[Diogenes]

once again mythology trups truth and the conspiracy presists<br /> <br /> http://www.traceit.com/magna.htm<br /> The <br /> Magna Carta <br /> If we take a more objective view of popular history we might achieve a very different picture of the reason for the signing of the Magna Carta.<br /> <br /> For instance, who, could answer the following: <br /> <br /> Which Prince of France, invaded Britain with his great army, and was crowned King of England in London? <br /> <br /> No, not Duke William of Normandy. Nor is it a trick question. It happened, and he was King for almost a year and isn't even mentioned in the Roll Call of English kings. <br /> <br /> While you ponder that, here's another example of slanted history. Let's take a look at, some say, the fiendish Prince John, the lovely Maid Marion, the equally beautiful Robin Hood, and, not forgetting, of course, the dastardly Sheriff of Nottingham (boo, hiss, etc) and the dawn of enlightenment and freedom represented by the Magna Carta. Never was a buckler more swashed in days of yore. <br /> <br /> The Magna Carta is a fact, it really does exist, several of them. One now rests in the archives of Lincoln Cathedral, and in Salisbury, and other places. The history of the evolution of the Magna Carta in AngloNorman England has been shrouded by romance but it is often referred with sufficient vagueness as a sort of " statement of human rights", "freedom", "liberties" and "equality" document, or a constitutional forerunner, representative of the freedom from oppression of the 'the common people'. The U.S constitution may be termed to have been created by a revolution from oppression and in some ways modelled after the Magna Carta. But the ancient Magna Carta may have been a conspiracy to conquer from within, promoted from outside the country. <br /> <br /> Let's take a quick realistic peek at the way things may have been in a world less tinctured with rose colored glasses. <br /> <br /> Many sites on the Web will give you the admirable content of the Magna Carta. Click on to Alta Vista at "Magna Carta" when you have time. Lot's of time. But read this first. <br /> <br /> Now the reality. History did not treat King John well. Whichever way we relate to it now, the Magna Carta was born of a complex revolution, probably resulting from a well planned and massive French/Scottish invasion of England, which had many different interests at its essence, religious power, royal prerogatives, national and international greed, upper class avarice, avoidance of tax and obligations, and many other vicissitudes of powerful men. The needs of the common folk, mostly the still landless AngloSaxon, were way down the list, may never have appeared, even in fine print. And anyway, the persecution of the 'common folk' or peasantry was more on the backs of the rebellious Norman Barons who were their liege lords, rather than personally by King John, or John Lackland, as he was known. <br /> <br /> The episode started with Richard the Lion Heart (he couldn't have been known as Richard 1st because nobody knew whether there'd be another Richard). Richard sold the three northern counties of England to the King of Scotland for 10,000 crowns and took off to the Crusades, a good investment at the time, as the Knights Templar later proved. He, in his own time, was a bit of a rake. He had departed the scene, thereby diminishing royal power and reducing his responsibilities in light of total baronial unrest and an almost bankrupt country. Nominally he was still King but most historians agree he would not have been a suitable candidate as a King of England for a variety of reasons. But he was rightful heir to the throne, being his father's first born. Fortunately, most of his reign after his corontation was in abstentia, for one reason or another. <br /> <br /> Richard had a young nephew and presumed heir, Arthur. He also had a younger brother, Prince John, eventually to be King John. Both were rapscallion sons of Henry II. John was the same despotic Prince John who was character assassinated, along with the Sheriff of Nottingham, and gave us the legendary 'Robin Hood', an Oscar winning movie, and its many remakes. Robin, incidentally, started the whole concept of taxation in general, and it, somehow, got all tangled up with the wonderfulness of the Magna Carta, democracy, motherhood and apple pie. Robin's socialist theme of taking from the rich or taxable and giving to the poor, noble though it was, somehow backfired on us. Now we're all taxed. Hand me the Kleenex, Lizzie<br /> <br /> edited 5:55 PST to include><br /> <br /> Ah freakin’ HA!<br /> I now have before me that which I was told of several years before.<br /> <br /> It all ties in to the courts of British Common Law we have in Canada and the yanks have in the USA.<br /> The conspiracy of the Magna Carta and law as we know it had its beginnings in Conspiracy<br /> <br /> No wonder justice is looked upon as a crap shoot and the house (Inns) rule <br /> <br /> <br /> http://www.venables.co.uk/barinns.htm <br /> <br /> http://www.innertemplelibrary.org.uk/temple-history/inner-temple-history-constitution-of-the-inn.htm<br /> <br /> <br /> http://www.online-law.co.uk/solicitor/wig_pen/tours/legal_tour.html<br /> <br /> 1. THE ROYAL COURTS OF JUSTICE <br /> A magnificent building commissioned by Parliament to house the Civil Courts and Courts of Appeal. An opportunity to walk the corridors of justice and listen to the Courts in action. Why do the Judges and Barristers wear the Robes they do? Why the formalities? <br /> Your guide will lead you around the building and the Courts and explain the system introducing you to a Court hearing on the day of your visit, the origins of which stem from Magna Carta AD 1215. <br /> <br /> 1. THE INNS OF COURT <br /> Your tour takes you into the Honourable Societies of Inner Temple and Middle Temple being part of the richest cultural legacies given to generations of Englishmen. These two Inns of Court trace their origins to the Order of the Knights Templar founded in 1118 and established in Holborn in 1128, moving to the present site in 1161. <br /> The Knights Templar were largely responsible for laying the foundations of British Law and Justice as we know it today<br /> <br /> <br /> added 6:00 pm PST<br /> <br /> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Charter#Canada<br />

[Diogenes]

Related to ^<br /> <br /> <br /> PDF] What You Didn't Know About Taxes & The 'Crown' February 17, 2005File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML<br /> the Lord Mayor at Temple (Templar) Bar where she requests permission to enter ... English common law). The Bill of Rights is viewed by the Crown as a 'bill ...<br /> www.natural-person.ca/pdf/What_you_didnt_know_about_taxes_and_the_crown.pdf <br />

[Dr Caleb]

I just had to post this one here - it's just so blatant that I can't help myself.<br /> <br /> "Industry Canada's recent wireless-spectrum auction regime, which involves a form of nationalization of telephone-cable assets, <b>has its roots in the idea that the people rule</b>.<br /> <br /> From the <a href='http://www.financialpost.com/analysis/story.html?id=fa6284fc-5917-4149-b3de-e28963aeb1ec&k=44073&p=1'>Financial Post</a>:<br />

[Diogenes]

<b> "..has its roots in the idea that the people rule."</b><br /> Well then, we can't be having any of that then, can we.

[Diogenes]

One of the things I wonder about, the suffix -ish<br /> <br /> <br /> -ish (LIKE) Show phonetics<br /> suffix<br /> used to form adjectives which say what a person, thing or action is like:<br /> foolish<br /> childish<br /> <br /> So...<br /> When ish is tagged on the end of words the meaning is changed to like or similar to the word precedding the suffix.<br /> <br /> Engl-ish = like an Engle <br /> Ir-ish = like an Ir<br /> and so on,<br /> but here is where it gets tricky <br /> <br /> What is "correct"? Jew-ish: Like a Jew?<br /> <br /> I can't see that usage beeing either acceptable, or correct.... politically or other wise<br /> <br /> There is much controversy between what is said and what is heard to be said

[Diogenes]

"Some people's idea of free speech is that they are free to say anything they like, but if anyone says anything back, that is an outrage."<br /> <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'> --Winston Churchill

[Diogenes]

Here's a pip<br /> <br /> Knowing the law <br /> People do not have to be experts in the law. However, in our system, ignorance of the law is no excuse or defence. If you are charged with an offence, for example, you cannot be excused by claiming that you did not know you were breaking the law (although the court will consider honest mistakes of fact). Because our laws are publicly debated before being passed in Parliament or a legislature, the public is expected to know what is permitted or legal and what is not. <br /> <br /> The duty to know the law means that citizens should take steps to be sure they are acting legally. Information is available from federal, provincial and territorial government offices, public libraries, public legal education and information associations, and the police. If, after consulting these sources of information, you are still uncertain about the law, then you should consult a lawyer. <br /> <br /> http://victimsweek.gc.ca/en/dept/pub/just/09.html<br /> <br /> <br /> and as I've said already in order to <i>know</i> the lawone must have undound access to law ibararies housed in court houses so check this out <br /> <br /> http://www.neoslibraries.ca/node/76<br /> <br /> About the Library <br /> <br /> <b>The Justice Canada offices and law library are in a secured area that is is not open to the public.</b> Though the Law Library is a closed stack collection, all items in The NEOS Libraries' Catalogue may be borrowed if available. Users are advised to phone (rather than coming to the Department) to find out if the material is available for borrowing. Law Library staff are prepared to retrieve requested items from the shelf for lending, photocopying, package materials, and mail, otherwise make available for pick up at our reception and/or utilize the document delivery van service among participating NEOS libraries. <br /> <br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/cur/socstu ... 9-2-3b.pdf<br /> <br /> <br /> Justice, Law, and the Just Society<br /> 9.2.3<br /> b<br /> Read the following quotations. In groups, reflect on the quotations and<br /> discuss your vision of a “just” society.<br /> “The Just Society will be one in which all of our people will have the means and the<br /> motivation to participate. The Just Society will be one in which personal and<br /> political freedom will be more securely ensured than it has ever been in the past.<br /> The Just Society will be one in which the rights of minorities will be safe from the<br /> whims of intolerant majorities. The Just Society will be one in which those regions<br /> and groups which have not fully shared in the country’s affluence will be given a<br /> better opportunity. The Just Society will be one where such urban problems as<br /> housing and pollution will be attacked through the application of new knowledge and<br /> new techniques. The Just Society will be one in which our Indian and Inuit<br /> populations will be encouraged to assume the full rights of citizenship through<br /> policies which will give them both greater responsibility for their own future and<br /> more meaningful equality of opportunity. The Just Society will be a united Canada,<br /> united because all of its citizens will be actively involved in the development of a<br /> country where equality of opportunity is ensured and individuals are permitted to<br /> fulfill themselves in the fashion they judge best.”<br /> ~ Pierre Elliott Trudeau, former Prime Minister, Official Statement by the Prime Minister, “The Just<br /> Society”, June 10, 1968<br /> “We are creating the kind of society where the criminal is out of jail before his<br /> victim is out of hospital.” ~ Richard J. Needham, Canadian writer and humourist<br /> “Law is not justice and a trial is not a scientific inquiry into truth. A trial is the<br /> resolution of a dispute.” ~ Edson Haines, former judge of the Supreme Court of Ontario<br /> “Canada’s legal profession is dominated by rich, old, sexist, white men who<br /> discriminate against women and ethnic minorities.” ~ Conclusion of a<br /> Task Force headed by former Supreme Court Justice Bertha Wilson (1994),<br /> Touchstones for Change: Equality, Diversity and Accountability.<br /> “Due process of law is a very fine shrine, and it is nice to know<br /> that there is a piece of parchment somewhere that says we are<br /> equal before the courts; but for a great many Canadians, the<br /> fine-flowing phrases of the Bill of Rights are not worth the paper<br /> they are written on.” ~ Walter Stewart "But Not in Canada"<br /> (page 1 of 2)<br /> Justice, Law, and the Just Society<br /> 9.2.3<br /> b<br /> “It is often thought that the police represent the law. It would be more accurate<br /> to say that they represent the force behind the law.” ~ J. Ricker and J. Saywell "How<br /> Are We Governed?"<br /> “Four things belong to a judge:<br /> to hear courteously,<br /> to answer wisely,<br /> to consider soberly, and<br /> to decide impartially.”<br /> ~ Socrates, Greek philosopher,<br /> 469-399 BCE<br /> “A strong and independent judiciary guarantees<br /> that governments act in accordance with our Constitution. Judges give effect to<br /> our laws and give meaning to our rights and duties as Canadians. Courts offer a<br /> venue for the peaceful resolution of disputes, and for the reasoned and<br /> dispassionate discussion of our most pressing social issues. Every judge in Canada is<br /> committed to performing this important role skillfully and impartially. Canadians<br /> should expect no less.” ~ Right Honorable Chief Justice of Canada, Beverly MacLachlan (2004):<br /> <br /> “Court services in Aboriginal communities are limited and occasional, beset by delay<br /> and misunderstanding. Aboriginal relations with police forces in all parts of the<br /> province are marked by mutual suspicion. Aboriginal criticism of the justice system<br /> generally has been harsh and pervasive. The need for change was becoming<br /> increasingly apparent.” ~ Aboriginal Justice Inquiry Commission (1999), Manitoba:<br /> <br /> Recommendations of the Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission:<br /> That…<br /> …the federal and provincial governments recognize the right of Aboriginal<br /> people to establish their own justice systems as part of their inherent right<br /> to self-government.<br /> …the federal and provincial governments assist Aboriginal people in the<br /> establishment of Aboriginal justice systems in their communities in a manner<br /> that best conforms to the traditions, cultures and wishes of those<br /> communities, and the rights of their people.<br /> ~ Aboriginal Justice Implementation Commission (1999): <br /> Source: Canadian Quotations:<br /> <br /> (page 2 of 2)

[Diogenes]

http://ezinearticles.com/?When-You-Attr ... ul&id=3184<br /> <br /> When You Attract Negative People, Be Thankful<br /> <br /> (and I am)<br /> <br /> Laws of Attraction are clearly defined. What comes back is a reflection of the energy you are radiating. If negative people are being attracted to you, then be self-assured that you are sending out energy that appeared on their radar screen.<br /> <br /> Instead of focusing on not trying to attract them. Be thankful you are.<br /> <br /> Okay, you say, that might be pushing it a little. Not really. You see, whatever you are attracting is giving you a clear projection of the energy that you are giving off. Or it could be something that you need to heal first in order to clear your energy. Most times, we could not see how we are radiating without this attraction<br /> <br /> <br /> ...when I heard this lady talking to me from the other stall. Actually feeling awkward and caught unaware, it took a few minutes before I could really make out what she was saying. By then, I was walking towards the sink to wash my hands. It wasn't until then did I get the gist of her story, language and negativity. It was a victim story about how the world is out to get her. Let me spare you the details."<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Heads up<br /> <br /> <br /> http://wwwthepeoplepro.blogspot.com/2005/10/how-to-deal-with-energy-suckers.html<br /> Thursday, October 27, 2005<br /> How to Deal With Energy Suckers (Negative People) <br /> <br /> We all know some; maybe at work or even at home. The Energy Suckers. They will suck you dry if you fall into their trap.<br /> <br /> Energy Suckers are negative people. It’s easy to know when you are with them because the longer the exposure, the more drained you feel. You try to avoid them, but Energy Suckers thrive on spreading bad tidings so they seek you out. They show up in your office, at meetings, and family gatherings. <br /> <br /> If they call you on the phone, your stomach starts to hurt as soon as you realize who is calling. While you pretend to listen, you are really thinking of a way to get off the phone. In fact you try to return their calls when you know they won’t be at home or at the office. You just want credit for the call; you don’t really want to talk with them.<br /> <br /> While you don’t want to join them in the mud, they seem to know when you are vulnerable and try to pull you in. You may even find, to your dismay that you agree with some of what they are saying.<br /> <br /> So how do you protect yourself? Here are some of the common types of Energy Suckers and how to deal with them:<br /> <br /> The Seagull—These are often managers or supervisors. They fly by when everyone is busy with a project, deposit garbage all over and soar away after destroying enthusiasm. They tend to pick at details like they are combing the beach, making negative comments as they work. They leave staff and co-workers feeling defeated and unappreciated.<br /> Solution: Obtain careful clarification before starting a project. If there has been confusion in the past with this Sucker, you may want to get things in writing.<br /> The Yeh-Butts—While they pretend to be friendly, their real focus is on the negative. They often use the phrase, “Yeh, but…” They then describe why the procedure, idea, or approach couldn’t possibly work. Experienced “Yeh-Butts” extend their method to other areas of life as well. If you mention the great weather, they say, “Yeh, but it’s supposed to rain by the weekend.” If you tell them they look nice, they say, “Yeh, but this dress really isn’t in style anymore.” They are not happy and they want you to know it.<br /> Solution: Ignore Yeh-Butts and their awful phrase. You may want to charge a quarter when ever someone in the office or at home uses the “Yeh, But” phrase.<br /> The Muck Mixers—These are the folks who love to stir the pot. They look for gossip or “information” that they feel they must know and then take it upon themselves to disseminate the dirt. They adore turmoil and conflict and will feed both if given the chance. Muck Mixers often “keep score” and tend to remember obscure information that can hurt others or their reputations. They are sometimes hard to ignore because their information is SOOO interesting.<br /> Solution: Avoid them like the plague or you will also become fodder for discussion. Their lack of productivity will eventually catch up with them. Make sure you are not standing next to them when they go down.<br /> Melvin Milktoast or Dorothy Doormat—These are the male and female equivalents of the Martyr. They are absolutely convinced that no one has seen the trouble they have. No one works as hard as they do. And they are the only ones who do not get a break. They seem to find trouble and then want everyone to know how they fix things at great personal expense. They may try to make those around them feel guilty with their superhuman efforts.<br /> Solution: Let them work. You have worked too hard to have a balanced life to fall for this game.<br /> <br /> Stay away from the Energy Suckers in your life. Spend your time with people who lift you up…not pull you down. You will find your own energy to be contagious.<br />

[Milton]

Good posts Dio, have you seen this? <br /> <a href="http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-7040453665540929835&q=bursting+bubbles+of+government+deception&total=24&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0">Bursting bubbles of government deception</a>

[Diogenes]

Many, many, many thanks Milton!<br /> I'm hip to some of what is in the video <br /> Thomas Pynchon was never more right when he said <br /> "If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers.<br /> We have been conditioned to ask the wrong questions and if anyone suggests this to most people , especialy those currently fighting a court battle you can be certain you will bw called all manner of names and be insulted <br /> <br /> How do I know this? <img align=absmiddle src='images/smilies/wink.gif' alt='Wink'> <br /> best to leave those folks to their own devices <br /> <br /> EXCELLENT offering Milton

[Diogenes]

Thanks again to Milton.<br /> If not for his contribution I would have been slowed and without direction.<br /> <br /> <br /> Here is a result of Miltons post on this page <br /> <br /> http://www.fortruth.org/legal.html<br /> <br /> Lawful = Good. Whereas Legal = a minefield the stealing of our rights, and freedoms<br /> <br /> Definition of "A Free Society, is having the choice to leave it" Robert-Arthur: Menard<br /> <br /> <br /> Quote's & Maxims in Law:<br /> "Let he who will be deceived.. be deceived"<br /> <br /> Said another way,<br /> <br /> Qui Vult Decipi Decipiatur<br /> Latin for "whoever wishes to be deceived, let them be deceived" <br /> <br /> <br /> "Legal versus Lawful! What does that mean? You may ask, are they not one, and the same? If something is lawful, does it not follow that it is also legal? The answer is most definitely NO!<br /> We have been misled in many things, and in particular with regards to things that relate to law.<b> However, the blame should not be directed upon those who have perpetrated the fraud. On the contrary. The blame should be directed against us, against ourselves, for allowing it to happen, and to continue to happen. Just as we should not blame government, politicians, and corporations for the things that they do. They can only do what we allow them to do, and remember silence, and inaction equals tacit consent."</b><br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Summary:<br /> <br /> Three things that influence our lives to a greater extent than all others is, Politics, Law, and Banking (the money system). Yet they are three of the most neglected subjects / topics in our education system. How many students graduating today can recite what their basic rights are? How many can give at least two extracts from the Magna Carta how many could explain the meaning of Habeas Corpus how many people reading this page could explain it?<br /> <br /> It is not my intent to write a book here, only to provide some alternative avenues of thought. Individual research, and verification, is the order of the day. The status quo is based both on our choices, and our ignorance. And as they say "ignorance is no excuse in the eyes of the law" Taking the time to become informed, and by not being silent is the only way to change the status quo.<br /> <br /> An excellent site to start your research is http://www.natural-person.ca/<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> *lacking knowledge

[Diogenes]

http://www.hackcanada.com/canadian/free ... _croft.pdf<br /> a short book<br /> <br /> <br /> "We serve no one by withholding information. We do not serve ourselves by refusing to investigate.<br /> Lack of information never assisted anyone. Accurate information allows us options; we can choose to take<br /> action based upon it or choose to ignore it, but not knowing does not assist us. So put aside your<br /> preconceived notions, your psychological defence mechanisms, and your prejudices. Take a chance on<br /> remembering what could well grant you complete economic, emotional, and spiritual freedom.<br /> Any “Logics” course will teach that we can have a completely logical system which reaches a logical<br /> conclusion yet it is not true because it is based upon a false premise. The mind seems not to care if it<br /> reacts from something that is untrue as long as it feels certainty. So, the best position from which to learn<br /> is from ‘uncertainty’ – ‘being in the question’.<br /> Can we afford to be so arrogant as to pretend we know something we don’t know the knowing of which<br /> could transform our lives – Werner Erhard<br /> Many people have ruined their lives when they could have prevented it ....<br /> but for want of opening their minds."

[Diogenes]

"For you Canadians who are feeling smug that this is not happening in Canada consider that Canada is the<br /> 13th Federal Reserve District. Both USA/ CA – the corporations – are subject to the jurisdiction of the<br /> Crown/ Vatican. Can/Am is not ‘a free country’. We are not free until we realize ‘who we are’. What I<br /> write applies either to America (the provinces and the united States) or to USA/ CA (corporations). There are<br /> certainly differences in our cultures but don’t kid yourself about jurisdiction."<br /> <br /> <br /> Didja know this?<br /> or this?<br /> <br /> "I always attributed to my cynicism these intuitive glimpses into the future until I learned that in 1993, in<br /> Canada, Bill C-124 was passed which states, approximately: In order to pay the national debt (as if there<br /> were any ‘national debt’) the government might be required, and now has the legislation in place, to<br /> confiscate the pensions, RRSPs, investments, property, and all other tangible assets of the people.<br /> <br /> <br /> and from a dif sourse<br /> <br /> "FACT: In 1965 the federal government signed an agreement with the United Nations, stating that at the first opportunity all law abiding Canadians would be disarmed.<br /> <br /> FACT: The Canadian government then passed a law in secret (order in counsel) called Bill C-124 giving them the right to confiscate anything of value without permission."<br /> <br />

[Diogenes]

Shifting gears...<br /> http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0STR/is_6_108/ai_54169026<br /> Learning to distinguish fact from opinion helps boost reading comprehension. Here are three ways to teach your class how to make this important distinction:<br /> <br /> 1. Explain that a statement is a fact if you can answer "yes" to these two questions: "Is it true?" and "Can it be proved?" A statement of opinion can be very well thought out but cannot be proved true or false - it is always open to debate. To spot opinions, look for signal words that often accompany opinions, such as think, believe, suggest, probably, perhaps, and usually, or judgment words. such as bad, good, best, worst, most, beautiful, and dangerous.<br /> <br />