure he already knows their answer.<br /> <br /> “My response won’t make any difference,” he said. “It doesn’t matter whether I’m writing the truth.”<br /> <br /> Topham explained the CHRC will present his response and Abram’s complaint to a tribunal who will review the evidence. A decision will then be made.<br /> <br /> In the past, writers have been ordered to remove the articles in questions, or take their site down. Some have resisted – this has resulted in jail time.<br /> <br /> “The irony of it is,” Topham said, “the person I love most in the world, my wife of 30 years, is Jewish.”<br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.ph ... t296003756<br /> <br /> <br /> Gandhi's grandson blasts Israel, Jews [ Post 296003756 ]<br /> <br /> A portion of one response<br /> <br /> " Arun Gandhi calls out "warning, warning" to jews (and he is correct, friends are being repulsed from the jews). jews don't hear "warning, warning", instead they hear "threat, threat" and label Gandhi, of course, as an anti-semite."<br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

Dear Radical Reader,<br /> <br /> I received the following letter from Mr. Alexander Romanchuk dated January 5, 2008. Mr. Romanchuk is a retired lawyer from Edmonton, Alberta. His words are worthy of consideration with respect to the times we are living in.<br /> <br /> Please pass this along to your friends and associates.<br /> <br /> Arthur Topham<br /> Pub/Ed<br /> The Radical Press<br /> Canada’s Radical News Network<br /> radical@radicalpress.com<br /> http://www.radicalpress.com<br /> “Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”<br /> ------------------------------------------------------------<br /> January 5, 2008<br /> Edmonton, Alberta<br /> <br /> Mr. Topham,<br /> <br /> "I don't know where to start, Mr. Topham. Your submission to the CHRC concerning the frivolous and vexatious charges against you by Abrams and his ilk almost brought me to tears. Now I am incensed and extremely mad and disgusted and I want to help you. I only wish I were 25 years younger so that I could defend you. My cheque payable to you for $100.00 is enclosed. I hope it will help in some way.<br /> <br /> I was born 711/2 years ago in Edmonton, had my public schooling here and then went to the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, for my post graduate degrees in Arts and in Law. They were the BEST five years of my life; I had the finest professors and went to classes with some of the finest Saskatchewanites in the world. I graduated in 1963 and now I am retired, but I CEASE to be retired from life, from persevering, from writing, from criticizing and from asking questions. Why am I so grateful for those years at the U of S? Because my professors taught me to THINK RATIONALLY (even though I tend to be an emotional person), they taught me debating skills and to critically examine issues from many perspectives. I already knew how to criticize constructively and how to advance positive arguments and theses; they simply reinforced them for me. And I will forever be grateful to those years at my alma mater.<br /> <br /> The Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. said, before his untimely death:<br /> <br /> "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent<br /> about things that matter."<br /> <br /> I have never seen things as bad as they are now in Canada and, indeed, in the USA and elsewhere on this insane planet. Not only have we become complacent, apathetic and silent we have become silenced by sinister forces working surreptitiously to bring about our virtual downfall, to silence us from speaking out and speaking the truth about matters that concern all of us. We have become afraid of our shadows. We cannot speak out against iniquities for FEAR that the CHRC and their provincial counterparts will swoop down upon us, dig their talons into us and silence us forever. These commissions wield more power than our elected representatives. IN MY HUMBLE OPINION ALL OF THESE INIQUITOUS COMMISSIONS SHOULD BE ABOLISHED FORTHWITH!<br /> <br /> The worst part about all of this nonsense is that even my friends and colleagues will not openly discuss these matters with me because of fear that the "walls have ears." Those that will I can count on two fingers. Otherwise, if they don't walk away they simply say that we don't want to discuss it - a form of burying your head in the sand. And that infuriates me! But you know the old expression: "You can lead a horse to water but...."<br /> <br /> I see now that even Zundel's young German female lawyer is being raked over the coals in Germany because she defended him at his trial. She stands to lose her license as a lawyer and this is a crying, bloody shame.<br /> <br /> John Bryant offered these words many years ago:<br /> <br /> "The reason men are silenced is not because<br /> they speak falsely, but because they speak<br /> the truth. This is because if men speak falsehoods,<br /> their own words can be used against them; while<br /> if they speak truly, there is nothing which can<br /> be used against them - except force."<br /> <br /> For years now I have been reading about how Abrams and his cohorts have silenced people by bringing forth unproven allegations of hate to the CHRC. I have seen, as you so succinctly pointed out, how the CHRC convicted every Respondent and how that Commission uses its office to spy surreptitiously on an unwary public. Our inalienable right to speak the truth, offer opinions and observations are being eroded inch by inch not only by these Commissions but through the complicity of people like Abrams. You have done much more research into these matters than I, but from what I have read and observed you ARE telling the truth and as Voltaire once said: "I MAY DISAGREE WITH WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY, BUT I WILL DEFEND TO THE DEATH YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT." And at this point, Mr. Topham, I am one of your defenders and will assist you in any way possible!<br /> <br /> This nation is no longer a democracy where the will of the majority prevails, but a dictatorship by the unconscionable will of the MINORITIES! It was just last year that the Muslims in Ontario tried, unsuccessfully, to have Sharia law form part of the laws of our land. I thanked the legislature of Ontario for denying this outrageous request. We have had to BOW to the minorities for many years and I blame this all on Trudeau and his cronies but, more importantly, <b>I blame the Canadian public generally for allowing this to happen. </b>* At one time, Mr. Topham, on a scale of 1 to 10, I was an 8 on being a relatively proud Canadian. Today I am an Albertan (who also happens to be a Separatist) and about a -1 on being a Canadian. There is no more mettle in Canadians any longer, but you have certainly shown it and you are worthy of being supported. I wonder if I should weep for Canada?<br /> <br /> "Mourn not the dead that in the cool earth lie -<br /> But rather mourn the apathetic throng -<br /> The cowed and the meek -<br /> Who see the world's greatest anguish and its wrong<br /> And dare not speak."<br /> RALPH CHAPLIN<br /> 1887-1961<br /> <br /> Please keep me informed and do NOT relent for I will stand beside you!<br /> <br /> Yours truly,<br /> <br /> AL ROMANCHUK<br /> <br /> <br /> *Bolding mine<br /> <br /> I have asserted the very same seniment only to be "corrected by some.... well thats best left unsaid, however when we remain silent we give consent, a consent the children of today will curse us for <br /> Dio

[Diogenes]

Is this what is wanted to be supressed by the CJC ADL and JDL?<br /> <br /> http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10769 <br /> <br /> snip<br /> ISRAELI PRIOR KNOWLEDGE<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> While the evidence is clearly indicative of Israeli prior knowledge, commonly-held misconceptions about Israel and ignorance of Zionism's brutal history of terrorism prevent most people from comprehending the Israeli connection with 9-11. The ignorance of Zionist history, cultivated by the controlled media, prevents people from understanding the present reality. <br /> <br /> In order to understand 9-11, it is essential to have a grasp of the history of previous Israeli attacks on the United States. This chapter examines a few little-known, but key events in the history of Israeli false-flag terror attacks and the Zionist planners behind them. The names and events discussed in this chapter are at the center of Zionist terrorism, false-flag and otherwise. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> "False-flag" terrorism means an act of terror planned and perpetrated by one party for the purpose of having the blame assigned to its enemy for political or strategic purposes. 9-11, like many other major terror attacks and those which have plagued occupied-Iraq for years, are textbook false-flag operations. False-flag attacks are designed to foment hostility or instigate war between groups or nations.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Only very rarely has the United States, oceans away from the conflicts of Europe and Asia, actually been attacked by foreign militaries. The British invasion during the War of 1812 and the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941 are the only two foreign attacks, prior to 9-11, that come to mind. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Although 9-11 is disguised and interpreted by the government and media as an act of Arab terrorism, the evidence indicates that it was a carefully planned false-flag attack carried out by the Israeli military after years of planning and preparation.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> EVIDENCE OF ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> This is not a hypothesis that can be easily dismissed as based on mere speculation or prejudice. There is solid evidence that Israeli intelligence agencies had prior knowledge of 9-11, which is indicative of involvement in the attacks. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Public statements made by key terror suspects, the five jubilant "movers," for example, who were actually Israeli intelligence agents, indicate that they possessed prior knowledge of the attacks. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In November 2001, after being released from two months in U.S. custody, three of the five agents appeared on Israeli television and admitted, in plain Hebrew, that their purpose had been to document the event. The Israeli interviewer did not ask the men who had sent them, but it is quite clear they were working for an agency of the State of Israel.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> After being released in November 2001, three of the five Mossad operatives appeared on Israeli television and openly admitted that their "purpose had been to document the event."<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The five fake movers from Urban Moving Systems of Weehawken, New Jersey, were actually operatives of the Israeli secret services. The five Israeli agents, described in early news reports as "Middle Eastern," had been sought by the FBI and New Jersey authorities after they were observed celebrating and photographing the destruction of the World Trade Center. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The Israelis made a video of themselves with the burning towers behind them as they flicked their cigarette lighters, laughed, and celebrated as hundreds of innocent people were being roasted alive. Reportedly, they had worn Palestinian or Arab garb, which was later found in their van. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Two of the five Israelis, who were caught with multiple passports, box cutters, thousands of dollars stuffed into their socks, and driving a van that tested positive for explosives, were actually on a list of foreign agents known to U.S. law enforcement authorities at the time.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ABC News did a follow up on the Israeli agents in June 2002:<br /> <br /> The arresting officers said they saw a lot that aroused their suspicion about the men. One of the passengers had $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock. Another was carrying two foreign passports. A box cutter was found in the van. But perhaps the biggest surprise for the officers came when the five men identified themselves as Israeli citizens.<br /> <br /> ‘We Are Not Your Problem’<br /> <br /> According to the police report, one of the passengers told the officers they had been on the West Side Highway in Manhattan "during the incident" — referring to the World Trade Center attack. The driver of the van, Sivan Kurzberg, told the officers, "We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem." The other passengers were his brother Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner and Omer Marmari.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The five "movers" were evidently part of a much larger Israeli terror operation in New York City. The Urban Moving Systems company was later exposed as a Mossad "front" company, a fake agency set up to facilitate their terror operation. An American who worked with the company said he was shocked to see that the Israeli employees had openly rejoiced over the attacks.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In November 2001, the five Israeli agents and terror suspects were returned to Israel on "visa violations" although they had repeatedly refused to take, and then failed lie detector tests about their involvement in 9-11. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Instant messages warning of the attack at the WTC, precise to the minute, sent via the Mossad-owned Odigo messaging system hours before the first plane hit the North Tower, are further evidence that members of Israeli intelligence agencies had very specific and accurate knowledge of the terror attacks – long before they occurred.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> In a complex and elaborately planned crime of mass murder and terrorism like 9-11, possession of specific prior knowledge like that held by the fake Israeli movers and the senders of the Odigo messages is clearly evidence of involvement in the crime. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Had the recipients of the Odigo warnings contacted the responsible authorities in New York, thousands of lives would have been saved. If these people were not complicit in the crime, why didn't they contact the authorities? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Taking the evidence of Israeli prior knowledge into consideration with the Israeli military's capability to launch such a sophisticated false-flag terror attack, the obvious question has to be asked: Would Israeli military agencies commit such an atrocious act of terrorism in the United States in order to achieve a strategic goal?<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The question whether Israeli strategic planners would conduct a false-flag terror attack against the United States, their most powerful ally, in order to fix the blame on the Arabs, their enemies, raises several specific questions:<br /> <br /> 1. Has the Israeli military conducted false-flag terror attacks against the United States in the past?<br /> <br /> 2. If so, are there links between the people or agencies involved in the previous terror attacks and 9-11?<br /> <br /> 3. Is there a strategic goal for which Zionist planners would conduct such an extremely dangerous and sophisticated terrorist operation?<br /> <br /> 4. If so, has that strategic goal been realized as a result of 9-11?<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The answer to all four questions is yes. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The Israeli military has a documented history of conducting military and false-flag terror attacks against the United States. It also has a history of withholding information from the United States about threats it is aware of. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Specific Zionist extremists are, furthermore, the prime suspects with the strongest motive for having carried out 9-11. The Zionist motive was to kick-start their long-planned U.S.-led "War on Terror" with a spectacular terror attack against the United States.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Like any other crime, solving 9-11 requires that we diligently investigate those suspects with strong motives and prior histories of committing similar crimes. There are a number of senior Israeli suspects who fit this description. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> On the other hand, there is no reasonable Arab motive to attack the World Trade Center or Pentagon. Why would Arabs or Moslems commit such a counter-productive act? Why would any Arab organization commit a senseless crime knowing that it would invite a U.S. military invasion of their nation or another Islamic nation? The Arab/Islamic terror scenario makes very little sense.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ISRAEL'S HISTORY OF TERROR<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> On the other hand, senior officials of the Israeli government, the Mossad, and Israeli military intelligence, an organization known as "Aman," have a long history of carrying out false-flag terror attacks against the United States and Britain, at least as far back as the bombing of Jerusalem's King David Hotel on July 22, 1946.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> The bombing of the luxury hotel was ordered by Menachem Begin, the head of the Irgun, an active Zionist terrorist organization during the 1930s and 40s. Begin later became prime minister of Israel, a position he held during the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, which was led by Ariel Sharon, then minister of defense.<br /> <br /> Snip<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

from my mailbox<br /> <br /> <br /> Control of your mind<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> "Western society is controlled by the Jews with music, TV, houses, cars, [and] free sex"<br /> — David Hicks,<br /> an Australian idealist arrested in Afghanistan<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> By John Kaminski<br /> skylax@comcast.net<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> I don't trust religious fanatics.<br /> <br /> AFAIK, they're blind to reason, and can't be trusted to see clearly on that account.<br /> <br /> Plus, most of them are phonies. You see the freaks on TV: Hagee saying Israel is more important than Christ. Twisting the minds of dullard evangelicals into an army for Israel, intent on killing the ragheads. Contemplate when the Pentagon changes that programming and you are classified as the new raghead. <br /> <br /> In case you haven't noticed, this has already occurred, Raggie!<br /> <br /> As people we have been turned into numbers. The very essence of our lives has been wrung out of us, classified and categorized. And the human quintessence — the very thing that makes life worth living — lies dead in the dust of a radioactive Iraqi roadway, or poisoned on the floor of an upscale American cancer clinic.<br /> <br /> I hear some preachers speak to that, but hardly anybody's listening. It turns out the most infuriating aspect about 9/11 was that there was plenty of evidence the whole deal was orchestrated through the White House, which is run by Jewish advisers and the most powerful banks in London. <br /> <br /> But the people's level of attention has become so fragmented, so splintered into occupational trivia and entertainment anesthesia — like football, the purpose of which is described in the Protocols of Zion — that the cognitive dissonance — the preprogrammed daily distractions of life — have become the real screen by which these traitors to humanity (so prominently featured on American Jewish television) blew up the symbolic heart of their own country in order to press profitable warfare around the world in perpetuity. <br /> <br /> And in their terror (which was created in Washington), everybody believed their lies.<br /> <br /> Now these same goons are asking us to vote for them.<br /> <br /> The whole thing about religion is a screen. It's really about money. And this is where these two roads intertwine.<br /> <br /> America is on the skids, you may have noticed. It's been a deliberate policy, engineered by the Jewish banking faction that has controlled most of the finances of Western civilization since the 1770s (although Jewish control of Great Britain, through predatory lending goes back at least another century before that).<br /> <br /> That Jewish bankers have engineered ALL the wars since that time is, in today's Judaized society, generally classified as an anti-Semitic slur. We non-Jews are subject now to almost automatic imprisonment for merely talking about Jews. <br /> <br /> But the fact remains it is a fact, provable, well-documented and available to those who seek, and are not completely comatose from the multilevel Freud/Marx/Einstein indoctrination which has created a permanent cultural slavery for non-Jews. Jewish bankers based in Europe and New York have engineered ALL the wars since that time — the American Civil War, both World Wars, and all the wars since. <br /> <br /> Can you count them all? They all have the same genesis. And purpose. To make money the fastest way possible. This policy is consuming the Earth. Israel is clear evidence of this, of what the world will look like if we continue on this course.<br /> <br /> This madness of profit, sanctified by the bought-off religions, is about to kill us all. And for all the world, the best way to identify this cancer that threatens all life on this planet is to scrutinize Jewish intentions.<br /> <br /> The Talmud desperately needs to be subjected to the very strictures it has imposed on others through these new hate laws. It's like the deal with Israel. Only rights for Jews, all the others are slaves. This is what the entire Jewish community of every country on Earth seeks to impose ... EVERYWHERE.<br /> <br /> It's very important that you understand this. Because all else depends on it.<br /> <br /> As the late and lamented Stojgniev O'Donnell averred: Everything depends on answering the Jewish question. Otherwise, nothing will be solved.<br /> <br /> But things are looking dark that it will ever happen. <br /> <br /> In Germany, a lawyer is on trial for defending her client against Jewish mind control lies. The court says she committed a crime by even talking about the alleged crimes her client, Ernst Zündel, supposedly committed.<br /> <br /> The lawyer Sylvia Stolz, asks: “Is it even possible to indict a defense attorney for taking his or her professional obligation seriously and doing everything possible to meet those obligations? If the answer to the question is ‘yes’ then the answer is further proof of Talmudic supremacy in Germany. However, it is obvious to all that such tyranny can no longer be called ‘justice.’”<br /> <br /> In Canada, a publisher (with a Jewish wife, even) is assailed by Jewish attack dogs. He has said something to offend Jews and is therefore criminally liable. Also in Canada, another writer named Makow who pretends to be a critic of the Jews never draws any criticism from Jews. Why is that? <br /> <br /> In the United States, votes disappear on the electronic scoreboard for presidential candidates not pleasing to Jews. Jewish TV networks ban certain candidates who are not pleasing to them, and then — unthinkably — the candidate upon whose candidacy the last fleeting hopes of freedom ride doesn’t even complain about it.<br /> <br /> In the Persian Gulf, the U.S. government tells tales about tiny Iranian boats threatening American aircraft carriers who are there doing the work of the Jews. The captain of this fascist flotilla says the incident was no big deal, but the U.S. president – while visiting his real-life masters in Israel — says the event was very close to being an act of war.<br /> <br /> It is a 360-degree encirclement of human activity by one small but insane group which happens to control all of the world’s money.<br /> <br /> One final example ...<br /> <br /> Recently I had the misfortune of attending a Catholic mass in Sarasota, Florida (Church of the Incarnation on Bee Ridge Road, one of those “hip” Catholic churches). Don’t ask me why I went. It’s too long and sad a story.<br /> <br /> As we sat in a pew a few rows behind a finely dressed transvestite and a gay piano player, the red-nosed priest in the pulpit told the biblical story of Joshua, and how we should all rejoice at the splendor of his ceaseless killing of the Amalek.<br /> <br /> I immediately noticed that he was not calling the characters of the Bible story “Israelites,” as they should be called. Instead, he was calling them “Israelis.”<br /> <br /> I leaned over and asked my companion if she knew who the Amalek, the victims of Joshua’s incessant mass murder, actually were. She shook her head.<br /> <br /> I informed her that the Amalek were today’s Palestinians, and that the priest was glorifying their murder by Joshua and the “Israelis.” Amalek is a term for all non-Jews, I told her. “We are the Amalek,” I added.<br /> <br /> Right about then, I got up and walked out in disgust. My companion followed a few moments later. She collared an off-duty priest on the way out, and asked him why his church was preaching such horrid, pro-war garbage. He replied that the diocese decreed what the priests got to say, and they would be fired if they deviated from this order.<br /> <br /> My final thought, as I strode past this devout congregation, was that all these Catholics, heads bowed in religious respect to a doctrine that had been totally twisted by Jewish influence, were all praying for their own murder.<br /> <br /> Do you understand? Since Amalek is a Jewish term for all non-Jews, and the priest was glorifying the mass murder of the Amalek by the biblical Joshua, all these pious Catholics were actually praying for their own murder.<br /> <br /> Do you really understand?<br />

[Diogenes]

Think of this as a public service announcement <br /> <br /> <br /> http://www.nlpweekly.com/?p=951&page=3 <br /> <br /> Don’t You Tell Me I Mismatch!<br /> <br /> The key metaprogram/strategy variables in a person being diagnosed as<br /> Borderline Personality Disordered include: <br /> <br /> 1. Sort by self. The person is convinced that everything<br /> happening is happening for them. This leads at times to paranoia ("Why did you<br /> say that? What are you trying to tell me."). At other times it leads to<br /> interpersonal conflict ("You knew I didn’t want you to do that. Why did you do<br /> it?"). The person is not fully separating out first and second position, to use<br /> one NLP description. In communication theory terms (Bolstad and Hamblett, 1998,<br /> p 73-77) they have confused problem ownership, and in traditional psychotherapy<br /> terms, they have "diffuse boundaries". <br /> <br /> 2. Mismatching. The person sorts compulsively for what they<br /> disagree with, and what doesn’t fit. Generally, this means they are continuously<br /> aware of how life doesn’t live up to the ideal. In therapeutic relationships<br /> this results in them identifying even very small differences between what a<br /> therapist said and did ("You said you’d tell me the truth; how come you never<br /> mentioned before that you…"). Much of the person’s auditory digital processing<br /> is taken up with mismatching themselves (telling themselves off). Originally in<br /> their early life, mismatching was an important skill that protected them from<br /> being totally overwhelmed by powerful others. Now, it has become an<br /> uncontrollable reflex response to almost every event. Let’s be clear that<br /> sorting for differences (mismatching) by itself is not a problem. On the<br /> contrary, it is a useful skill, and the source of creativity. The problem is<br /> when any metaprogram becomes compulsive. <br /> <br /> 3. Chunking Across. Part of the process of compulsive mismatching<br /> involves what is called in cognitive psychology "transductive reasoning" (Layden<br /> et alis, 1993, p 38). As the person leaps from one state to another, and one<br /> opinion to another, they fail to chunk up and identify general principles behind<br /> these separate events. There is a lack of meta-analysis, and, to use Meta-State<br /> terminology, an absence of meta-states such as a strong sense of self (Hall,<br /> 1996) <br /> <br /> <b>4. Either-Or Thinking. Another result of compulsive mismatching<br /> and polarity based thinking is to perceive things as either perfect or ruined.<br /> ("My haircut was a disaster today. I’m going to kill myself."). This is<br /> connected to chunking across, because the person has no chunked up category to<br /> experience the specific event as "a part of". In the example, the haircut is all<br /> there is. There’s no "self" above and beyond the events of the moment, so that<br /> the bad haircut is the only evidence of self to measure success by. In the<br /> person’s strategies to check "Am I loveable" or "Am I competent", at the Test<br /> phase only the immediate evidence is assessed. The danger in relation to other<br /> people is that one "mistake" can provide enough evidence to the person with BPD<br /> that their very life is threatened by this other human being. </b><br /> <br /> Dio's note. I see a lot of eirther/or on Vive <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'> <br /> <br /> <br /> 5. Present Temporal Focus. The previous example demonstrates how<br /> the person assesses most decisions by reference only to the present moment. ("Do<br /> I want to use this heroin? Why not? It’ll stop the pain right now!"). They<br /> respond based on the principle "Out of sight; out of mind". In developmental<br /> terms, this is described as "lack of object permanence". The same process often<br /> creates anxiety about relationships, because as soon as the other person in the<br /> relationship leaves the room, the person with BPD feels abandoned. It also<br /> results in the person having what NLP calls a Consistent Convincer strategy,<br /> where they never feel fully convinced by what they have experienced previously.<br /> In traditional therapy this would be called a "lack of trust". <br /> <br /> 6. Away From Motivation. Many decisions, such as decisions to<br /> commit suicide or use drugs, are a result of moving away from pain without any<br /> evaluation of what the person actually wants instead. <br /> <br /> 7. Sequential Incongruity. The combination of the above<br /> metaprograms makes it more difficult for the person to hold in their mind two<br /> differing responses (eg being annoyed at what someone did, at the same time as<br /> loving them). Such polarities are experienced sequentially, each one mismatching<br /> and moving away from the previous response. The person frequently feels split<br /> off from ("positive" or "negative") parts of their own experience. <br /> <br />